Assessment of Pedophilia Using Hemodynamic Brain Response to Sexual Stimuli | Neurology | JAMA Psychiatry | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.226.234.102. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Wetzels P. Prävalenz und familiäre Hintergründe sexuellen Kindesmissbrauchs in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Befragung.  Sexuologie. 1997;4(2):89-107Google Scholar
2.
Blanchard R, Klassen P, Dickey R, Kuban ME, Blak T. Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders.  Psychol Assess. 2001;13(1):118-12611281033PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
American Psychiatric Association.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed, text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000
4.
Blanchard R, Barbaree HE, Bogaert AF, Dickey R, Klassen P, Kuban ME, Zucker KJ. Fraternal birth order and sexual orientation in pedophiles.  Arch Sex Behav. 2000;29(5):463-47810983250PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Smallbone SW, McCabe BA. Childhood attachment, childhood sexual abuse, and onset of masturbation among adult sexual offenders.  Sex Abuse. 2003;15(1):1-912616925PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Blanchard R, Kuban ME, Klassen P, Dickey R, Christensen BK, Cantor JM, Blak T. Self-reported head injuries before and after age 13 in pedophilic and nonpedophilic men referred for clinical assessment.  Arch Sex Behav. 2003;32(6):573-58114574100PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Cantor JM, Blanchard R, Christensen BK, Dickey R, Klassen PE, Beckstead AL, Blak T, Kuban ME. Intelligence, memory, and handedness in pedophilia.  Neuropsychology. 2004;18(1):3-1414744183PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Schiffer B, Vonlaufen C. Executive dysfunctions in pedophilic and nonpedophilic child molesters.  J Sex Med. 2011;8(7):1975-198421210954PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Jespersen AF, Lalumière ML, Seto MC. Sexual abuse history among adult sex offenders and non-sex offenders: a meta-analysis.  Child Abuse Negl. 2009;33(3):179-19219327831PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Schiltz K, Witzel J, Northoff G, Zierhut K, Gubka U, Fellmann H, Kaufmann J, Tempelmann C, Wiebking C, Bogerts B. Brain pathology in pedophilic offenders: evidence of volume reduction in the right amygdala and related diencephalic structures.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(6):737-74617548755PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Schiffer B, Peschel T, Paul T, Gizewski E, Forsting M, Leygraf N, Schedlowski M, Krueger TH. Structural brain abnormalities in the frontostriatal system and cerebellum in pedophilia.  J Psychiatr Res. 2007;41(9):753-76216876824PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Cantor JM, Kabani N, Christensen BK, Zipursky RB, Barbaree HE, Dickey R, Klassen PE, Mikulis DJ, Kuban ME, Blak T, Richards BA, Hanratty MK, Blanchard R. Cerebral white matter deficiencies in pedophilic men.  J Psychiatr Res. 2008;42(3):167-18318039544PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Sartorius A, Ruf M, Kief C, Demirakca T, Bailer J, Ende G, Henn FA, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Dressing H. Abnormal amygdala activation profile in pedophilia.  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008;258(5):271-27718504635PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Walter M, Witzel J, Wiebking C, Gubka U, Rotte M, Schiltz K, Bermpohl F, Tempelmann C, Bogerts B, Heinze HJ, Northoff G. Pedophilia is linked to reduced activation in hypothalamus and lateral prefrontal cortex during visual erotic stimulation.  Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62(6):698-70117400196PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Schiffer B, Krueger T, Paul T, de Greiff A, Forsting M, Leygraf N, Schedlowski M, Gizewski E. Brain response to visual sexual stimuli in homosexual pedophiles.  J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2008;33(1):23-3318197269PubMedGoogle Scholar
16.
Schiffer B, Paul T, Gizewski E, Forsting M, Leygraf N, Schedlowski M, Kruger TH. Functional brain correlates of heterosexual paedophilia.  Neuroimage. 2008;41(1):80-9118358744PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Ponseti J, Granert O, Jansen O, Wolff S, Mehdorn H, Bosinski H, Siebner H. Assessment of sexual orientation using the hemodynamic brain response to visual sexual stimuli.  J Sex Med. 2009;6(6):1628-163419473471PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Duchesne S, Caroli A, Geroldi C, Barillot C, Frisoni GB, Collins DL. MRI-based automated computer classification of probable AD versus normal controls.  IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008;27(4):509-52018390347PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Klöppel S, Stonnington CM, Chu C, Draganski B, Scahill RI, Rohrer JD, Fox NC, Jack CR Jr, Ashburner J, Frackowiak RS. Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer's disease.  Brain. 2008;131(pt 3):681-68918202106PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Soriano-Mas C, Pujol J, Alonso P, Cardoner N, Menchón JM, Harrison BJ, Deus J, Vallejo J, Gaser C. Identifying patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder using whole-brain anatomy.  Neuroimage. 2007;35(3):1028-103717321758PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Koutsouleris N, Meisenzahl EM, Davatzikos C, Bottlender R, Frodl T, Scheuerecker J, Schmitt G, Zetzsche T, Decker P, Reiser M, Möller HJ, Gaser C. Use of neuroanatomical pattern classification to identify subjects in at-risk mental states of psychosis and predict disease transition.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(7):700-71219581561PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Fu CH, Mourao-Miranda J, Costafreda SG, Khanna A, Marquand AF, Williams SC, Brammer MJ. Pattern classification of sad facial processing: toward the development of neurobiological markers in depression.  Biol Psychiatry. 2008;63(7):656-66217949689PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE. The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies.  J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(6):1154-116316392988PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Freund K, Watson R. Assessment of the Sensitivity and Specificity of a Phallometric Test: an update of phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia.  Psychol Assess. 1991;3(2):254-260Google ScholarCrossref
25.
Howes R. A survey of plethysmographic assessment in North America.  Sex Abuse. 1995;7(1):9-24Google Scholar
26.
Kuban M, Barbaree HE, Blanchard R. A comparison of volume and circumference phallometry: response magnitude and method agreement.  Arch Sex Behav. 1999;28(4):345-35910553495PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Kolla NJ, Klassen PE, Kuban ME, Blak T, Blanchard R. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sildenafil in phallometric testing.  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2010;38(4):502-51121156909PubMedGoogle Scholar
28.
Dasarathy BV. Nearest Neighbor Norms: NN Pattern Classification Techniques. Vol 20. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1991
29.
Beier KM, Neutze J, Mundt IA, Ahlers CJ, Goecker D, Konrad A, Schaefer GA. Encouraging self-identified pedophiles and hebephiles to seek professional help: first results of the Prevention Project Dunkelfeld (PPD).  Child Abuse Negl. 2009;33(8):545-54919765825PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Neutze J, Seto MC, Schaefer GA, Mundt IA, Beier KM. Predictors of child pornography offenses and child sexual abuse in a community sample of pedophiles and hebephiles.  Sex Abuse. 2011;23(2):212-24220935341PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Kirk KM, Bailey JM, Dunne MP, Martin NG. Measurement models for sexual orientation in a community twin sample.  Behav Genet. 2000;30(4):345-35611206089PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
von Aster M, Neubauer A, Horn R. Wechsler Intelligenztest für Erwachsene WIE. Deutschsprachige Bearbeitung und Adaptation des WAIS-III von David Wechsler. Frankfurt, Germany: Pearson Assessment; 2006
33.
Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Technical Manual and Affective Ratings. Gainesville: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida; 1997
34.
Ponseti J, Bosinski HA, Wolff S, Peller M, Jansen O, Mehdorn HM, Büchel C, Siebner HR. A functional endophenotype for sexual orientation in humans.  Neuroimage. 2006;33(3):825-83316979350PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Bradley MM, Greenwald A, Hamm A. Affective picture processing. In: Birbaumer N,Öhman A, eds. The Structure of Emotion. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe; 1993:48-65
36.
Friston KJ, Holmes A, Worsley KJ, Poline J, Frith C, Frackowiak RSJ. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach.  Hum Brain Mapp. 1995;2(4):189-210Google ScholarCrossref
37.
Stoleru S, Mouras H. Brain functional imaging studies of sexual desire and arousal in human males. In: Janssen E, ed. The Psychophysiology of Sex. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2007:3-34
38.
Freund K, Blanchard R. Phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia.  J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989;57(1):100-1052925958PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Barbaree HE, Baxter DJ, Marshall WL. Brief research report: the reliability of the rape index in a sample of rapists and nonrapists.  Violence Vict. 1989;4(4):299-3062487141PubMedGoogle Scholar
Original Article
Feb 2012

Assessment of Pedophilia Using Hemodynamic Brain Response to Sexual Stimuli

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Sections of Sexual Medicine (Drs Ponseti and Bosinski) and Neuroradiology (Dr Jansen and Mr Wolff) and Departments of Neurology (Mr Granert and Drs Deuschl and Siebner) and Neurosurgery (Dr Mehdorn), Medical School, Christian Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, and Institute of Sexology and Sexual Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Freie University and Humboldt University, Berlin (Dr Beier and Ms Neutze), Germany; and Danish Research Center for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Dr Siebner).

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(2):187-194. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.130
Abstract

Context Accurately assessing sexual preference is important in the treatment of child sex offenders. Phallometry is the standard method to identify sexual preference; however, this measure has been criticized for its intrusiveness and limited reliability.

Objective To evaluate whether spatial response pattern to sexual stimuli as revealed by a change in the blood oxygen level–dependent signal facilitates the identification of pedophiles.

Design During functional magnetic resonance imaging, pedophilic and nonpedophilic participants were briefly exposed to same- and opposite-sex images of nude children and adults. We calculated differences in blood oxygen level–dependent signals to child and adult sexual stimuli for each participant. The corresponding contrast images were entered into a group analysis to calculate whole-brain difference maps between groups. We calculated an expression value that corresponded to the group result for each participant. These expression values were submitted to 2 different classification algorithms: Fisher linear discriminant analysis and κ -nearest neighbor analysis. This classification procedure was cross-validated using the leave-one-out method.

Setting Section of Sexual Medicine, Medical School, Christian Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Participants We recruited 24 participants with pedophilia who were sexually attracted to either prepubescent girls (n = 11) or prepubescent boys (n = 13) and 32 healthy male controls who were sexually attracted to either adult women (n = 18) or adult men (n = 14).

Main Outcome Measures Sensitivity and specificity scores of the 2 classification algorithms.

Results The highest classification accuracy was achieved by Fisher linear discriminant analysis, which showed a mean accuracy of 95% (100% specificity, 88% sensitivity).

Conclusions Functional brain response patterns to sexual stimuli contain sufficient information to identify pedophiles with high accuracy. The automatic classification of these patterns is a promising objective tool to clinically diagnose pedophilia.

×