Drs Abrams and Taylor have taken umbrage with our reply to their letter in the April 1985 issue of the Archives and we are glad of the opportunity to comment on the points they have made.1. Abrams and Taylor stated at the beginning of their 1983 article1 that they did recognize the difference between the terms "familial" and "genetic." However, readers must judge for themselves whether the authors have maintained the distinction satisfactorily in the body of the paper. We remain unconvinced.2. It is a simple matter of logic that inclusion criteria of the form A and B and C (Abrams and Taylor version 1) are radically different from criteria of the form A or B or C (version 2). We will not belabor this point, which must be self-evident. However, it is worth noting that in the Taylor and Abrams study, the increase in
McGuffin P, Gottesman II, Murray RM, Reveley AM. Bruised Toes in Schizophrenia? An Exchange-Reply. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986;43(3):295–296. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800030113015
Browse and subscribe to JAMA Network podcasts!
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: