In Reply We thank Faltinsen and colleagues for their judicious comments on our meta-analysis1 and will hereby address each point. The authors underscore the lack of a registered protocol, which we fully acknowledge as a limitation. However, as meta-analyses deal with secondary observational data, the potential pernicious influence of investigator biases might be lessened. The authors maintain selective reporting in systematic reviews is widespread, but cite evidence pertaining primarily to inadequate harm reporting in primary trials included in systematic reviews, rather than in reviews themselves. For these, the evidence for selective outcome reporting and its association with outcomes is mixed.2 Nevertheless, for full transparency, we made all extracted data publicly available (https://figshare.com/articles/Data_for_Cristea_et_al_2017_JAMA_Psychiatry/4892111).
Cristea IA, Barbui C, Cuijpers P. Reviews and Meta-analyses of Psychotherapy Efficacy for Borderline Personality Disorder—Reply. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(8):854–855. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1403
Monkeypox Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.