In this issue of JAMA Psychiatry, Brandt et al1 present what is, to my knowledge, the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of nonaffective psychosis in first-generation and second-generation refugees. The nonaffective psychoses include schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorders, and schizophreniform disorders (and exclude affective psychoses, such as in depression, mania, and bipolar disorder), and the results showed significant and consistent increases in relative risks among refugees (1.39 [95% CI, 1.23-1.58] and 2.41 [95% CI, 1.51-3.85] compared with nonrefugee migrants and the native population, respectively). The risk of bias of studies was assessed using validated tools, and several sensitivity and additional analyses were performed in which results were robust.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Sundquist K. A Finding of Increased Risk of Nonaffective Psychosis in Refugees That Is Highly Relevant to the Current Worldwide Refugee Crisis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(11):1118–1119. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1927
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: