Shared decision making (SDM) is a health communication approach focusing on patient-clinician interactions around treatment decisions, with the goals of improving clinical and functional outcomes and providing personalized care.1 The fundamental principles of SDM involve (1) eliminating power asymmetries between clinician and patient; (2) acknowledging that there are at least 2 expert participants: a patient having lived-experience expertise, a clinician having professional expertise, and sometimes a family member2; (3) eliciting patient preferences for their involvement in the decision-making (autonomously, conjointly with clinician input, letting clinician make decisions) and eliciting the patient’s specific values that could guide the decision (eg, reducing medication adverse effects); (4) discussing at least 2 treatment options (eg, taking, tapering, or stopping antipsychotic medications); (5) making a decision that aligns with the patient’s goals, preferences, and values that also makes clear the risks involved in particular decisions3; and (6) accepting that the patient’s choice of treatment plan may differ from the clinician’s recommendation. SDM has been endorsed as the gold standard of patient-clinician interaction in preference-based care by the National Academy of Medicine in the US and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in the UK. Studies in the last decade of individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) demonstrating the feasibility of using SDM, and showing the potential for improved outcomes, support the recent acknowledgment of SDM as an essential practice by the American Psychiatric Association4 and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Zisman-Ilani Y, Roth RM, Mistler LA. Time to Support Extensive Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Psychiatry. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(11):1183–1184. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2247
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.