Associations Between Sedentary Behavior and Blood Pressure in Young Children | Lifestyle Behaviors | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
August 3, 2009

Associations Between Sedentary Behavior and Blood Pressure in Young Children

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, Ames (Messrs Martinez-Gomez and Tucker and Dr Welk); Immunonutrition Research Group, Department of Metabolism and Nutrition, Institute of Food Science, Technology, and Nutrition, Spanish National Research Council, Madrid, Spain (Mr Martinez-Gomez); Human Performance Lab, University of Nebraska at Kearney (Dr Heelan); and Departments of Kinesiology and Pediatrics and Human Development, Michigan State University, East Lansing (Dr Eisenmann).

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(8):724-730. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.90

Objective  To examine the effect of sedentary behavior on blood pressure (BP) in young children using different indicators of sedentariness.

Design  Cross-sectional study.

Setting  A rural Midwestern US community.

Participants  Children aged 3 to 8 years (N = 111).

Intervention  Adiposity was assessed using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Objective measurements of sedentary activity were obtained from the accelerometers that participants wore continuously for 7 days. Measurements of television (TV) viewing, computer, and screen time (TV + computer) were obtained via parent report.

Main Outcome Measures  Systolic and diastolic BP.

Results  The sample spent a mean of 5 hours per day in sedentary activities, of which 1.5 hours were screen time. Accelerometer-determined sedentary activity was not significantly related to systolic BP or diastolic BP after controlling for age, sex, height, and percentage of body fat. However, TV viewing and screen time, but not computer use, were positively associated with both systolic BP and diastolic BP after adjusting for potential confounders. Participants in the lowest tertile of TV and screen time had significantly lower levels of systolic and diastolic BP than participants in the upper tertile.

Conclusions  Sedentary behaviors, particularly TV viewing and screen time, were associated with BP in children, independent of body composition. Other factors that occur during excessive screen time (eg, food consumption) should also be considered in the context of sedentary behavior and BP development in children.

The recent secular trend in obesity is a major public health concern.1 The clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors in overweight youth suggests that risks may be immediate and not just indicative of potential future problems.2 The effect of obesity on elevated blood pressure (BP)3,4 is a specific concern because there is evidence in favor of tracking BP from childhood into adulthood.5 Although genetic factors are associated with BP,6-9 a healthy lifestyle—specifically, diet,10,11 physical activity,12-14 and sleep15—seems to be a relevant contributor to BP levels in children. However, associations between sedentary behavior and BP have not been clearly established in youth,15-18 and no studies have examined associations in younger children (<9 years). Although often assumed to be correlated, physical activity and sedentary behavior are increasingly being viewed as independent constructs.19 Hamilton and colleagues20 have posited the notion of “physiologic inactivity,” whereby they differentiated between too much sitting (physiologic inactivity) and structured exercise (physiologic exercise). Daily physical inactivity or low nonexercise activity may be independently associated with tangible disease risks.

There is clear evidence of the association between adiposity and BP in children.21 Given the effects of adiposity on BP during childhood, attention should be paid to the adiposity rebound period between ages 3 and 7 years.22,23 In previous studies, we have found that adiposity is associated with BP in 3- to 8-year-old children24 and that sedentary behaviors were positively associated with adiposity.25 For these reasons, studies hypothesizing associations between sedentary behaviors and BP in this specific period must control for adiposity to examine the independent influence of sedentary behaviors on BP.

In most studies, sedentary behavior is typically identified as time spent watching television (TV) because it is the most popular form of media use. Nevertheless, recommendations for sedentary activity use the terms of overall media use or screen time.26 However, results from recent studies indicate that computer use and video game play may have different metabolic and physiologic effects.27 Hence, time spent in TV viewing, computer use, and screen time should be considered independently in health-related research. Sedentary behavior is most typically assessed with proxy reports by parents,28 but objective data can also be obtained using accelerometers.29 The time spent in specific sedentary behaviors cannot be determined, but it is possible to measure low-energy expenditure levels.30

To our knowledge, no studies have examined the associations between sedentary behavior and BP in young children using different indicators of sedentariness (ie, TV watching, computer use, screen time, and objectively assessed time in sedentary activity). Currently, it is unknown whether sedentary behavior is associated with higher levels of BP in children during the adiposity rebound period. For effective prevention of hypertension and cardiovascular disease, it is important to better understand the influence of sedentary behaviors on BP. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the associations between sedentary behavior and BP in young children.



Participants for the current analysis included 57 boys and 54 girls (N = 111) aged 3 through 8 years from a rural US community in the Midwest (population, 30 000) who completed correctly assessments of anthropometry, body composition, BP, and sedentary behavior by accelerometer and parent report. Children were recruited from local preschools and elementary schools through verbal and written advertisements and by word of mouth. Parental consent and child assent were obtained for all participants after the study procedures were explained. The protocol for the present study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Nebraska at Kearney.


Anthropometric measurements were assessed for each child using standard procedures. Participants wore light clothing and removed their shoes before stature and body weight were assessed. Stature was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall stadiometer, and body weight was measured to the nearest 0.01 kg using a standard balance beam scale. Body mass index was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

Body composition

Fat mass was assessed using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry with a densitometer (DPX-L; Lunar Radiation Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin). Whole-body scans were performed on participants while they were wearing light clothing and lying supine. The Lunar DPX-L densitometer has been well validated31 and has been used as the criterion measure for a number of comparisons with field-based methods (eg, body mass index, bioelectrical impedance, and anthropometry) in young children.32 To ensure reliability, a phantom calibration was performed before use. Adiposity measurements were determined using the pediatric medium scan model in the software for the densitometer (DPX-L, software version 1.5d; Lunar Radiation Corporation). Body fat variables derived from dual energy x-ray absoptiometry included percentage of body fat as well as fat mass and trunk fat mass (in kilograms). The upper trunk was separated from the arms by a line from the axilla to the acromion. The lower trunk was separated from the legs by an oblique line through the femoral neck.

Resting bp

Resting BP was measured in accordance with standard procedures and recommendations, as described elsewhere.33 A clinical mercury sphygmomanometer was used in conjunction with a stethoscope placed over the brachial artery below the bottom edge of the cuff. Appropriate cuff size was determined by measuring the circumference of the right upper arm at its largest point. Systolic BP (as determined by the first Korotkoff sound) and diastolic BP (as determined by the fifth Korotkoff sound) were measured after participants had been seated for 10 minutes and with their right arms supported and both feet on the floor. Three measurements were taken at 1-minute intervals, and the mean was used for data analysis.

Sedentary behavior

Objective Assessment

Objective sedentary activity was assessed using an accelerometer (ActiGraph, model 7164; Manufacturing Technology, Inc, Fort Walton, Florida). The ActiGraph is a small (5.1 × 3.8 × 1.5 cm), lightweight (45 g), and uniaxial accelerometer designed to detect vertical acceleration ranging in magnitude from 0.05g to 2.00g with a frequency response of 0.25 to 2.50 Hz. This monitor has been validated in both field and free-living research34 and has been used to assess activity patterns in numerous studies.35,36 Instructions were given to both the parent and child regarding proper placement and wearing procedures for the activity monitor. Specifically, the accelerometers were worn over the right hip, anterior to the iliac crest, and participants were asked to wear the monitor at all times with the exception of sleeping and water activities, such as bathing and swimming. Participants wore the monitor for 7 consecutive days, after which the monitors were returned and uploaded using software provided by the manufacturer. For the current study, 30-second epochs were used in concordance with the recommendations for this age group.37

Data were exported into a spreadsheet (Excel; Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington) and then imported into SAS statistical software, version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, North Carolina) for processing. Detailed screening procedures were used to ensure that the accelerometers were worn as directed and that the monitors were functioning properly. Specifically, adherence checks were performed by assessing consecutive missing data during the hours of typical wear time (9 AM to 7 PM). A day of monitoring was considered nonadherent if it contained 3 or more 20-minute periods of missing data (0 counts). Children with complete data for at least 2 weekdays and 1 weekend day were included in the current study. A cutoff point of less than 50 counts per 30 seconds was used in this study to estimate time (in minutes) spent in sedentary activity.38 This threshold has been shown to capture sedentary activities such as watching TV, playing video games, painting, sitting, and other activities with low levels of physical activity.30,38

Parental Report

The average time spent each day (weekdays and weekend days combined) in screen time (TV, video, computer, and video game usage) was assessed from parent-reported values. Time spent watching TV was defined as minutes spent watching TV, videotapes, or DVDs. Computer use was defined as minutes spent using a home computer or video game. Screen time was computed by summing minutes spent in TV viewing and computer use.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive characteristics are presented as mean (SD). All variables were checked for normality of distribution. Fat mass measurements and parent-reported sedentary behavior were natural logarithmically transformed. Differences between boys and girls were examined by 1-way analysis of variance. In preliminary analyses, no significant interactions were found between sex and body fat measurements or sedentary activities; therefore, all analyses were conducted with girls and boys together. Linear associations between body fat measurements and BP were assessed by partial correlation, controlling for age, sex, and height. The associations between sedentary variables (objectively measured sedentary activity and parent-reported times spent in TV viewing, in computer use, and in screen time) and systolic and diastolic BP were measured by linear regression, adjusting for age, sex, height, and body fat measurements.

Analysis of covariance, controlling for age, sex, height, and percentage of body fat, was used to examine differences in systolic and diastolic BP values stratified by tertiles of sedentary behavior (low, middle, and high). Bonferroni adjustments for multiple comparisons were used to examine the differences between the tertiles. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS statistical software, version 14.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois), with the level of significance set at P < .05.


The descriptive characteristics of the total sample and differences between girls and boys are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences in age, height, weight, body mass index, and systolic or diastolic BP between girls and boys. Body fat measurements were significantly higher among girls than boys. Parental reported screen time approximated 1.5 hours per day and objectively measured sedentary time 5 hours per day. Boys spent significantly more time using computers than did girls (P = .004). Other sedentary activity measurements did not show significant differences between girls and boys. The range of values for sedentary behaviors should be noted.

Table 1. 
Characteristics of Study Participantsa
Characteristics of Study Participantsa

Partial correlations, controlling for sex, age, and height, showed positive associations between body fat measurements and BP. Systolic BP was significantly associated with percentage of body fat (r = 0.344; P <.001), total fat mass (r = 0.245; P = .01), and trunk fat (r = 0.285; P = .003). Diastolic BP was also significantly associated with percentage of body fat (r = 0.237; P = .01) and trunk fat (r = 0.217; P = .02).

The results of the regression analysis are presented in Table 2. Accelerometer-determined sedentary activity was not significantly associated with BP. Time spent in TV viewing was positively associated with both systolic BP (P = .001) and diastolic BP (P = .02), whereas time spent using the computer was not significantly associated with BP values (P = .18 and P = .23, respectively). Screen time was positively associated with systolic BP (P = .002) but not with diastolic BP (P = .15). Age, sex, height, and percentage of body fat explained 29% of the variation in systolic BP (adjusted R2 = 0.29) and 24% in diastolic BP (adjusted R2 = 0.24). Additional analyses using total fat mass and trunk fat measurements as confounders instead of percentage of body fat showed similar results (data not shown).

Table 2. 
Association Between Blood Pressure and Sedentary Behaviora
Association Between Blood Pressure and Sedentary Behaviora

Systolic BP (F, 0.07; P = .94) and diastolic BP (F, 1.78; P = .17) were not significantly different when stratified by tertiles of objectively measured sedentary activity (Figure 1). There were significant trends in time spent in TV viewing, stratified by tertiles for both systolic BP (F, 8.82; P <.001) and diastolic BP (F, 3.39; P = .04). Significant contrasts in systolic and diastolic BP were found between the lowest tertile and the highest tertile of time spent watching TV (Figure 2). Values for BP across tertiles of time spent using computers were borderline significant for systolic BP (F, 3.09; P = .05) and not significant for diastolic BP (F, 1.20; P = .30) (Figure 2). Systolic BP (F, 6.10; P = .003) but not diastolic BP (F, 0.32; P = .72) was also significantly different across tertiles of screen time. Analysis of covariance adjusted for confounders also showed a trend between systolic BP values by tertiles of screen time (F, 6.10; P = .003) but not with diastolic values (F, 0.32; P = .72). Upon individual comparison, a significant contrast was found when comparing the lowest tertile to the highest tertile in diastolic BP (Figure 2). Tertile means, 95% confidence intervals, and ranges of sedentary activities measured objectively and via parent report are displayed in Table 3.

Figure 1. 
Mean systolic (A) and diastolic (B) blood pressure stratified in tertiles (low, middle, and high) by time spent in sedentary activity, assessed with an accelerometer. Errors bars represent standard error of the mean. Data were analyzed by analysis of covariance with Bonferroni adjustment for sex, age, height, and percentage of body fat.

Mean systolic (A) and diastolic (B) blood pressure stratified in tertiles (low, middle, and high) by time spent in sedentary activity, assessed with an accelerometer. Errors bars represent standard error of the mean. Data were analyzed by analysis of covariance with Bonferroni adjustment for sex, age, height, and percentage of body fat.

Figure 2. 
Mean systolic (A) and diastolic blood pressure (B) stratified in tertiles (low, middle, and high) by time spent watching television, using a computer, and screen time, assessed by parent report. Errors bars represent standard error of the mean. Data were analyzed by analysis of covariance with Bonferroni adjustment for sex, age, height, and percentage of body fat. *Significantly different from the low tertile (P = .01). †Significantly different from the low tertile (P = .001). ‡Significantly different from the low tertile (P = .002). §Significantly different from the low tertile (P = .047).

Mean systolic (A) and diastolic blood pressure (B) stratified in tertiles (low, middle, and high) by time spent watching television, using a computer, and screen time, assessed by parent report. Errors bars represent standard error of the mean. Data were analyzed by analysis of covariance with Bonferroni adjustment for sex, age, height, and percentage of body fat. *Significantly different from the low tertile (P = .01). †Significantly different from the low tertile (P = .001). ‡Significantly different from the low tertile (P = .002). §Significantly different from the low tertile (P = .047).

Table 3. 
Sedentary Activity, TV Viewing, Computer Use, and Screen Time by Tertile
Sedentary Activity, TV Viewing, Computer Use, and Screen Time by Tertile


The results of this study show that sedentary behavior was positively associated with BP in young children. More specifically, TV viewing and screen time (computed by summing the time spent in TV viewing and computer use) were associated with BP after controlling for age, sex, height, and adiposity.

Although previous studies show that sedentary behaviors are related to adiposity25,39-43 and adiposity is related to BP,21,24 this is the first study, to our knowledge, to examine associations between sedentary behaviors and BP in children during the adiposity rebound period. Several similar studies have been conducted in older children with the same purpose. Guillaume et al16 found positive associations between TV time and systolic BP in 6- to 12-year-old Belgium boys but not girls. Likewise, Ekelund et al17 examined the associations between TV viewing and metabolic risk in the samples of 9- and 15-year-old children from the European Youth Heart Study. The authors did not find significant associations between time spent watching TV and systolic or diastolic BP. In contrast, Wells et al15 found that 1 hour per day of TV viewing was associated with an increase of 0.35 mm Hg in systolic BP and 0.25 mm Hg in diastolic BP among 10- to 12-year-old Brazilian children. However, a limitation of these studies is that they did not control for adiposity. Pardee et al18 found that time spent watching TV was associated with risk of hypertension in severely obese children, controlling for individual weight status. However, a longitudinal study also found no association between TV viewing in childhood and BP in adulthood, independent of adiposity.44

The prevalence rates for elevated BP among US children have been increasing in recent years.3,4 Effective prevention strategies are clearly needed given the tracking of BP and the early development of hypertension, obesity, and other cardiovascular disease risk factors in youth.5 Several studies indicate that the heritability of BP is estimated to be about 30%.6 Although genetics clearly affect BP, lifestyle also plays an important role in explaining the remaining variance in resting BP. Diet10,11 and physical activity12-14 both have been shown to be associated with hypertension, but special attention is given here to the physical activity results. In a study of 5500 children from the United Kingdom aged 11 to 12 years, higher levels of accelerometry-determined total physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were associated with lower BP levels.12 Andersen et al13 also found associations between accelerometry-determined physical activity and systolic and diastolic BP in children from the European Youth Heart Study. Similarly, a moderate dose-response relationship was found between physical activity and BP in a representative sample of US children participating in the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys.14 Recent findings also indicate that sleep duration is inversely associated with BP in children,15 but additional research is needed to confirm these findings.

Our results indicate that sedentary activity assessed by accelerometer was not associated with BP. However, screen time and, more particularly, TV viewing was significantly associated with BP, independent of adiposity. There are several possible explanations for the association between TV viewing and BP. First, isolated physical inactivity watching TV may have direct effects on BP. Second, isolated unhealthy behaviors that children may participate in during TV viewing (eg, eating) may indirectly produce the effects on BP. Time spent watching TV has been associated with behaviors such as increased consumption of high-fat, high-sugar, and salty foods and decreased consumption of fruits and vegetables.45-48 Furthermore, these behaviors are commonly associated with adiposity in children and consequently with BP. Third, both inactivity and related unhealthy behaviors during TV time may produce synergistic effects on BP. Last, TV viewing may disrupt sleep hours in children.49 However, these explanations cannot be directly elucidated from our results.

Besides the possible interactions of diet, sleep duration, and TV viewing with BP, our findings also suggest that displacing screen time with even low-intensity physical activity may be an important preventive factor during childhood. Moreover, we observed that participants in the lowest tertile of TV viewing had significantly lower systolic and diastolic BP than participants in the upper tertiles. Participants in the lowest tertile of screen time were also significantly different in systolic BP than participants in the upper tertile of screen time. Participants in the low-tertile groups spent an average of less than 30 min/d in TV viewing and screen time. Hence, these results suggest that 30 minute per day of media use may be a reasonable threshold in young children to prevent higher levels of BP.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that parents should limit children's screen time to no more than 2 hours per day.26 Our results and those of others show that young children spend much of their waking hours in sedentary activities. The youth in our sample spent an average of 5 hours per day in sedentary activities, of which 1.5 hours were screen time. Results from the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys indicated that 31.4%, 6.1%, and 37.3% of 2- to 5-year-old children spent more than 2 hours per day in TV viewing, computer use, and screen time, respectively.39 It is worth remembering that the recommendation proposed by the American Academy of Pediatrics only includes sedentary activities related to media use. In contrast, Corbin and Pangrazi50 recommend limiting extended periods of 2 hours or more of sedentary activities (whether media use or not) for children, especially during the daytime. This recommendation is in line with the idea of the physical inactivity paradigm.20 However, our findings are limited to screen time, and BP may be related to diet and sleeping patterns influenced by screen time, as discussed in the Introduction and the preceding paragraphs. Nonetheless, reducing sedentary behavior is an important and promising strategy to prevent obesity and hypertension in the young. Behavioral choice theories suggest that reducing sedentary behaviors is a way to increase physical activity.51 A current randomized controlled clinical trial examined the effects of reducing television viewing and computer use on children's adiposity during the adiposity rebound period.52 The results suggested that reducing television viewing and computer use may have an important role in preventing obesity among 4- to 7-year-old children.

The strengths of this study include the use of direct measures, such as dual energy x-ray absoptiometry, to evaluate adiposity and to examine sedentary behavior using several indicators. Field methods to evaluate adiposity have significantly underestimated adiposity in younger children.32 Ideally, these evaluations should be made using direct measures such as dual energy x-ray absoptiometry or underwater weighing. On the other hand, TV viewing is the most common indicator of sedentary behavior, although the recommendation from the American Academy of Pediatrics considers overall media use. Thus, TV viewing and computer use are generally summed to obtain screen time. However, metabolic and physiologic responses, including systolic and diastolic BP values, to video game play among children were different than time spent watching TV,27 which suggests that TV viewing and computer use should not be combined exclusively as screen time. Likewise, the new-generation computer games may promote slight increases in physical activity compared with traditional sedentary computer games.53 Another strength of this study was the inclusion of objectively measured time in sedentary behavior by accelerometer. Sedentary behaviors may be defined as “activities that do not increase energy expenditure substantially above the resting level.”29(p174) Considering this definition, sedentary behavior involves energy expenditure at the level of less than 1.5 metabolic equivalent tasks and includes activities such as sitting or lying down, regardless of whether screen time (TV, video games, etc) is occurring. Further research is warranted to understand the effect of sedentary behavior on health (eg, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome) using this definition.

Our study has 2 limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. First, time spent in TV viewing and computer use was assessed by parent report. Although parent report is widely used to assess several lifestyle indicators in younger children, differences with objective methods may be large. Recent studies highlight that parents underestimate their child's TV time by more than 3 hours per week compared with an objective method when the child has a TV in the bedroom and overestimate television time by 4 hours per week when there is not a TV in the child's bedroom.54 Unfortunately, we did not determine whether children had TVs in their bedrooms. Second, there is no consensus on the threshold for sedentary activity using the ActiGraph accelerometer.34 Previous studies have used different cutoff points in children, and differences among published children's cutoff points have been described elsewhere.55

In conclusion, the results of this study showed that TV viewing and screen time were associated with BP independent of body composition in children. Given that total objective sedentary time was not associated with BP, it appears that other factors, which occur during excessive screen time, should also be considered in the context of sedentary behavior and BP development in children.

Correspondence: Joey C. Eisenmann, PhD, Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, 3 IM Sports Cir, East Lansing, MI 48824 (

Accepted for Publication: February 3, 2009.

Author Contributions: Mr Martinez-Gomez and Drs Welk and Eisenmann had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Heelan and Eisenmann. Acquisition of data: Tucker, Heelan, and Eisenmann. Analysis and interpretation of data: Martinez-Gomez, Tucker, Welk, and Eisenmann. Drafting of the manuscript: Martinez-Gomez, Welk, and Eisenmann. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Martinez-Gomez, Tucker, Heelan, Welk, and Eisenmann. Statistical analysis: Martinez-Gomez and Welk. Obtained funding: Heelan and Eisenmann. Administrative, technical, and material support: Heelan. Study supervision: Welk and Eisenmann.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding Support: This work was supported in part by a York University Faculty of Arts Research Grant, American Heart Association Beginning-Grant-in-Aid No. 0665500Z (Dr Eisenmann), a University of Nebraska at Kearney Grant (Dr Heelan), and scholarship AP2006-02464 from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (Mr Martinez-Gomez).

Additional Information: This research was conducted by Mr Martinez-Gomez while working at Iowa State University as a visiting scholar.

Additional Contributions: Heather McArel, BSc, Chad Cook, BSc, Ryan Krueger, BSc, Ashley Scantling, BSc, and Bryce Abbey, MSc, assisted with data collection.

Wang  YLobstein  T Worldwide trends in childhood overweight and obesity.  Int J Pediatr Obes 2006;1 (1) 11- 25PubMedGoogle Scholar
Duncan  GELi  SMZhou  XH Prevalence and trends of a metabolic syndrome phenotype among U.S. adolescents, 1999-2000.  Diabetes Care 2004;27 (10) 2438- 2443PubMedGoogle Scholar
Din-Dzietham  RLiu  YBielo  MVShamsa  F High blood pressure trends in children and adolescents in national surveys, 1963 to 2002.  Circulation 2007;116 (13) 1488- 1496PubMedGoogle Scholar
Muntner  PHe  JCutler  JAWildman  RPWhelton  PK Trends in blood pressure among children and adolescents.  JAMA 2004;291 (17) 2107- 2113PubMedGoogle Scholar
Chen  XWang  Y Tracking of blood pressure from childhood to adulthood: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.  Circulation 2008;117 (25) 3171- 3180PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bouchard  CMalina  RMPerusse  L Genetics of Fitness and Physical Performance.  Champaign, IL Human Kinetics Inc1997;
Rice  TRankinen  TProvince  MA  et al.  Genome-wide linkage analysis of systolic and diastolic blood pressure: the Québec Family Study.  Circulation 2000;102 (16) 1956- 1963PubMedGoogle Scholar
Allison  DBHeshka  SHeymsfield  SB Evidence of a major gene with pleiotropic action for cardiovascular disease risk syndrome in children younger than 14 years.  Am J Dis Child 1993;147 (12) 1298- 1302PubMedGoogle Scholar
Cui  JHopper  JLHarrap  SB Genes and family environment explain correlations between blood pressure and body mass index.  Hypertension 2002;40 (1) 7- 12PubMedGoogle Scholar
He  FJMacGregor  GA Importance of salt in determining blood pressure in children: meta-analysis of controlled trials.  Hypertension 2006;48 (5) 861- 869PubMedGoogle Scholar
He  FJMarrero  NMMacgregor  GA Salt and blood pressure in children and adolescents.  J Hum Hypertens 2008;22 (1) 4- 11PubMedGoogle Scholar
Leary  SDNess  ARSmith  GD  et al.  Physical activity and blood pressure in childhood: findings from a population-based study.  Hypertension 2008;51 (1) 92- 98PubMedGoogle Scholar
Andersen  LBHarro  MSardinha  LB  et al.  Physical activity and clustered cardiovascular risk in children: a cross-sectional study (the European Youth Heart Study).  Lancet 2006;368 (9532) 299- 304PubMedGoogle Scholar
Mark  AEJanssen  I Dose-response relation between physical activity and blood pressure in youth.  Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40 (6) 1007- 1012PubMedGoogle Scholar
Wells  JCHallal  PCReichert  FFMenezes  AMAraújo  CLVictora  CG Sleep patterns and television viewing in relation to obesity and blood pressure: evidence from an adolescent Brazilian birth cohort.  Int J Obes (Lond) 2008;32 (7) 1042- 1049PubMedGoogle Scholar
Guillaume  MLapidus  LBjörntorp  PLambert  A Physical activity, obesity, and cardiovascular risk factors in children: the Belgian Luxembourg Child Study II.  Obes Res 1997;5 (6) 549- 556PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ekelund  UBrage  SFroberg  K  et al.  TV viewing and physical activity are independently associated with metabolic risk in children: the European Youth Heart Study.  PLoS Med 2006;3 (12) e488PubMedGoogle Scholar
Pardee  PENorman  GJLustig  RHPreud’homme  DSchwimmer  JB Television viewing and hypertension in obese children.  Am J Prev Med 2007;33 (6) 439- 443PubMedGoogle Scholar
Taveras  EMField  AEBerkey  CS  et al.  Longitudinal relationship between television viewing and leisure-time physical activity during adolescence.  Pediatrics 2007;119 (2) e314- e319PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hamilton  MTHamilton  DGZderic  TW Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.  Diabetes 2007;56 (11) 2655- 2667PubMedGoogle Scholar
Sorof  JDaniels  S Obesity hypertension in children: a problem of epidemic proportions.  Hypertension 2002;40 (4) 441- 447PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rolland-Cachera  MFDeheeger  MBellisle  FSempé  MGuilloud-Bataille  MPatois  E Adiposity rebound in children: a simple indicator for predicting obesity.  Am J Clin Nutr 1984;39 (1) 129- 135PubMedGoogle Scholar
Cole  TJ Children grow and horses race: is the adiposity rebound a critical period for later obesity?  BMC Pediatr 2004;46PubMedGoogle Scholar
Eisenmann  JCWrede  JHeelan  KA Associations between adiposity, family history of CHD, and blood pressure in 3- to 8-year-old children.  J Hum Hypertens 2005;19 (9) 675- 681PubMedGoogle Scholar
Heelan  KAEisenmann  JC Physical activity, media time, and body composition in young children.  J Phys Act Health 2006;3 (2) 200- 209Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Public Education, Children, adolescents, and television.  Pediatrics 2001;107 (2) 423- 426PubMedGoogle Scholar
Wang  XPerry  AC Metabolic and physiologic responses to video game play in 7- to 10-year-old boys.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160 (4) 411- 415PubMedGoogle Scholar
Anderson  DRField  DECollins  PALorch  PNathan  JF Estimates of young children's time with television: a methodological comparison of parent reports with time-lapse video home observation.  Child Dev 1985;56 (5) 1345- 1357PubMedGoogle Scholar
Pate  RRO’Neill  JRLobelo  F The evolving definition of “sedentary.”  Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2008;36 (4) 173- 178PubMedGoogle Scholar
Puyau  MRAdolph  ALVohra  FAButte  NF Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children.  Obes Res 2002;10 (3) 150- 157PubMedGoogle Scholar
Pintauro  SJNagy  TRDuthie  CGoran  MI Cross-calibration of fat and lean measurements by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry to pig carcass analysis in the pediatric body weight range.  Am J Clin Nutr 1996;63 (3) 293- 298PubMedGoogle Scholar
Eisenmann  JCHeelan  KAWelk  GJ Assessing body composition among 3- to 8-year-old children: anthropometry, BIA, and DXA.  Obes Res 2004;12 (10) 1633- 1640PubMedGoogle Scholar
National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents, The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents.  Pediatrics 2004;114 (2) ((suppl 4th report)) 555- 576PubMedGoogle Scholar
Freedson  PPober  DJanz  KF Calibration of accelerometer output for children.  Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005;37 (11) ((suppl)) S523- S530PubMedGoogle Scholar
Nader  PRBradley  RHHouts  RM McRitchie  SLO’Brien  M Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity from ages 9 to 15 years.  JAMA 2008;300 (3) 295- 305PubMedGoogle Scholar
Troiano  RPBerrigan  DDodd  KWMâsse  LCTilert  T McDowell  M Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer.  Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40 (1) 181- 188PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ward  DSEvenson  KRVaughn  ARodgers  ABTroiano  RP Accelerometer use in physical activity: best practices and research recommendations.  Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005;37 (11) ((suppl)) S582- S588PubMedGoogle Scholar
Treuth  MSSchmitz  KCatellier  DJ  et al.  Defining accelerometer thresholds for activity intensities in adolescent girls.  Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36 (7) 1259- 1266PubMedGoogle Scholar
Mendoza  JAZimmerman  FJChristakis  DA Television viewing, computer use, obesity, and adiposity in US preschool children.  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2007;444PubMed10.1186/1479-5868-4-44Google Scholar
Proctor  MHMoore  LLGao  D  et al.  Television viewing and change in body fat from preschool to early adolescence: the Framingham Children's Study.  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003;27 (7) 827- 833PubMedGoogle Scholar
Janz  KFLevy  SMBurns  TLTorner  JCWilling  MCWarren  JJ Fatness, physical activity, and television viewing in children during the adiposity rebound period: the Iowa Bone Development Study.  Prev Med 2002;35 (6) 563- 571PubMedGoogle Scholar
Jago  RBaranowski  TBaranowski  JCThompson  DGreaves  KA BMI from 3-6 y of age is predicted by TV viewing and physical activity, not diet.  Int J Obes (Lond) 2005;29 (6) 557- 564PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rey-López  JPVicente-Rodríguez  GBiosca  MMoreno  LA Sedentary behaviour and obesity development in children and adolescents.  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2008;18 (3) 242- 251PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hancox  RJMilne  BJPoulton  R Association between child and adolescent television viewing and adult health: a longitudinal birth cohort study.  Lancet 2004;364 (9430) 257- 262PubMedGoogle Scholar
He  FJMarrero  NMMacGregor  GA Salt intake is related to soft drink consumption in children and adolescents: a link to obesity?  Hypertension 2008;51 (3) 629- 634PubMedGoogle Scholar
Temple  JLGiacomelli  AMKent  KMRoemmich  JNEpstein  LH Television watching increases motivated responding for food and energy intake in children.  Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85 (2) 355- 361PubMedGoogle Scholar
Taveras  EMSandora  TJShih  MCRoss-Degnan  DGoldmann  DAGillman  MW The association of television and video viewing with fast food intake by preschool-age children.  Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006;14 (11) 2034- 2041PubMedGoogle Scholar
Matheson  DMKillen  JDWang  YVarady  ARobinson  TN Children's food consumption during television viewing.  Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79 (6) 1088- 1094PubMedGoogle Scholar
Paavonen  EJPennonen  MRoine  MValkonen  SLahikainen  AR TV exposure associated with sleep disturbances in 5- to 6-year-old children.  J Sleep Res 2006;15 (2) 154- 161PubMedGoogle Scholar
Corbin  CBPangrazi  RP Physical Activity for Children: A Statement of Guidelines for Children Ages 5-12. 2nd ed. Reston, VA:  National Association for Sport and Physical Education2004;
Epstein  LHRoemmich  JN Reducing sedentary behavior: role in modifying physical activity.  Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2001;29 (3) 103- 108PubMedGoogle Scholar
Epstein  LHRoemmich  JNRobinson  JL  et al.  A randomized trial of the effects of reducing television viewing and computer use on body mass index in young children.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008;162 (3) 239- 245PubMedGoogle Scholar
Graves  LERidgers  NDStratton  G The contribution of upper limb and total body movement to adolescents' energy expenditure whilst playing Nintendo Wii.  Eur J Appl Physiol 2008;104 (4) 617- 623PubMedGoogle Scholar
Robinson  JLWiniewicz  DDFuerch  JHRoemmich  JNEpstein  LH Relationship between parental estimate and an objective measure of child television watching.  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2006;343PubMed10.1186/1479-5868-3-43Google Scholar
Guinhouya  CBHubert  HSoubrier  SVilhelm  CLemdani  MDurocher  A Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity among children: discrepancies in accelerometry-based cut-off points.  Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006;14 (5) 774- 777PubMedGoogle Scholar