To the Editor.—
McGuffin et al1 used what they purported to be our criteria for schizophrenia and found them to be unreliable and "unsatisfactory for detecting the familiality of schizophrenia." Our response is as follows.1. We substantially revised our criteria in 19782 by adding the requirements of first-rank symptoms and a clear consciousness to the inclusion criteria, and the presence of diagnosable affective disorder to the exclusion criteria, and by requiring the presence of only one (rather than all three) inclusion criterion for a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Nonetheless, McGuffin et al chose to use our 1975 criteria3; what was their rationale for doing so?2. Our 1975 criteria were not accurately portrayed by McGuffin et al. We nowhere referred to "incoherent speech," but specified "blocking, nonsequiturs, neologisms, word approximations, and verbigeration" as the types of formal thought disorder required. A "restricted affect" alone could not satisfy our
Abrams R, Taylor MA. The Appropriate Use of Criteria for Schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42(4):422–423. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790270112015
Browse and subscribe to JAMA Network podcasts!
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: