Context While young racial/ethnic groups are the fastest growing population in the United States, data about substance-related disorders among adolescents of various racial/ethnic backgrounds are lacking.
Objective To examine the magnitude of past-year DSM-IV substance-related disorders (alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, inhalants, hallucinogens, heroin, analgesic opioids, stimulants, sedatives, and tranquilizers) among adolescents of white, Hispanic, African American, Native American, Asian or Pacific Islander, and multiple race/ethnicity.
Design The 2005 to 2008 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.
Setting Academic research.
Participants Noninstitutionalized household adolescents aged 12 to 17 years.
Main Outcome Measures Substance-related disorders were assessed by standardized survey questions administered using the audio computer–assisted self-interviewing method.
Results Of 72 561 adolescents aged 12 to 17 years, 37.0% used alcohol or drugs in the past year; 7.9% met criteria for a substance-related disorder, with Native Americans having the highest prevalence of use (47.5%) and disorder (15.0%). Analgesic opioids were the second most commonly used illegal drugs, following marijuana, in all racial/ethnic groups; analgesic opioid use was comparatively prevalent among adolescents of Native American (9.7%) and multiple race/ethnicity (8.8%). Among 27 705 past-year alcohol or drug users, Native Americans (31.5%), adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity (25.2%), adolescents of white race/ethnicity (22.9%), and Hispanics (21.0%) had the highest rates of substance-related disorders. Adolescents used marijuana more frequently than alcohol or other drugs, and 25.9% of marijuana users met criteria for marijuana abuse or dependence. After controlling for adolescents' age, socioeconomic variables, population density of residence, self-rated health, and survey year, adjusted analyses of adolescent substance users indicated elevated odds of substance-related disorders among Native Americans, adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity, adolescents of white race/ethnicity, and Hispanics compared with African Americans; African Americans did not differ from Asians or Pacific Islanders.
Conclusions Substance use is widespread among adolescents of Native American, white, Hispanic, and multiple race/ethnicity. These groups also are disproportionately affected by substance-related disorders.
Problematic alcohol and drug use in adolescence has a negative influence on the affected individuals, their families, and society.1 Because psychoactive drugs alter neurotransmission in the brain, repeated use could have long-lasting adverse effects on brain development and overall health.2-4 Early substance use confers a heightened risk for addiction, psychiatric and medical disorders, poor psychosocial functioning, treatment needs, and mortality.1-9 Adolescence marks the period of life with the highest risk for initiating substance use10; thus, adolescents constitute a high-risk group requiring research to guide prevention efforts and health policy making. Furthermore, there is a growing need for understanding substance-related disorders among adolescents of various racial/ethnic backgrounds to track health statistics, plan for and improve health services, and identify vulnerable subgroups for focused intervention. Children and adolescents of nonwhite race/ethnicity are the fastest growing population; by 2030, adolescents of nonwhite race/ethnicity are projected to represent more than half of the US population younger than 18 years.11 Therefore, many adolescents at risk to begin substance use will be of nonwhite race/ethnicity. For example, young Hispanics, the fastest growing racial/ethnic group in the United States, have an elevated risk for substance use.11-14
While eliminating racial/ethnic disparities in health problems and their treatment is a mission of the National Institutes of Health, few data about substance-related disorders exist for young groups of nonwhite race/ethnicity. Investigations of adolescents have focused primarily on substance use among students, and assessments for substance-related disorders are not included in school-based surveys; when researchers have examined substance-related disorders, data are frequently limited to alcohol, marijuana, or cocaine, resulting in a lack of data on other drug use disorders.15-19 In addition, sample sizes of studies are often inadequate for examining young Asians, Native Americans, and groups of multiple race/ethnicity. The 2000 Census was the first US Census to include the classification of multiple race/ethnicity,12 and data about substance-related disorders for this group are lacking. Results about“substance use” also are limited for discerning important differences in substance use problems across racial/ethnic groups. An improved measure of substance use problems, such as that provided by the DSM-IV,20 is needed to better inform research, intervention, and health policy making.
Furthermore, although investigators have reported racial/ethnic differences in substance use, findings of racial/ethnic differences in problems related to various substances are inconsistent and sometimes difficult to interpret.15 These discrepancies relate to various definitions of substance use and at-risk groups (the denominators) used.15 Some investigations have examined substance use problems in a total sample, while others have compared them among subgroups of substance users. These variations in study designs complicate efforts to compare substance use problems among racial/ethnic groups and across substance classes. Moreover, US surveys have shown a shifting pattern of substance use. Data suggest that from 1999-2000, nonmedical analgesic opioid use has increased to become more prevalent than inhalant use among adolescents; from 2002 to 2009, past-month use ranged from 2.3% to 3.2% for nonmedical analgesic opioids compared with 1.0% to 1.3% for inhalants.10,21-23 In addition, marijuana use has been increasing after a few years of decline; alcohol use and cigarette smoking among adolescents have declined.10,24,25 These changing patterns warrant research to identify racial/ethnic groups disproportionately affected by prescription drug or marijuana use and reveal a need to evaluate the comprehensive patterns of substance-related disorders affecting various groups.10,25
In response to the growing population of adolescents of nonwhite race/ethnicity, the scarcity of substance-related disorder estimates, and shifting patterns of substance use, we examine data from the 2005 to 2008 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) to fill this critical gap in substance-related disorder estimates for young racial/ethnic groups. The NSDUH is a large ongoing survey, serving as the primary source for national estimates of substance use and substance-related disorders for the noninstitutionalized US population.10 The selected years included designs that allowed the use of pooled data to examine alcohol and 9 drug use disorders across racial/ethnic groups and to compare the conditional probability of substance-related disorders among adolescent substance users. Multiple years of substance-related disorder data assessed by the same instrument help identify the extent of overlooked substance-related disorders (prescription drug use disorders) for understudied groups (ie, Asian, Native American, and multiple race/ethnicity). To address the limitation of studies with complicated comparisons of racial/ethnic differences owing to various denominators or definitions of substance use, we focus on past-year substance use and substance-related disorders, as they are better indicators of recent or active substance use and treatment needs than lifetime measures.
To better inform etiological efforts, we expand on studies of substance use by examining the frequency of each substance used and conditional probabilities of substance-related disorders to characterize use patterns and identify subsets of adolescent users showing elevated odds of having the disorder. The conditional prevalence of substance-related disorders considers substance-specific variations in use by restricting the denominator for each substance-related disorder to adolescent users of the corresponding substance, thereby allowing comparisons across substances. To mitigate for the confounding effects on associations between race/ethnicity and substance use status, included as control variables were adolescents' age, sex, family income, population density of residence (adjusting for potential effects associated with community economic characteristics, drug-using peers, and availability of substances), and self-rated health (adjusting for potential effects associated with adolescents' substance use and health status), as well as the survey year.10,14,26-30
The following 3 main questions are addressed: (1) Are there racial/ethnic differences in the 1-year prevalence of substance-related disorders? (2) Are there racial/ethnic differences in the 1-year conditional prevalence of substance-related disorders among past-year adolescent users of each corresponding substance class? (3) To what extent is racial/ethnic status associated with each substance-related disorder among adolescent substance users after controlling for potentially confounding effects of adolescents' age, sex, family income, population density of residence, self-rated health, and survey year?
This study was approved by the Duke University Institutional Review Board, Durham, North Carolina. Data were from the public use NSDUH data file from 2005 to 2008, the only survey designed to provide ongoing national estimates of substance use and substance-related disorders in the United States.31,32 The target population includes residents of households from the 50 states (including shelters, rooming houses, and group homes) and civilians residing on military bases. Participants are selected by multistage area probability methods to ensure that each independent cross-sectional sample is representative of persons aged 12 years or older. The design oversampled people aged 12 to 25 years; because of a large sample size, there was no need to oversample racial/ethnic groups (as was done before 1999).31,32 Detailed information on sample designs is provided by Morton et al.33
Prospective respondents are assured that their names will not be recorded and their responses will be kept strictly confidential. All study procedures and protections are carefully explained. For adolescents aged 12 to 17 years, the field interviewer first seeks verbal consent from their parents or guardians. Once parental permission is granted, field interviewers then approach the adolescents and obtain their agreement to participate in the study. Parents are asked to leave the interview setting to ensure the confidentiality of their children's responses.
The interview uses computer-assisted interviewing to increase the likelihood of valid respondent reports of substance use behaviors.31,32 Sociodemographic questions are administered by interviewers using computer-assisted personal interviewing. Other questions of a sensitive nature (substance use, substance-related disorders, and health) are administered using audio computer–assisted self-interviewing, which provides respondents with a highly confidential means of responding to questions to increase honest reporting of sensitive behaviors. Respondents read questions on the computer screen, or questions are read to them through headphones, and they enter responses directly into a computer provided by the interviewer.
From 2005 to 2008, approximately 67 500 unique persons aged 12 years or older were interviewed annually (weighted interviewing response rates for adolescents aged 12-17 years, 85%-87%).31,32 This study examined adolescents aged 12 to 17 years (18 678 in 2005, 18 314 in 2006, 17 727 in 2007, and 17 842 in 2008). Four years of data (n = 72 561) were pooled to allow the detection of differences in substance-related disorders among racial/ethnic groups.
The survey asked each respondent about his or her use of alcohol and 9 drug classes (inhalant use and illicit use of marijuana or hashish, cocaine or crack, hallucinogens, or heroin, as well as nonmedical use of prescription analgesic opioids, stimulants or amphetamines, sedatives, or tranquilizers). Nonmedical use was defined as the use without a prescription or for the experience or feeling the drugs caused; the use of over-the-counter drugs and legitimate use of prescription drugs were excluded.22,31,32 Alcohol and drug classes were assessed by discrete questions in 10 different sections. Each included a detailed description of the substance class and a list of substances belonging to the class. For nonmedical use, respondents were provided with pill cards showing color pictures of tablets for analgesic opioids, stimulants, sedatives, or tranquilizers (the computer screen prompts the respondent to obtain pill cards from the interviewer). To determine the extent of co-use of alcohol and drugs, users of both alcohol and a drug were categorized.
DSM-IV Substance-Related Disorders (Abuse and Dependence)
Respondents who reported alcohol or drug use in the past year were asked a set of structured substance-specific questions designed to operationalize DSM-IV criteria for abuse (role interference, hazardous use, problems with the law, and relationship problems) and dependence (tolerance, withdrawal, taking larger amounts or taking them for longer periods, inability to cut down, time spent using the substance, giving up activities, and continued use despite problems) in the past year.20,31,32 Dependence on a given substance class included users who met at least 3 dependence criteria for that class in the past year. Abuse applied to users who met at least 1 abuse criterion but did not meet criteria for dependence on that substance class; abuse and dependence were mutually exclusive.20,31,32 Assessments were adopted from questions used in the National Comorbidity Survey; as part of an ongoing process to improve the survey, diagnostic questions were cognitively tested to determine how well they were understood by respondents, were evaluated by experts to determine how well the questions captured the DSM-IV criteria, and were modified for DSM-IV criteria.34 The substance-related disorder questions were implemented and assessed using the computer-assisted self-interviewing method.
Examined were adolescents' age, sex, family income, population density of residence, self-rated health, and self-reported race/ethnicity (59.9% white, 18.2% Hispanic, 15.3% African American, 4.4% Asian or Pacific Islander, 1.7% multiple race/ethnicity, and 0.6% Native American [American Indian or Alaska Native]).12,26-30,32 Population density was based on 2000 Census data and the June 2003 Core-Based Statistical Area classifications and was categorized as large metropolitan (≥1 million population), small metropolitan (<1 million population), or nonmetropolitan (not in a Core-Based Statistical Area). Owing to the nature of a national sample, population density of residence (a proxy for community location) was included as a control variable. Self-rated health (fair or poor vs excellent, very good, or good) was assessed using a widely supported measure of general health (“Would you say your health, in general, is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?”).28-30
The distributions of race/ethnicity by survey year and racial/ethnic differences in sociodemographics were determined byχ2 test. The prevalence rates of substance use and substance-related disorders by race/ethnicity were determined. The conditional prevalence rates of substance-related disorders among adolescent users of each substance class were compared by race/ethnicity. To evaluate conditional rates of substance-related disorders among substance users, the frequency of substance use among past-year users was calculated. Logistic regression analyses estimated associations between race/ethnicity and each substance-related disorder among adolescent users of that substance. Age, sex, family income, population density of residence, self-rated health, and survey year were adjusted in the analyses to mitigate for their confounding effects on associations between race/ethnicity and each substance-related disorder.10,12,26-30 Analyses were conducted using commercially available software (SUDAAN, Release 9.0; Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina), considering the complex designs, such as weighting and clustering, of the NSDUH.35 All results are weighted except for sample sizes (unweighted).
There were no yearly differences in the distribution of racial/ethnic groups among 72 561 adolescents. Compared with other racial/ethnic groups, more adolescents aged 12 to 13 years were among Hispanics and among those of multiple race/ethnicity (eTable 1). More African Americans (63.8%), Hispanics (56.7%), and Native Americans (56.2%) were in the lowest annual income group (<$40 000) compared with other racial/ethnic groups (range, 25.7%-37.7%) (eTable 1). Most Asians or Pacific Islanders (75.9%), African Americans (63.8%), and Hispanics (63.5%) resided in large metropolitan areas, while Native Americans were more likely to reside in nonmetropolitan areas (34.4%). More Native Americans (6.8%), African Americans (4.9%), and Hispanics (4.9%) reported poor or fair health than adolescents of white race/ethnicity (3.1%).
Prevalence of substance use
Overall, 37.0% (n = 27 705) of adolescents used alcohol or drugs in the past year (32% any alcohol, 19% any illicit or nonmedical drugs, and 15% alcohol and drugs). Of all drug classes, the use of marijuana (13% of all adolescents) or analgesic opioids (7%) was more prevalent than the use of other drugs (range, 0.1%-4%). Native Americans had the highest prevalence of substance-related use (47.5%); Native Americans (20.5%), adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity (18.1%), and adolescents of white race/ethnicity (16.2%) had a higher prevalence of using both alcohol and drugs than other groups (Table). For all racial/ethnic groups, there was an age-related increase in alcohol or drug use (eTable 2).
Prevalence of substance-related disorders
Among all adolescents aged 12 to 17 years, 7.9% (n = 6166) met criteria for a substance-related disorder, and 2.0% met criteria for both substance-related disorders in the past year (5.4% any alcohol use disorder and 4.6% any drug use disorder). Marijuana (3.4%) and analgesic opioid (1.2%) use disorders were the most prevalent drug use disorders. The prevalence of various substance-related disorders is summarized in eTable 3. Native Americans had the highest prevalence of substance-related disorder (15.0%), followed by adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity (9.2%), adolescents of white race/ethnicity (9.0%), Hispanics (7.7%), African Americans (5.0%), and Asians or Pacific Islanders (3.5%) (Figure 1).
Conditional prevalence of substance-related disorders among substance users
Conditional rates of substance-related disorders (the prevalence of substance-related disorders among users of the corresponding substance), suggesting the substance-specific liability for having a substance-related disorder among users, showed that 21.5% of past-year alcohol or drug users met criteria for a substance-related disorder (Figure 2). Marijuana (25.9% of marijuana users), heroin (26.4%), cocaine (23.4%), and sedative (22.8%) use demonstrated similarly high conditional rates. Among alcohol users, 16.7% had an alcohol use disorder.
Substance-specific frequency of use helps in interpreting conditional rates (Figure 3). Marijuana users on average spent the highest mean number of days per year using the drug (79 days), followed by stimulant users (47 days), analgesic opioid users (39 days), alcohol users (36 days), sedative users (35 days), heroin users (33 days), tranquilizer users (33 days), cocaine users (31 days), inhalant users (29 days), and hallucinogen users (20 days). Substance-specific frequency of use by race/ethnicity is summarized in eTable 4.
Racial/ethnic differences in conditional prevalence of substance-related disorders
There were notable racial/ethnic differences in the conditional prevalence of various substance-related disorders (eTable 5). Among alcohol or drug users (n = 27 705), Native Americans (31.5%) and adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity (25.2%) exhibited comparatively high conditional rates of any substance-related disorder (Figure 4). Native American users had a higher conditional rate of any substance-related disorder than adolescents of white race/ethnicity (22.9%), Hispanics (21.0%), African Americans (15.5%), and Asians or Pacific Islanders (14.9%). Adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity (19.4%), Hispanics (16.2%), and adolescents of white race/ethnicity (14.3%) had higher conditional rates of comorbid alcohol and drug use disorders than African Americans (8.3%).
Conditional prevalence of abuse vs dependence among substance users
In response to recent findings showing that nonwhite adults are more likely than those of white race/ethnicity to have dependence than abuse,36 conditional rates of abuse were distinguished from conditional rates of dependence to discern whether dependence disproportionately affected adolescents of nonwhite race/ethnicity (eTable 6). Among alcohol users, a higher prevalence of alcohol abuse vs alcohol dependence was more common among adolescents of white race/ethnicity (11.4% vs 6.5%, P < .05) and Hispanics (10.4% vs 6.7%, P < .05). Among any drug users, Asians or Pacific Islanders (12.8% vs 4.3%, P < .05) and adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity (18.4% vs 8.9%, P < .05) were more likely to have drug dependence vs drug abuse. White inhalant users were more likely to have inhalant abuse than inhalant dependence (6.5% vs 3.2%, P < .05). Given the scarcity of information about substance-using adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity, their sociodemographic characteristics were explored (eTable 7).
Adjusted odds ratios of substance-related disorders among substance users
Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine whether substance-using adolescents of white race/ethnicity, Native Americans, adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity, or Hispanics showed a higher likelihood of having substance-related disorders than substance-using African Americans, adjusting for age, sex, family income, population density of residence, self-rated health, and survey year (eTable 8). Adolescents of white race/ethnicity, Native Americans, adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity, and Hispanics had greater odds than African Americans of having alcohol, any drug, and comorbid alcohol and drug use disorders (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] range, 1.35-3.36). Multiple-race adolescents (aOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.21-4.81), adolescents of white race/ethnicity (1.46; 1.02-2.07), and Hispanics (1.63; 1.07-2.49) also had greater odds than African Americans of having an analgesic opioid use disorder. Compared with those aged 16 to 17 years, these analyses also showed an age-related increase in alcohol use disorders (aOR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.37-0.54 for ages 12-13 years; and 0.72; 0.66-0.79 for ages 14-15 years) and any drug use disorders (0.36, 0.29-0.44 for ages 12-13 years; and 0.83; 0.74-0.93 for ages 14-15 years). Poor or fair health was associated with increased odds of any substance-related disorder (aOR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.39-1.86), comorbid alcohol and drug disorders (1.36; 1.09-1.70), or any drug use disorder (1.69; 1.44-2.00). Large metropolitan residence was associated with reduced odds of alcohol use disorders compared with nonmetropolitan residence (aOR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70-0.99).
Finally, we explored whether the association between race/ethnicity and substance-related disorder might be influenced by differences in frequency of use across racial/ethnic groups by adjusting the frequency of use of the corresponding substance for each model. All results showed minimal changes on aORs.
This study documents national estimates of past-year substance-related disorders among adolescents aged 12 to 17 years. The findings should prove useful to concerned citizens, health professionals, researchers, and health policy experts. First, past-year alcohol or drug use is widespread (37.0%), and about 1 in 12 adolescents self-reported having a substance-related disorder, with Native Americans showing the highest prevalence of use and disorders. Second, analgesic opioids have replaced inhalants as the second most commonly used drug (following marijuana), and analgesic opioid use disorders comprise the second most prevalent illicit drug use disorder. Third, close to one-fourth of adolescent alcohol or drug users met DSM-IV criteria for a substance-related disorder, and users of marijuana, heroin, cocaine, or sedatives showed an elevated rate of abuse or dependence on these drugs. Fourth, adolescents used marijuana more frequently than alcohol or other drugs. Fifth, adolescents of Native American, white, Hispanic, and multiple race/ethnicity are disproportionately affected by substance-related disorders.
High rates of substance-related disorders among adolescents of native american, white, hispanic, and multiple race/ethnicity
Prior school-based investigations have not assessed substance-related disorders; prescription drug problems were not a major concern, and data for adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity were unavailable.17,18,37 The growing sizes of racial/ethnic groups, plus the elevated rate of prescription drug use problems, necessitate updated and systematic research to discern intervention needs across these groups.11,13,38 This study expands on earlier studies by including school dropouts and adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity, examining substance-related disorders to improve measures of substance use burden, and presenting new data on all available substance-related disorders to make direct comparisons of indicators of intervention needs across racial/ethnic groups. In addition to supporting a high prevalence of substance use among those of Native Americans, white, and Hispanic race/ethnicity,17,18,37 adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity were found to have the second highest prevalence of alcohol use (following those of white race/ethnicity) and any drug use (following Native Americans). Close to one-tenth of adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity self-reported having a substance-related disorder, and one-fourth of substance-using adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity exhibited a substance-related disorder. These estimates were as high as those for adolescents of Native American, white, and Hispanic race/ethnicity. These 4 groups are disproportionately affected by symptoms of substance-related disorders.
When distinguishing abuse from dependence,36 drug-using adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity exhibited a higher prevalence of dependence than abuse, suggesting that substance use problems could be a unique challenge for research and intervention as this population grows.11,12 While substance use is influenced by multiple peer, individual (depression and delinquency), family (poor parenting), school (location), and community (neighborhood deterioration) domains,39-42 research also has identified cultural-specific risk (greater acculturation) and protective correlates (cultural pride and ethnic/racial identity) for substance use, suggesting that cultural-specific issues should be addressed for interventions to be effective.13,14,43-45 However, cultural-related factors have yet to be investigated for adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity. About 2% of the US population are of multiple race/ethnicity, which includes 3 subgroups of similar size (white and African American, white and Native American, and white and Asian or Pacific Islander) and a small subgroup self-identifying themselves as more than 3 races/ethnicities.46 Heterogeneous cultural backgrounds of individuals of multiple race/ethnicity emphasize the need for multidisciplinary approaches to disentangle cultural related factors that can guide prevention and treatment.12,14,47
Native american adolescents require concerted research and intervention efforts
Another concern is the high rate of substance-related disorders among Native Americans. Consistent with earlier studies,17,37,48 Native Americans showed the highest prevalence of substance-related use (47.5%). Native Americans also demonstrated the highest rate of substance-related disorder (15.0%); among past-year substance-using Native Americans, 31.5% met criteria for a substance-related disorder. In a sample of 651 indigenous adolescents from a single culture in the northern United States and Canada aged 13 to 15 years, Whitbeck et al49 found that 12.7% self-reported having a past-year alcohol use disorder, and 15.4% had a past-year marijuana use disorder. However, there is a scarcity of research on young Native Americans who obtain addiction treatment.50 Given that this population is generally younger (39% are<20 years) and poorer than other ethnic/racial groups,51 young Native Americans have great need for intervention to reduce burdens from substance use. There are 562 federally recognized American Indian tribes in the United States; the cultural diversity and geographic dispersion of these tribes have important implications for research and service provision, requiring policy support to develop culturally appropriate interventions to improve their health.52-54
Marijuana and analgesic opioids constitute the primary drugs of abuse
The results also support rising concerns about adolescent marijuana use.25 Marijuana use disorders constituted 74.0% of all illicit or nonmedical substance-related disorders, and 25.9% of marijuana users exhibited a marijuana use disorder, which (along with heroin, cocaine, and sedatives) represented the highest conditional rate of substance-related disorders. The high rate can be related to frequency of use, as marijuana users (on average) spent the most days using the drug compared with other substance users. This is the first known study to present such findings for all substance classes, and it reveals cause for concern owing to the large number of past-year marijuana users (13.0% of all adolescents), a recent increase in marijuana use, increased levels of marijuana potency, and potential adverse effects on adolescents' health and subsequent productivity.24,25,55,56 Research is needed to closely monitor marijuana use and associated disorders among adolescents and identify prevention programs that truly work.
Lastly, analgesic opioids constitute the second most commonly used illicit drug among all racial/ethnic groups, with adolescents of Native American, white, and multiple race/ethnicity showing comparatively high rates of use. The large sample helped identify analgesic opioid-using adolescents of these racial/ethnic groups exhibiting elevated odds of analgesic opioid use disorders. Compared with results from earlier studies,17,37,48 findings herein support an elevated rate of nonmedical analgesic opioid use and analgesic opioid-related problems across various racial/ethnic groups. This finding is consistent with evidence showing that one-fourth of users of nonmedical analgesic opioids aged 12 to 17 years had never used other illicit or nonmedical drugs22 and that adolescents have generally considered analgesic opioids safer and easier to get than illicit drugs, and reported parents' medicine cabinets, family members, or friends as primary sources.57,58 Unfortunately, analgesic opioids are among the most addictive and lethal drugs when used improperly.59,60 Clearly, educational or prevention interventions should incorporate effective messages about health risk for nonmedical use or abuse of prescription drugs, and screening for nonmedical drug use should be considered for high-risk adolescents.
Limitations and strengths
These findings should be interpreted with caution. The NSDUH relies on self-reports, which can be influenced by memory error and underreporting. As in other surveys, substance-related disorders are surveyed in the NSDUH based on standardized questions designed to operationalize DSM-IV criteria for substance-related disorders; these rates are self-reported estimates, not clinical diagnoses. Of note, the NSDUH-based past-year 6.7% prevalence of substance-related disorders (alcohol or drug) among adults in 2000 resembled the 7.4% prevalence of substance-related disorders among adults in the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey.34 Findings also do not apply to institutionalized or homeless adolescents, who were not included in the NSDUH. Nicotine dependence is excluded because it was not based on DSM-IV criteria; hence, adolescents' substance-related disorder problems are greater than our findings have suggested. This study also does not address the influence of community-level poverty or intraethnic differences (eg, differences among Hispanic groups) in substance-related disorders, as detailed measures are unavailable.13,39,43,61 Given the increasing cultural diversity of the US population, the availability of data sets for specific racial/ethnic groups and community-level poverty in future NSDUH would make it possible to monitor disparities in substance-related disorders for heterogeneous racial/ethnic groups.
The NSDUH also has noteworthy strengths. These results have a higher level of generalizability than those of a regional sample owing to high response rates and the large sample consisting of students and nonstudents or school dropouts. The 3.8% proportion of nonstudents or school dropouts among adolescents aged 16 to 17 years in this sample was similar to the 3.9% proportion of dropouts among US public high school students.62 While the US Census does not provide detailed information about racial/ethnic groups for adolescents aged 12 to 17 years, this study's distributions resemble those of all ages in the United States among groups of Native American (0.6% vs 0.7%), Asian or Pacific Islander (4.4% vs 4.4%), and multiple (1.7% vs 1.6%) race/ethnicity.46
Furthermore, based on continuous research efforts and enhancements to improve national substance-related disorder estimates, the NSDUH uses the most sophisticated survey methods available to improve the quality of self-reported data (detailed probes, color pictures of prescription drugs to augment assessments for substance use, and computer-assisted self-administration interviewing and anonymous data collection to enhance privacy).31 A large reliability study63 found substantial (for abuse or dependence questions) to almost perfect (for cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use questions) response agreement for key NSDUH measures; another NSDUH validity study64 revealed high agreement between self-reported use and urine drug test results (84.6% for tobacco, 89.8% for marijuana, and 95.5% for cocaine). The trend data of the NSDUH on various drug use patterns among adolescents are remarkably consistent with trend data from Monitoring the Future.10,31 Given the growing diversity and size of the young population and the scarcity of substance-related disorder indicators, this study makes a unique contribution by providing new information to elucidate the magnitude of illicit and prescription drug use disorders for understudied Asians or Pacific Islanders, Native Americans, Hispanics, and African Americans.
Native Americans have the highest prevalence of substance use and substance-related disorders, adding to evidence that young Native Americans are a vulnerable group facing numerous stressors, trauma, and health disparities (eg, highest rate of suicide, underfunded systems of care, and lack of access to appropriate care).65 The results herein highlight a critical need for intervention to reduce their burdens from substance use and for policies to address presently underfunded systems of care and improve infrastructures linking behavioral and primary health care services.54,65 In addition, high rates of substance use and substance-related disorders among adolescents of multiple race/ethnicity provide a rationale for including them in research analysis and reporting findings as appropriate. Furthermore, while health care providers who regularly see adolescents for periodic checkups can have a critical role in screening for substance use and early intervention, substantial barriers to recommended practices exist, and research is needed to identify incentives and means to promote screening and timely intervention.66,67 Finally, many addiction treatment programs either exclude adolescents from treatment (eg, program policies) or integrate adolescents into programs serving adults. Even within adolescent-specific programs, key elements for effective treatment are often inadequately addressed, and a lack of cultural competence is identified as a major gap, as insensitivity to cultural differences can limit the ability to treat and retain minority adolescents.14,68-70 Taken together, these findings call for efforts to identify and expand prevention measures that are culturally effective and address the quality and acceptability of treatment for adolescents with substance use problems.67,70
Correspondence: Li-Tzy Wu, ScD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, PO Box 3419, Durham, NC 27710 (email@example.com).
Submitted for Publication: April 5, 2011; final revision received April 26, 2011; accepted May 11, 2011.
Author Contributions: Data analyses were performed by Drs Wu and Yang. Dr Wu had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Financial Disclosure: Dr Woody is a member of the Researched Abuse Diversion and Addiction-Related Surveillance (RADARS) system postmarketing study scientific advisory group, whose job is to assess abuse of prescription medications. Denver Health administers RADARS, and pharmaceutical companies support its work.
Funding/Support: This article was made possible by grants R33DA027503, R01DA019623, and R01DA019901 (Dr Wu), K05DA017009 and U10DA013043 (Dr Woody), and HHSN271200522071C (Dr Blazer) from the US National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive provided the public use data files for the NSDUH, which was sponsored by the Office of Applied Studies of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Role of the Sponsors: The National Institutes of Health had no role in the design or conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
Disclaimer: The contents herein are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Additional Contributions: Amanda McMillan, MA, provided proofread and formatted the manuscript.
Toumbourou JW, Stockwell T, Neighbors C, Marlatt GA, Sturge J, Rehm J. Interventions to reduce harm associated with adolescent substance use. Lancet
. 2007;369(9570):1391-140117448826PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Brick J. Handbook of the Medical Consequences of Alcohol and Drug Abuse. New York, NY: Haworth Press; 2004
Schuckit MA. Comorbidity between substance use disorders and psychiatric conditions. Addiction
. 2006;101:(suppl 1)
National Institute on Drug Abuse. Drugs, Brains, and Behavior: The Science of Addiction. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2007. NIH publication 07-5605. http://www.drugabuse.gov/ScienceofAddiction/sciofaddiction.pdf. Accessed January 13, 2011
Brook JS, Richter L, Rubenstone E. Consequences of adolescent drug use on psychiatric disorders in early adulthood. Ann Med
. 2000;32(6):401-40711028688PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Clark DB, Martin CS, Cornelius JR. Adolescent-onset substance use disorders predict young adult mortality. J Adolesc Health
. 2008;42(6):637-63918486875PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Swahn MH, Bossarte RM, Sullivent EE III. Age of alcohol use initiation, suicidal behavior, and peer and dating violence victimization and perpetration among high-risk, seventh-grade adolescents. Pediatrics
. 2008;121(2):297-30518245421PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kandel DB, Johnson JG, Bird HR, Weissman MM, Goodman SH, Lahey BB, Regier DA, Schwab-Stone ME. Psychiatric comorbidity among adolescents with substance use disorders: findings from the MECA Study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
. 1999;38(6):693-69910361787PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Gfroerer JC, Epstein JF. Marijuana initiates and their impact on future drug abuse treatment need. Drug Alcohol Depend
. 1999;54(3):229-23710372796PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results From the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Mental Health Findings. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies; 2010. NSDUH series H-39. HHS publication SMA 10-4609
Day JC. Population Projections of the United States by Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 1995 to 2050, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1996:25-1130
Mays VM, Ponce NA, Washington DL, Cochran SD. Classification of race and ethnicity: implications for public health. Annu Rev Public Health
. 2003;24:83-11012668755PubMedGoogle Scholar
Szapocznik J, Prado G, Burlew AK, Williams RA, Santisteban DA. Drug abuse in African American and Hispanic adolescents: culture, development, and behavior. Annu Rev Clin Psychol
. 2007;3:77-10517716049PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Galea S, Rudenstine S. Challenges in understanding disparities in drug use and its consequences. J Urban Health
. 2005;82(2):(suppl 3)
Warner LA, Valdez A, Vega WA, de la Rosa M, Turner RJ, Canino G. Hispanic drug abuse in an evolving cultural context: an agenda for research. Drug Alcohol Depend
. 2006;84:(suppl 1)
Wallace JM Jr, Bachman JG, O’Malley PM, Johnston LD, Schulenberg JE, Cooper SM. Tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use: racial and ethnic differences among U.S. high school seniors, 1976-2000. Public Health Rep
. 2002;117:(suppl 1)
Beauvais F, Oetting ER. Variances in the etiology of drug use among ethnic groups of adolescents. Public Health Rep
. 2002;117:(suppl 1)
Kandel D, Chen K, Warner LA, Kessler RC, Grant B. Prevalence and demographic correlates of symptoms of last year dependence on alcohol, nicotine, marijuana and cocaine in the U.S. population. Drug Alcohol Depend
. 1997;44(1):11-299031816PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Summary of Findings From the 2000 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, Dept of Health and Human Services; 2001. NHSDA series H-13. Publication SMA 01-3549
Wu LT, Pilowsky DJ, Patkar AA. Non-prescribed use of pain relievers among adolescents in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend
. 2008;94(1-3):1-1118054444PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Wu LT, Ringwalt CL, Mannelli P, Patkar AA. Prescription pain reliever abuse and dependence among adolescents: a nationally representative study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
. 2008;47(9):1020-102918664996PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman J, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the Future: National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings, 2010. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2011
Wilson JM, Donnermeyer JF. Urbanity, rurality, and adolescent substance use. Crim Justice Rev
. 2006;31(4):337-356Google ScholarCrossref
Duncan SC, Duncan TE, Strycker LA. A multilevel analysis of neighborhood context and youth alcohol and drug problems. Prev Sci
. 2002;3(2):125-13312088137PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Smith PM, Glazier RH, Sibley LM. The predictors of self-rated health and the relationship between self-rated health and health service needs are similar across socioeconomic groups in Canada. J Clin Epidemiol
. 2010;63(4):412-42119926448PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Parker T. Factors associated with American Indian teens' self-rated health. Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res
. 2004;11(3):1-1915536586PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results From the 2008 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2009. NSDUH series H-36. DHHS publication SMA 09-4434
Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results From the 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2007. NSDUH series H-32. DHHS publication SMA 07-4293
Morton KB, Chromy JR, Hunter SR, Martin PC. 2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Sample Design Report. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International; 2006. Prepared for the 2005 Methodological Resource Book. Prepared for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies, under contract 283-2004-00022
Epstein JF. Substance Dependence, Abuse, and Treatment: Findings From the 2000 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2002. Analytic series A-16. DHHS publication SMA 02-3642
Research Triangle Institute. SUDAAN User's Manual, Release 9.0. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 2006
Hasin DS, Hatzenbueler M, Smith S, Grant BF. Co-occurring DSM-IV
drug abuse in DSM-IV
drug dependence: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Drug Alcohol Depend
. 2005;80(1):117-12316157234PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Bachman JG, Wallace JM Jr, O’Malley PM, Johnston LD, Kurth CL, Neighbors HW. Racial/ethnic differences in smoking, drinking, and illicit drug use among American high school seniors, 1976-89. Am J Public Health
. 1991;81(3):372-3771994746PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Manchikanti L. National drug control policy and prescription drug abuse: facts and fallacies. Pain Physician
. 2007;10(3):399-42417525776PubMedGoogle Scholar
Oetting ER, Donnermeyer JF, Deffenbacher JL. Primary socialization theory: the influence of the community on drug use and deviance, III. Subst Use Misuse
. 1998;33(8):1629-16659680086PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Jessor R. New perspectives on adolescent risk behavior. In: Jessor R, ed. New Perspectives on Adolescent Risk Behavior. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1998:1-10
Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Miller JY. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychol Bull
. 1992;112(1):64-1051529040PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University. National Survey of American Attitudes on Substance Abuse, XV: Teens and Parents. New York, NY: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University. August 2010. Conducted by Knowledge Networks QEV Analytics, Ltd. http://www.casacolumbia.org/upload/2010/20100819teensurvey.pdf. Accessed January 15, 2010
Delva J, Wallace JM Jr, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Johnston LD, Schulenberg JE. The epidemiology of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine use among Mexican American, Puerto Rican, Cuban American, and other Latin American eighth-grade students in the United States: 1991-2002. Am J Public Health
. 2005;95(4):696-70215798132PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Yu M, Stiffman AR. Culture and environment as predictors of alcohol abuse/dependence symptoms in American Indian youths. Addict Behav
. 2007;32(10):2253-225917289281PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Walters KL, Simoni JM, Evans-Campbell T. Substance use among American Indians and Alaska natives: incorporating culture in an“indigenist” stress-coping paradigm. Public Health Rep
. 2002;117:(suppl 1)
Williams DR, Jackson JS. Race/ethnicity and the 2000 census: recommendations for African American and other black populations in the United States. Am J Public Health
. 2000;90(11):1728-173011076240PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Miller KA, Beauvais F, Burnside M, Jumper-Thurman P. A comparison of American Indian and non-Indian fourth to sixth graders' rates of drug use. J Ethn Subst Abuse
. 2008;7(3):258-26719042809PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Whitbeck LB, Yu M, Johnson KD, Hoyt DR, Walls ML. Diagnostic prevalence rates from early to mid-adolescence among indigenous adolescents: first results from a longitudinal study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
. 2008;47(8):890-90018596558PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Novins DK, Fickenscher A, Manson SM. American Indian adolescents in substance abuse treatment: diagnostic status. J Subst Abuse Treat
. 2006;30(4):275-28416716841PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior. Federally recognized Indian tribes. Fed Regist. 2002;67(134):46327-46333. http://www.artnatam.com/tribes.html. Accessed January 7, 2011
Perl HI, Thomas LR, eds
. Methamphetamine and Other Drugs (MOD) in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities (CTN-0033): Preliminary Report on the Process of MOD Research Partnerships Between Community and Institutionally Based Researchers
. http://ctndisseminationlibrary.org/PDF/440.pdf. Accessed January 4, 2011
Shapiro GK, Buckley-Hunter L. What every adolescent needs to know: cannabis can cause psychosis. J Psychosom Res
. 2010;69(6):533-53921109040PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Office of National Drug Control Policy. Teens and Prescription Drugs: An Analysis of Recent Trends on the Emerging Drug Threat. Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy, Executive Office of the President; 2007
Schepis TS, Krishnan-Sarin S. Sources of prescriptions for misuse by adolescents: differences in sex, ethnicity, and severity of misuse in a population-based study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
. 2009;48(8):828-83619564803PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Paulozzi LJ, Budnitz DS, Xi Y. Increasing deaths from opioid analgesics in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf
. 2006;15(9):618-62716862602PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Veilleux JC, Colvin PJ, Anderson J, York C, Heinz AJ. A review of opioid dependence treatment: pharmacological and psychosocial interventions to treat opioid addiction. Clin Psychol Rev
. 2010;30(2):155-16619926374PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Wong MM, Klingle RS, Price RK. Alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use among Asian American and Pacific Islander adolescents in California and Hawaii. Addict Behav
. 2004;29(1):127-14114667425PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Stillwell R, Hoffman L. Public School Graduates and Dropouts From the Common Core of Data: School Year 2005-2006. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics; 2009
Chromy JR, Feder M, Gfroerer J, Hirsch E, Kennet J, Morton KB, Piper L, Riggsbee BH, Snodgrass JA, Virag TG, Yu F. Reliability of Key Measures in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2009. Methodology series M-8DHHS. Publication SMA 09-4425
Harrison LD, Martin SS, Enev T, Harrington D. Comparing Drug Testing and Self-report of Drug Use Among Youths and Young Adults in the General Population. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2007. Methodology series M-7. DHHS publication SMA 07-4249
Goodkind JR, Ross-Toledo K, John S, Hall JL, Ross L, Freeland L, Coletta E, Becenti-Fundark T, Poola C, Begay-Roanhorse R, Lee C. Promoting healing and restoring trust: policy recommendations for improving behavioral health care for American Indian/Alaska Native adolescents. Am J Community Psychol
. 2010;46(3-4):386-39420857331PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Winters KC, Kaminer Y. Screening and assessing adolescent substance use disorders in clinical populations. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
. 2008;47(7):740-74418574399PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Knudsen HK. Adolescent-only substance abuse treatment: availability and adoption of components of quality. J Subst Abuse Treat
. 2009;36(2):195-20419000942PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Mark TL, Song X, Vandivort R, Duffy S, Butler J, Coffey R, Schabert VF. Characterizing substance abuse programs that treat adolescents. J Subst Abuse Treat
. 2006;31(1):59-6516814011PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Brannigan R, Schackman BR, Falco M, Millman RB. The quality of highly regarded adolescent substance abuse treatment programs: results of an in-depth national survey. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
. 2004;158(9):904-90915351757PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref