—We would like to respond to the number of comments on the design and findings of our study, and also to their "flexible system" for the diagnosis of schizophrenia that Carpenter et al presented. We are puzzled by some of the things they say. We had assumed that their flexible system was intended to be an operational definition of schizophrenia that was analogous to those proposed by Feighner, Astrachan, and Spitzer, and in fact we found it to be a more effective predictor of poor outcome than several of the other definitions we studied. They now say, however, that "it is not a free-standing system for identifying schizophrenic patients or for differential diagnosis" and that "it must be embedded in a broad clinical diagnostic evaluation." They are, of course, perfectly entitled to insist that their system should only be used in this way. But if they do intend it to
Kendell RE, Leff JP. Diagnostic Systems and Prognostic Validity-Reply. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1980;37(2):229. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780150119014
* * SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE * *
The JAMA Network Sites will be conducting routine maintenance from 10/20/2017 through 10/21/2017. During this window access to content and authentication may be intermittently available. The JAMA Store will be completely unavailable during the maintenance window.