For more than 20 years, there have been rumbles about banning the P value,1-3 because it is so often misused, miscomputed, and, even when used and computed correctly, misinterpreted. Consequently, findings that affect medical decision-making, policy, and research are often misled by the very research that is supposed to provide their evidence base.4 Recently, such rumbles have increased.5-7 Is now the time to ban the P value in all medical research?
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Kraemer HC. Is It Time to Ban the P Value? JAMA Psychiatry. Published online August 07, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1965
Browse and subscribe to JAMA Network podcasts!
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: