This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
This study seems to be much ado about very little and tends to show that Sigmund Freud was very careless and inaccurate, hardly a new or startling discovery since Freud remarked that he was often very sloppy.
It concerns the case of Johann Christoph Haizmann, a destitute painter who was born in Traunstein, Bavaria, in 1652, and having lost a parent, supposedly made two bonds with the devil, one in the year 1668, written in ink, the other in 1669 written in blood. From the study of the available documents, mainly a folk-song about the painter, a brief account by Father G. Petschacher, and a collection of documents compiled by Father A. Eremiasch, Freud made a psychoanalytical study of the case, arriving at the conclusion that the illness should be interpreted as a conflict over unconscious homosexuality, that is in terms of the father-complex, an interpretation which he made also
Bailey P. The Parapraxis in the Haizmann Case of Sigmund Freud. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1966;14(1):109. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1966.01730070111016
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: