[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 2,793
Citations 0
Viewpoint
September 2, 2020

Balancing the Public Health Costs of Psychosis vs Mass Incarceration With the Legalization of Cannabis

Author Affiliations
  • 1Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York, New York
  • 2Departments of Psychology, Psychiatry, and Medical Social Sciences, Institutes for Policy Research and Innovations in Developmental Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
  • 3Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore
  • 4Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine
JAMA Psychiatry. Published online September 2, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2591

As of July 2020, 11 states in the US had legalized the recreational use of cannabis and 16 others had decriminalized it, with all but 2 of the remaining 23 states allowing some form of legal use for medical purposes. Although this progressive shift in cannabis legislation has been applauded by many, there has been increasing concern among some in the medical and health care professions that the potential mental health risks of cannabis use are being downplayed or ignored. A recent Viewpoint in JAMA Psychiatry suggests that legalizing cannabis may be associated with increased incidence and prevalence of psychosis.1 Assuming an increase in use, epidemiologic research supports the association of cannabis with psychosis because there is convincing evidence that high-potency (>10% tetrahydrocannabinol) cannabis taken at frequent doses may be associated with nontransient cases of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.2 While we take seriously the concern that increased use of cannabis or use of higher-potency cannabis may be associated with increased incidence and prevalence of psychosis at the population level as well as its potential association with other factors, such as cognition and educational attainment, there may also be important and unintended consequences to criminalization of cannabis possession and use.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×