Internally standardized (reference year, 2012) by age group, sex, and region; patients with unknown region and physician specialty were excluded (remaining n = 687 170).
For adjusted analyses, we used stabilized-inverse probability of treatment weights. Variables entered into the propensity score model (collected in the year before antidepressant initiation) include sex, age, antidepressant type, specific depression diagnosis, inpatient depression diagnosis, physician type, treated self-harm event, psychotherapy use, psychiatric comorbidities with markers for anxiety disorders, and markers of health care use (outpatient visits and medication count). In the unweighted cohort, 24.1% of simultaneous new users and 22.5% of non–simultaneous new users had less than 6 months of insurance enrollment after antidepressant initiation.
eFigure 1. Proportion of Simultaneous New Users of an Antidepressant and a Benzodiazepine by Age at Antidepressant Treatment Initiation
eFigure 2. Proportion of Antidepressant and Benzodiazepine Simultaneous New Users Who Became Long-term Benzodiazepine Users
eTable 1. Characteristics of Simultaneous Antidepressant and Benzodiazepine New Users and Non-Simultaneous Antidepressant New Users With Depression and Factors Associated With Simultaneous New Use
eTable 2. Details of the Initial Benzodiazepine Prescription Among Antidepressant and Benzodiazepine Simultaneous New Users: Overall and by Selected Physicians
eTable 3. Long-term Benzodiazepine Use Among Simultaneous New Users by Baseline Patient Characteristics and Initial Prescription Details (Full List of Characteristics)
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Bushnell GA, Stürmer T, Gaynes BN, Pate V, Miller M. Simultaneous Antidepressant and Benzodiazepine New Use and Subsequent Long-term Benzodiazepine Use in Adults With Depression, United States, 2001-2014. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(7):747–755. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1273
When adults with depression begin antidepressant therapy, how often do they simultaneously begin benzodiazepine therapy, does antidepressant treatment length differ in patients with simultaneous new use of an antidepressant and benzodiazepine, and how often does beginning use of the medications together result in long-term benzodiazepine use?
In this cohort study of 765 130 adults who started taking an antidepressant, 81 020 also started taking a benzodiazepine the same day, with the proportion of patients with simultaneous new antidepressant and benzodiazepine use increasing from 6.1% in 2001 to 12.5% in 2012 (then plateauing through 2014). No clinically meaningful difference in antidepressant treatment continuation by simultaneous antidepressant and benzodiazepine new use was found, and 12.3% of patients who began treatment with both these agents had long-term (6-month) benzodiazepine use.
The decision to prescribe a benzodiazepine when a patient begins antidepressant therapy requires careful consideration of potential benefits and harms.
Benzodiazepines have been prescribed for short periods to patients with depression who are beginning antidepressant therapy to improve depressive symptoms more quickly, mitigate concomitant anxiety, and improve antidepressant treatment continuation. However, benzodiazepine therapy is associated with risks, including dependency, which may take only a few weeks to develop.
To examine trends in simultaneous benzodiazepine and antidepressant new use among adults with depression initiating an antidepressant, assess antidepressant treatment length by simultaneous new use status, estimate subsequent long-term benzodiazepine use in those with simultaneous antidepressant and benzodiazepine new use, and identify determinants of simultaneous new use and long-term benzodiazepine use.
Design, Setting, and Participants
This cohort study using a US commercial claims database included commercially insured adults (aged 18-64 years) from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2014, with a recent depression diagnosis who began antidepressant therapy but had not used antidepressants or benzodiazepines in the prior year.
Simultaneous new use, defined as a new benzodiazepine prescription dispensed on the same day as a new antidepressant prescription.
Main Outcomes and Measures
The proportion of antidepressant initiators with simultaneous new use and continuing antidepressant treatment for 6 months and the proportion of simultaneous new users receiving long-term (6-months) benzodiazepine therapy.
Of the 765 130 adults (median age, 39 years; interquartile range, 29-49 years; 507 451 women [66.3%]) who initiated antidepressant treatment, 81 020 (10.6%) also initiated benzodiazepine treatment. The mean annual increase in the proportion simultaneously starting use of both agents from 2001 to 2014 was 0.49% (95% CI, 0.47%-0.51%), increasing from 6.1% (95% CI, 5.5%-6.6%) in 2001 to 12.5% (95% CI, 12.3%-12.7%) in 2012 and stabilizing through 2014 (11.3%; 95% CI, 11.1%-11.5%). Similar findings were apparent by age group and physician type. Antidepressant treatment length was similar in simultaneous new users and non–simultaneous new users. Among simultaneous new users, 12.3% (95% CI, 12.0%-12.5%) exhibited long-term benzodiazepine use (64.0% discontinued taking benzodiazepines after the initial fill). Determinants of long-term benzodiazepine use after simultaneous new use were longer initial benzodiazepine days’ supply, first prescription for a long-acting benzodiazepine, and recent prescription opioid fills.
Conclusions and Relevance
One-tenth of antidepressant initiators with depression simultaneously initiated benzodiazepine therapy. No meaningful difference in antidepressant treatment at 6 months was observed by simultaneous new use status. Because of the risks associated with benzodiazepines, simultaneous new use at antidepressant initiation and the benzodiazepine regimen itself require careful consideration.
When patients with depression begin antidepressant therapy, sometimes a benzodiazepine is added to the therapy to mitigate the anxiety and insomnia that occur with depression,1,2 reduce depression severity more quickly,2,3 and improve antidepressant persistence.2 Because benzodiazepine dependency may develop quickly,4-6 practice guidelines recommend only short-term benzodiazepine use.7 For example, the United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Care Excellence depression guideline cautions against using a benzodiazepine for more than 2 weeks when prescribed to patients also taking antidepressants, noting further that it remains unclear whether starting benzodiazepine therapy at antidepressant therapy initiation produces desirable effects in efficacy or tolerability.8
Despite cautions and concerns, benzodiazepines are commonly prescribed during antidepressant treatment; 10% to 57% of antidepressant users receive benzodiazepines or other anxiolytics at some time during antidepressant treatment.9-18 Less is known about the specific practice of simultaneously beginning benzodiazepine therapy with antidepressant therapy. The largest US study19 used Veterans Health Administration data and found that 7.6% of adults with depression who initiated antidepressant treatment in 2007 also initiated benzodiazepine treatment on the same day; 14.1% continued benzodiazepine treatment for 1 year. Patients who simultaneously started use of these drugs were more likely to have anxiety and to visit a psychiatrist.19
Comparable statistics for privately insured adults in the United States, who comprise 64% of all US adults aged 18 to 64 years in 2012,20 have not been published, to our knowledge. To address current research gaps in US commercially insured adults, we describe (1) how frequently antidepressant initiators simultaneously start benzodiazepine therapy, (2) changes in simultaneous new use over time, and (3) the proportion of simultaneous new users who become long-term benzodiazepine users. In addition, we assessed whether antidepressant treatment length varies between simultaneous new users and non–simultaneous new users and identify determinants of simultaneous new use and long-term benzodiazepine use.
We used Truven’s MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. The database includes claims for inpatient and outpatient diagnoses, procedure codes, and records for reimbursed, dispensed prescriptions for privately insured individuals. The study population consisted of adults aged 18 to 64 years with a recent depression diagnosis who initiated antidepressant treatment from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2014. Included adults had no record of a benzodiazepine or antidepressant prescription in the year before antidepressant treatment initiation. All antidepressant types were included (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, bupropion, tricyclic antidepressants, and others). Benzodiazepines included alprazolam, chlordiazepoxide, clorazepate dipotassium, diazepam, oxazepam, lorazepam, clobazam, flurazepam, estazolam, triazolam, temazepam, midazolam, quazepam, and clonazepam. Similar to the meta-analysis2 on randomized clinical trials of benzodiazepine and antidepressant therapy compared with antidepressant therapy alone, we did not include drugs with similar properties, such as z drugs (eg, zolpidem). Depression was defined as a recorded inpatient or outpatient diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes 296.20-296.25, 296.30-296.35, 300.4x, 311.x, 309.28, 309.0-309.1) in the 30 days before or on the date of antidepressant treatment initiation to capture patients initiating use of the antidepressant for depression. The index depression diagnosis was defined as the diagnosis on the day of or before antidepressant treatment initiation. Patients were required to have continuous insurance enrollment in the year before antidepressant treatment initiation. Patients with a recorded diagnosis of substance abuse, personality disorder, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia in the year before antidepressant treatment initiation were excluded. This study was exempted from review by the University of North Carolina’s Institutional Review Board; therefore, no informed consent was required.
Simultaneous new use was defined as a record of a dispensed benzodiazepine prescription on the date of antidepressant treatment initiation. All patients were previously naive to treatment with antidepressants and benzodiazepines. Sensitivity analyses defined simultaneous new use as a benzodiazepine dispensed up to 30 days after antidepressant treatment initiation.
Antidepressant treatment length was defined as the number of days from antidepressant treatment initiation to discontinuation. After the date of antidepressant treatment initiation, the days’ supply was added to a 30-day grace period to allow for gaps in treatment between fills. If no subsequent prescription was dispensed in the previous prescription’s days’ supply plus the grace period, the patient was considered to have discontinued treatment at the end of that period. We highlight antidepressant treatment continuation at 6 months because guidelines recommend 6 or more months of treatment in adults with depression1 but also report results up to 2 years.
Applying a commonly used definition,21 we defined long-term benzodiazepine use as 6 months (180 days) of continuous benzodiazepine use after simultaneous new use with antidepressant treatment. We estimated benzodiazepine treatment length using a 30-day grace period; sensitivity analyses varied the grace period from a more restrictive (10 days) to a less restrictive definition (60 days). We also counted the number of benzodiazepine prescription fills before discontinuation of use.
Patient and prescribing characteristics were based on the presence of diagnostic and procedure codes and dispensed prescriptions in the year before antidepressant initiation. These characteristics included age, sex, psychiatric comorbidities (specific consideration to anxiety disorders), treated self-harm, nonpsychiatric comorbidities (included individually and not part of an index), health care use (often used as a proxy for health-seeking behavior and overall health), and region. We also included year of antidepressant treatment initiation, initial antidepressant class, and a marker for recorded psychotherapy sessions (Current Procedural Terminology psychotherapy codes) in the 30 days before antidepressant treatment initiation. Although we lack direct measures of baseline depression severity, for the index depression diagnosis we included the specific depression diagnosis, whether the index episode was diagnosed in the hospital or as an outpatient, and the physician specialty associated with the diagnosis. Because benzodiazepines have been associated with fractures22,23 and the potential harms of concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use,24-26 we included indicators for recent opioid prescriptions, prior injuries, and fall or fracture risk factors.
We characterized the initial benzodiazepine prescription in terms of days’ supply and quantity of pills dispensed, pills per day prescribed (quantity divided by days’ supply), whether the agent was long-acting (clonazepam, clorazepate, diazepam, flurazepam, or quazepam),27 and whether the dose per day (prescription strength × pills per day) was above, below, or at the modal dose. Modal dose per day was determined by the mode dose for each benzodiazepine agent. For patients with more than 1 benzodiazepine agent (0.9%) dispensed at treatment initiation or more than 1 prescription for the same agent (0.5%), we summed initial days’ supply, quantity, and pills per day values.
We estimated the proportion of simultaneous antidepressant and benzodiazepine users among all antidepressant initiators by year, stratified by age group and physician type. We estimated the mean annual increase and 95% CIs in the proportion of simultaneous new users, assuming a linear trend. Figures depicting trends were internally standardized by region, age, and sex. We used weighted survival curves to estimate antidepressant continuation by simultaneous new use status with censoring at insurance disenrollment and the end of the study period. For weighted analyses, we used stabilized-inverse probability of treatment weights with patient characteristics likely to be associated with simultaneous new use and antidepressant treatment continuation entered into the propensity score model. Among simultaneous new users, we described characteristics of the initial benzodiazepine prescription regimen overall and stratified by the physician specialty of the index depression diagnosis and estimated the survival function of continued benzodiazepine use, censoring at insurance disenrollment and the end of the study period.
We used Poisson regression with robust variance estimation28 to estimate crude risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs and multivariable RRs to identify factors independently associated with (1) simultaneous new use and (2) long-term benzodiazepine use. Because of the exploratory nature of the analysis, we included all the aforementioned patient and prescribing characteristics in the models. We then removed characteristics independently associated with less than 5% increased or decreased likelihood of (1) simultaneous new use or (2) long-term use from the full model. The C statistics for each full model are reported. Factors associated with long-term benzodiazepine use were evaluated in simultaneous new users with 6 months of follow-up.
Of the 765 130 adults (median age, 39 years; interquartile range, 29-49 years; 507 451 women [66.3%]) who started antidepressant therapy, 81 020 (10.6%) simultaneously started benzodiazepine therapy. Of adults with a recent anxiety or sleep disorder diagnosis, 20.2% were simultaneous new users compared with 8.4% without comorbid anxiety or sleep disorder.
The proportion of simultaneous new users increased from 6.1% of antidepressant initiators in 2001 to a peak of 12.5% in 2012. The mean annual increase in the proportion of simultaneous new users was 0.49% (95% CI, 0.47%-0.51%). This trend held although with different baseline frequencies when stratified by physician type and age. A higher proportion of patients diagnosed with depression by psychiatrists were simultaneous new users (2001, 8.7%; 2012, 16.1%) compared with other physician types (eg, family practice: 2001, 5.0%; 2012, 12.8%) (Figure 1). The highest mean annual change occurred among patients aged 25 to 34 years (0.70%; 95% CI, 0.65%-0.75%) and the lowest among those 18 to 24 (0.40%) and 50 to 64 (0.36%) years of age (eFigure 1 in the Supplement).
Having a recent anxiety diagnosis was the strongest determinant of simultaneous new use of a benzodiazepine (Table 1 and eTable 1 in the Supplement). Specifically, 24.1% of patients with a recent unspecified anxiety diagnosis (multivariable RR [RR], 2.58; 95% CI, 2.54-2.62) and 39.1% with a recent panic disorder diagnosis (RR, 2.67; 95% CI, 2.58-2.76) had simultaneous benzodiazepine and antidepressant new use. Simultaneous new use was more common among patients with recent insomnia or sleep disturbance diagnoses (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.28-1.34) and less common among those who received recent psychotherapy (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.81-0.85) or had a history of self-harm (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59-0.92).
In sensitivity analyses using the 30-day definition of simultaneous new use, 13.6% of antidepressant initiators were simultaneous new users. The trend from 2001 to 2014 remained, peaking at 15.7% in 2012. Strong determinants of simultaneous new use in primary analyses remained strong, with only slight alterations in their magnitude of association.
A total of 67.3% of simultaneous new users and 70.3% of non–simultaneous new users continued antidepressant treatment at 3 months; 44.3% of simultaneous new users and 47.1% of non–simultaneous new users continued to take antidepressants at 6 months. After propensity score weighting, crude imbalances between simultaneous new users and non–simultaneous new users were mitigated, but results at 6 months were unchanged (non–simultaneous new users, 47.1%; simultaneous new users, 43.9%) (Figure 2). Continued antidepressant use at 6 months was similar in the subset of adults with major depressive disorder (n = 201 969; non–simultaneous new users, 48.1%; simultaneous new users, 45.6%).
Most benzodiazepine users had an initial prescription for alprazolam (43.9%), lorazepam (26.3%), or clonazepam (21.8%). A total of 13.5% received a short benzodiazepine days’ supply (1-7 days) at the start of treatment, with variation by physician specialty (psychiatry, 6.7%; family practice, 15.1%). A total of 26.1% of simultaneous new users received more than 50 benzodiazepine pills at the start of treatment, an indication of prescribing more than 1 pill per day. We present full benzodiazepine prescription details overall and by physician in eTable 2 in the Supplement.
A total of 12.3% (95% CI, 12.0%-12.5%) of simultaneous new users received long-term benzodiazepine treatment, with 5.7% (95% CI, 5.5%-5.9%) continuing benzodiazepine therapy for 1 year. Of simultaneous new users, 6.2% under the shortened (10 days) and 22.0% under the lengthened (60 days) grace periods were defined as long-term users. The proportion of simultaneous new users becoming long-term users remained fairly stable from 2001 to 2014 (eFigure 2 in the Supplement). Among simultaneous new users with 6 months or more of insurance enrollment after the start of treatment (61 482 [75.9%]), 64.0% did not refill their initial benzodiazepine prescription, and 14.8% had 4 or more refills before treatment discontinuation (Table 2).
When simultaneously considering long-term benzodiazepine use and antidepressant treatment continuation in adults with 6-month follow-up, 34.9% continued antidepressant treatment and discontinued benzodiazepine treatment 6 months after the start of treatment, 8.3% continued both antidepressant and benzodiazepine treatment, 54.4% discontinued both antidepressant and benzodiazepine treatment, and 2.4% continued benzodiazepine treatment and discontinued antidepressant treatment.
The likelihood of becoming a long-term benzodiazepine user varied by patient and prescription characteristics (Table 3 and eTable 3 in the Supplement). Patients with an initial days’ supply of 8 to 15 days (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.30-1.64), 22 to 35 days (RR, 2.91; 95% CI, 2.54-3.33), and more than 35 days (RR, 4.90; 95% CI, 4.15-5.79; prevalence, 2%) were more likely to become long-term users than were patients with 1 to 7 days’ supply. Older adults (50-64 vs 18-24 years of age; RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.17-1.38), patients initiating a long-acting benzodiazepine (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.22-1.34), and patients diagnosed with depression by a psychiatrist vs family practitioner (RR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.27-1.47) were more likely to become long-term users. Prior poisoning (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.01-1.64) and a recent opioid prescription (RR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.39-1.61) at baseline were also associated with an increased likelihood of becoming a long-term user.
A total of 10.6% of commercially insured adults who started taking an antidepressant after a depression diagnosis simultaneously initiated benzodiazepine therapy, increasing from 6.1% in 2001 and peaking at 12.5% in 2012. We observed no clinically meaningful difference in antidepressant treatment length between simultaneous new users and non–simultaneous new users. Overall, 12.3% of simultaneous new users became long-term benzodiazepine users, an outcome more common among patients with an initial prescription for a longer benzodiazepine days' supply or long-acting benzodiazepine and recent prescription opioid fills.
Our prevalence estimates for simultaneous new use are similar to those reported in the other US population–based study19 that examines this question in a cohort of veterans with depression. Whether the increase in simultaneous new use of benzodiazepines that we observed is related to the general increase in benzodiazepine use in the US population29-31 is unclear. Perhaps the 2001 Cochrane publication (and the 2009 update) played a role because it summarized evidence on combined antidepressant and benzodiazepine use and reported increased short-term response and decreased dropout attributable to adverse effects for patients randomized to combined therapy vs an antidepressant alone (although only 1 trial lasted >8 weeks).2 Another potential factor is increased recognition of co-occurring anxiety in patients with depression.32,33 The plateau that we observed in simultaneous new use might be related to increased caution in prescribing benzodiazepines that may have followed publications26,34,35 that enumerated the potential harms of benzodiazepines when used concurrently with opioids. In addition, changes in the use of drugs used for similar indications but distinct from benzodiazepines (ie, z drugs) might have influenced observed trends in simultaneous new use of benzodiazepines.
Although the trends from 2001 to 2014 were observed across all physician types, adults diagnosed with depression by a psychiatrist were more likely to simultaneously begin new use of an antidepressant and a benzodiazepine than were adults diagnosed by other physicians. The difference between physician type might be related to psychiatrists’ increased familiarity with benzodiazepines, treatment preferences, and training; the severity of their patient’s depression or comorbid anxiety; or the possibility that patients diagnosed by psychologists are more likely to receive prescriptions from another physician because of prescribing restrictions. On the basis of proxies for depression severity available in our data, simultaneous new use may well be more common for patients with more severe depression. Because we lack direct depression severity measures, this remains speculative.
Observational studies10,19 have reported increased continuation of antidepressant therapy in patients with benzodiazepine use, similar to findings from the Cochrane review.2 A study10 of patients taking antidepressants with prior benzodiazepine use (but not specifically simultaneous new use) reported improved antidepressant therapy continuation at 1 month but without significant differences thereafter. A study19 in veterans found that simultaneous new users were more likely to have adequate acute-phase antidepressant treatment (first 90 days) compared with patients who started use of an antidepressant without a benzodiazepine. Although we cannot measure early discontinuation of antidepressant treatment during a prescription period because we rely on dispensed prescriptions and the exact time of discontinuation after the dispensing of the last prescription is unknown, antidepressant treatment continuation was similar in simultaneous new users and non–simultaneous new users.
When prescribed carefully in appropriate patients, benzodiazepines are considered to be useful medications.36 Still, the decision to simultaneously initiate benzodiazepine therapy at antidepressant therapy initiation and the preference for short-term treatment are influenced by concerns about benzodiazepines, including dependency, emergency department visits, and increased risk of fractures, motor vehicle crashes, and overdose.22-24,34,37-40 Although most benzodiazepine use among our population was in line with recommendations8 for short-term use, 12.3% of simultaneous new users became long-term benzodiazepine users (22.0% when allowing for more sporadic benzodiazepine use). In the Veterans Health Administration study, 14.1% of 3320 simultaneous new users continued benzodiazepine treatment for 1 year, more than twice our estimate of 5.7%.19 Almost one-third of long-term benzodiazepine users in our study had an index depression diagnosis from a psychiatrist, similar to findings of another US study (adults aged 18-64 years)41 in which 20% to 33% of all long-term benzodiazepine users received at least 1 benzodiazepine prescription from a psychiatrist. More emphasis on short-term use may be needed for some patients, including patients treated by non–mental health specialists.
In our study, strong determinants of long-term benzodiazepine use included potentially modifiable characteristics of the initial regimen (eg, days’ supply of the initial benzodiazepine prescription and use of long-acting agents). Future studies should focus on better understanding how days’ supply and long-acting agents contribute to prolonged benzodiazepine use. Although we did not look at whether opioid use was continued after simultaneous antidepressant and benzodiazepine new use, the association between a recent baseline opioid prescription and long-term benzodiazepine use is particularly concerning because of the known risks of concurrent use of these substances and their pharmacologic interactions.25
Some limitations should be considered. Our estimates are based on dispensed prescriptions, and we cannot account for patients who were prescribed but did not fill the benzodiazepine prescription and patients who did not actually take the dispensed medications. However, irrespective of whether the medication was taken, our results focus on the clinically relevant questions surrounding coprescribing. We used the most restrictive definition of simultaneous new use in primary analyses (prescriptions filled on the same day) and, therefore, may have underestimated clinically relevant simultaneous new use. However, trends and determinants were consistent under the more liberal definition. We restricted our study to patients who started antidepressant treatment, but some could have been treated with antidepressants in the more remote past; it is possible that prior treatment experiences not captured influenced simultaneous new use decisions. Additional unknown details surrounding benzodiazepine prescriptions include whether they were prescribed as needed and how many refills were allowed. Parameter estimates from our multivariable models of simultaneous new use and long-term benzodiazepine use should not be interpreted causally.42 In addition, our observation of no meaningful difference in antidepressant treatment length by simultaneous new use could be attributable to unmeasured confounding (eg, depression severity), misclassification, or chance.
Because we required at least a year of continuous coverage in the same health insurance plan, we could have induced a selection bias. It is possible, albeit unlikely, that those who did not meet these requirements differ in their benzodiazepine use patterns from those who we studied. Other factors that influence the generalizability include our decision to exclude patients with recorded baseline substance abuse and select psychiatric comorbidities. In addition, trends present in our data could be influenced by the underlying insurance plans that contribute to MarketScan, which varied from 2001 to 2014. Last, we cannot be certain that the antidepressant treatment was initiated for depression because of the many indications for antidepressants43 or that the antidepressant prescriber also prescribed the benzodiazepine. However, although MarketScan data cannot identify the physician associated with dispensed prescriptions, preliminary results in a validation study reveal that the physician who diagnosed the index depression is a good proxy for the physician of the initial antidepressant prescription and that most simultaneous new users received both prescriptions from the same physician (G.A.B., unpublished data, May 1, 2017).
Between 2001 and 2014, 10.6% of commercially insured adults with depression who started taking an antidepressant simultaneously started benzodiazepine therapy, with approximately twice the proportion simultaneous starting benzodiazepine treatment by the end of the study period. No clinically meaningful difference was observed in antidepressant treatment continuation in simultaneous new users compared with non–simultaneous new users. Because of the risks associated with benzodiazepines and the potentially modifiable factors associated with long-term use among simultaneous new users, the decision to simultaneously initiate benzodiazepine therapy at antidepressant therapy initiation and the benzodiazepine regimen require careful consideration of potential benefits and harms.
Corresponding Author: Greta A. Bushnell, MSPH, Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, 2106-B McGavran-Greenberg, Campus Box 7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435 (email@example.com).
Accepted for Publication: April 18, 2017.
Published Online: June 7, 2017. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1273
Author Contributions: Ms Bushnell had full access to the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: All authors.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: Bushnell.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: Bushnell, Stürmer, Gaynes.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Stürmer, Pate.
Study supervision: Stürmer, Gaynes, Miller.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Ms Bushnell reported previously holding a graduate research assistantship with GlaxoSmithKline and receiving funding through the Center for Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Epidemiology University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health (both ended in December 2015). Dr Stürmer reported receiving salary support as Director of the Center for Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Epidemiology University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health (current members: GlaxoSmithKline, UCB BioSciences, and Merck); receiving research support from pharmaceutical companies (Amgen, AstraZeneca) to the Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; and owning stock in Novartis, Roche, BASF, AstraZeneca, and Novo Nordisk. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: Ms Bushnell received support from grant F31MH107085 from the National Institute of Mental Health as a Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award Individual Predoctoral Fellow. The database infrastructure used for this project was funded by the Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health; the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina; grant UL1TR001111 from the CER Strategic Initiative of University of North Carolina’s Clinical Translational Science Award; and the University of North Carolina School of Medicine.
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Meeting Presentation: Part of this work was presented as an oral presentation at the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology 32nd International Conference; August 27, 2016; Dublin, Ireland.
Create a personal account or sign in to: