Importance
Impaired mitochondrial function impacts many biological processes that depend heavily on energy and metabolism and can lead to a wide range of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Although evidence that mitochondrial dysfunction is a biological subtype of ASD has grown in recent years, no study, to our knowledge, has demonstrated evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction in brain tissue in vivo in a large, well-defined sample of individuals with ASD.
Objectives
To assess brain lactate in individuals with ASD and typically developing controls using high-resolution, multiplanar spectroscopic imaging; to map the distribution of lactate in the brains of individuals with ASD; and to assess correlations of elevated brain lactate with age, autism subtype, and intellectual ability.
Design, Setting, and Participants
Case-control study at Columbia University Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute involving 75 children and adults with ASD and 96 age- and sex-matched, typically developing controls.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Lactate doublets (present or absent) on brain magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.
Results
Lactate doublets were present at a significantly higher rate in participants with ASD (13%) than controls (1%) (P = .001). In the ASD group, the presence of lactate doublets correlated significantly with age (P = .004) and was detected more often in adults (20%) than in children (6%), though it did not correlate with sex, ASD subtype, intellectual ability, or the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule total score or subscores. In those with ASD, lactate was detected most frequently within the cingulate gyrus but it was also present in the subcortical gray matter nuclei, corpus callosum, superior temporal gyrus, and pre- and postcentral gyri.
Conclusions and Relevance
In vivo brain findings provide evidence for a possible neurobiological subtype of mitochondrial dysfunction in ASD.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by disturbances in social interaction, communication, and behavioral flexibility.1 The diagnosis of ASD is at present based solely on behavioral phenotyping and its underlying etiology can be identified in only a minority of cases. An estimated 10% of ASD cases are associated with a known genetic syndrome (syndromic ASD) and the remainder, classified as primary or idiopathic ASD, have no clearly identifiable cause.2 A variety of genetic and environmental factors likely contribute to the notorious etiologic heterogeneity of this disorder.2
Mitochondrial disease is an established cause of syndromic autism, generally believed until now to represent less than 1% of all cases of ASD.2-4 However, recent studies examining biomarkers of mitochondrial dysfunction obtained from peripheral or postmortem samples have detected impaired mitochondrial function in a much higher percentage of ASD cases.5-9 It is unclear whether these cases represent primary mitochondrial dysfunction or mitochondrial dysfunction secondary to other processes, such as increased oxidative stress.3,4 Moreover, peripheral markers do not necessarily represent in vivo disturbances in the brain. Thus, it remains unknown whether mitochondrial dysfunction is present in the brains of individuals with ASD and may play a role in its core cognitive and behavioral symptoms.
Three prior studies have used in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure brain lactate, a marker of mitochondrial dysfunction in children with ASD.10-12 Lactate peaks were not detected at significantly higher rates in participants with ASD compared with controls. However, those studies had various limitations including small sample sizes10; limited sampling of brain regions10-12; averaging and potential dilution of lactate signal over large, heterogeneous regions of interest10-12; reduced sensitivity due to low magnet field strength (1.5 T)10-12; and data acquisition from a single volume coil rather than from multiple, more sensitive surface coils.10-12
We acquired proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy data on a 3-T scanner to assess in vivo evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction directly in the brains of a large sample of children and adults with ASD.
Seventy-five individuals with ASD (simplex cases), aged 5 to 60 years, participated in this case-control study. They were recruited from child psychiatry clinics, schools, support groups, community events, and databases of research participants for other studies of ASD at our institution. The institutional review board of the New York State Psychiatric Institute approved the study and written informed consent was obtained from participants prior to their participation. For adult participants with ASD, an independent assessment of capacity to consent was conducted by a designated clinical monitor (a licensed psychologist or psychiatrist unaffiliated with the research study). If a participant was deemed by the monitor to lack capacity to consent, a participant-chosen surrogate then completed the consent process.
Each participant underwent a diagnostic evaluation by a psychiatrist, neurologist, or psychologist with expertise in the diagnosis of ASD. Diagnosis was made according to DSM-IV-TR criteria for autistic disorder (45%), Asperger disorder (32%), or pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (23%). Assessments generally included the Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised in children and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule in children and adults.13,14 Exclusion criteria included identifiable genetic or metabolic abnormalities (eg, Fragile X, tuberous sclerosis complex, or known mitochondrial disease), a history of neurological injury (eg, cerebral ischemia, inflammation, infection, malignancy, status epilepticus, or perinatal or postnatal trauma), seizure activity during the 6 months prior to the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, medical contraindications to MRI scanning (including claustrophobia), or inability to cooperate with study procedures. A detailed list of current medications was recorded for every participant, with particular attention to those associated with mitochondrial toxicity (available on request).15,16 Dietary restrictions, the use of dietary supplements, and sleep habits were not routinely assessed.
Ninety-six typically developing controls matched by age and sex participated in the study. Controls were recruited from community-based telemarketing lists of households in the same geographic regions as the ASD cohort. A detailed clinical interview was performed that included the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for children or the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders for adults.17,18 Individuals with a current or previous psychiatric or neurological disorder were excluded. Control participants were also screened using the Social Communication Questionnaire and Social Responsiveness Scale.19 All control participants scored below threshold for ASD on these instruments (Social Responsiveness Scale score cutoff, 70 for males and 65 for females; Social Communication Questionnaire score cutoff, 15 for both males and females). None of the control participants were taking prescription or over-the-counter medications; however, the use of dietary supplements was not assessed.
Each participant (or guardian) was asked to classify the participant’s race according to options defined by the investigator. Race was deemed to be relevant to this study because of differences in mitochondrial traits across races.
Participants were evaluated using the 4-subtest format of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence.20 Intelligence testing was generally performed on the same day as the MRI scan and always occurred within 1 month of the MRI scan.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
All magnetic resonance data were acquired on a 3-T whole-body scanner (GE Signa) equipped with an 8-channel surface coil for parallel imaging. Head positioning was standardized using canthomeatal landmarks. No sedation was used at any time during the study. Participants’ faces were monitored during the scan using a video camera. A research assistant was present throughout the scan and confirmed the participant was awake and resting quietly at the start and completion of each sequence. If the participant showed signs of anxiety or hyperventilation, the scan was immediately terminated and the data were not included in the study.
These were acquired using a 3-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled sequence with repetition time (TR) = 24 milliseconds, echo time (TE) = 5 milliseconds, flip angle = 11°, number of excitations (NEX) = 1, acquisition matrix in the axial plane = 256 × 192, number of contiguous sagittal slices = approximately 182 (depending on brain dimensions) with 1-mm thickness without skip, field of view (FOV) in axial plane = 25 × 25 cm2, reconstructed image matrix = 256 × 256 × 182, and nominal voxel dimensions = 0.98 mm × 0.98 mm × 1 mm.
Multiplanar Spectroscopic Imaging
Proton multiplanar spectroscopic imaging (MPSI) quantifies endogenous brain chemistry and examines regional cellular metabolism and function. Using MPSI, we obtained spectroscopic measures of metabolites in contiguous 1-cm3 voxels throughout the brain. This noninvasive technique allows for the detection of lactate, which is generally considered pathological when detectable in cerebral tissue and which serves as a biomarker of cerebral mitochondrial dysfunction. Localizer images were acquired in 6 axial oblique slices (parallel to the anterior commissure–posterior commissure line, 1 slice positioned below the anterior commissure–posterior commissure line) with TR = 300 milliseconds, TE = 2.1 milliseconds, FOV = 24 cm, slice thickness = 10.0 mm, spacing = 2.0 mm, NEX = 1, spectral width = 31.25 MHz, and matrix = 256 × 128, zero-padded to 256 × 256. The spectral data were acquired using the MPSI sequence in 6 axial oblique slices as prescribed by the localizer images using optimized parameters21: TE = 144 milliseconds, TR = 2800 milliseconds, FOV = 24 × 24 cm2, slice thickness = 10.0 mm, spacing = 2.0, phase encodings = 24 × 24, NEX = 1, spectral width = 2000 Hz, and number of points = 512, with outer-volume lipid suppression and water suppression. Scan time, including shimming, was 30 minutes.
The entire raw data set acquired by the 8-channel coil was separated into subsets for individual coils. The k-space data for each individual coil were multiplied by a Hamming window function for spatial filtering, prior to spatial transform to suppress signal contamination stemming from the effect of the point-spread function. We applied a 2-dimensional fast Fourier transform to the data to transform it into image space on a slicewise basis. Water residues were removed using a high-pass filter. Time domain echoes were zero-filled to 2048 points, followed by application of a spectral fast Fourier transform to transform the time-domain echoes into the spectral domain. For spectral registration, we set the frequency of the singlet of N-acetylaspartate (NAA) (the CH3 group) to 2.01 ppm. We then performed zero-order and first-order phase correction so that the 3 prominent singlets of NAA, creatine, and choline were all in absorption (real) mode.
MPSI Data Quality and Criteria for Exclusion
Participant MPSI data were deemed unusable if they met any of the following criteria:
Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of NAA was less than 10 in the sensitive region of any single coil.
Linewidth was broad, manifesting as overlapping creatine and choline signals (the value at which the peaks overlap was greater than 75% of the height of the lower peak) in more than 33% of the voxels in the sensitive region of the individual coil.
Motion artifact was substantial, manifesting as overall low SNR, broad linewidth, the presence of a large water residue, and lipid contamination.
Using these criteria, 13 patient scans and 4 control scans were excluded from the study.
Rationale for Screening the Spectra of the Component Coils
We screened the spectra of individual coil components instead of the spectra combined across all coil elements for the following reasons: (1) The combination of the spectra of the coil array requires phase alignment across coils, a procedure that requires a reference signal. Although NAA is commonly used as a reference, we found that the SNRs of NAA varied widely across coils. The errors of the phases of NAA in low-sensitivity regions in some coils could be large because of the low SNRs of NAA, likely introducing phase errors in the combined spectra that could adversely affect our ability to detect lactate peaks, which are phase sensitive. When combining spectra in absolute mode, phase alignment is not necessary; on the other hand, the valuable phase information of lactate, one of the important criteria for the detection of lactate, is lost. (2) Different coils may fluctuate in their degree of lipid contamination because of their differing positions relative to the skull and the outer volume suppression bands. Therefore, screening the spectra of individual coil components may allow us to detect lactate in 1 coil that has no lipid contamination and avoid obscuring it by combining it with the spectrum from another coil that contains severe lipid contamination (eFigures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 in Supplement).
Criteria for Defining Lactate Doublets
Each voxel (1-cm3 volume, 900-1200 per brain) was visually inspected for the presence of a lactate doublet by 2 trained personnel and then confirmed by a senior spectroscopy expert (all blind to participant characteristics). Lactate doublets were identified using operational criteria that emphasize the fundamental properties of the lactate doublet (Figure 1):
The central frequency of the doublet must have been in the range of 1.31 to 1.35 ppm.
The doublet must have been inverted in phase-corrected real mode.
The separation of the doublet must have been 7 Hz.
In addition, putative lactate doublets must also have met the following criteria:
The amplitude of the lactate doublet was more than twice that of surrounding noise. The noise level was estimated peak to peak by visual inspection (but not through calculation of the standard deviation).
Adjacent voxels either within or across slices could not contain lipid contamination.
The lactate doublet must have been present in more than 1 channel, unless a clear and compelling explanation could account for its absence (eg, weak signal due to the distance of the voxel from a particular coil or the presence of lipid contamination in a particular coil that could impair visibility of the lactate peak).
The amplitude of the NAA peak must have been 10-fold higher than the surrounding noise; this did not apply to the ventricle region where no NAA signal was visible.
Creatine and choline peaks were clearly separated.
All statistical procedures were performed in SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc). A general linear model (PROC GLM) and frequency table (PROC FREQ) were used to compare the control and autism groups on study measures while covarying for age, sex, and full-scale IQ of the participants. All P values were 2-sided.
Lactate doublets were present at a significantly higher rate in participants with ASD (13%) than in typically developing controls (1%) (P = .001), providing in vivo evidence for the presence of mitochondrial dysfunction in the brains of individuals with ASD (Table 1). Elevated lactate correlated significantly with age (P = .004) and was detected more often in adults (20%) than in children (6%). Its presence did not correlate, however, with sex, ASD subtype, intellectual ability, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule total score or subscores, or presence of comorbid neurological or psychiatric diagnoses (Table 2 and data available on request).
Our methods for data acquisition and analysis allowed us to map the anatomical location of lactate (Figure 2). In the ASD group, the location varied across individuals, but it seemed to aggregate preferentially within the cingulate gyrus. Lactate was also detected in subcortical gray matter nuclei, corpus callosum, superior temporal gyrus, pre- and postcentral gyri, and cerebrospinal fluid.
This is the first study, to our knowledge, to demonstrate evidence for mitochondrial dysfunction in vivo in the brains of individuals with ASD. Our study yielded an overall prevalence estimate of 13% for ASD with concomitant mitochondrial dysfunction, but it was considerably higher (20%) for adults with ASD. These estimates are likely to be conservative for several reasons. First, magnetic resonance spectroscopy has limited sensitivity to detect lactate (brain lactate may not be detected in vivo even in individuals with definitive mitochondrial disease with cerebral involvement).22 Second, this study was biased toward inclusion of higher-functioning individuals (eg, those who could comply with the requirements of a lengthy imaging study without sedation and those without identifiable genetic or metabolic abnormalities, a history of neurological injury, or uncontrolled seizures). If mitochondrial dysfunction is associated with greater symptom severity, then brain lactate may be underrepresented in our sample. Third, various technical limitations increased the false-negative rate in our study. These technical limitations included the use of a pulse sequence that suppressed lipid incompletely, which may have obscured the lactate doublet in some participants, particularly in the cortex where lipid contamination from nearby scalp tissue is greatest (see eAppendix in Supplement for limitations of our methods). Finally, peripheral markers of mitochondrial dysfunction were not assessed in this study. Although peripheral markers often do not correlate with elevated brain lactate on magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging, their inclusion in future studies would help to better characterize the subgroup of individuals with ASD and mitochondrial dysfunction. This assessment is particularly important given that studies of peripheral markers of mitochondrial dysfunction in ASD have detected much higher rates of mitochondrial dysfunction than in our study.3,5-9
Although elevated lactate is widely accepted as a biomarker of mitochondrial dysfunction, lactate elevation can arise from a variety of sources, including acute physiological changes (such as exercise, anxiety, hyperventilation, or trauma),23,24 numerous disease states,25 and medication use.15,16 Our strict exclusion criteria and careful scanning procedures made such explanations less likely. Moreover, the lactate-positive and lactate-negative ASD groups did not differ significantly in their use of psychoactive medications. Only 1 individual in the lactate-positive ASD group was taking psychoactive medication (a combination of stimulants) (data available on request). None of the lactate-positive individuals were taking neuroleptics or medications with established in vivo mitochondrial toxicity.15,16
A key finding from this study is the higher rate of elevated brain lactate in adults with ASD. This finding has at least 2 possible explanations. First, ascertainment bias could have contributed to these age-specific findings. Some children with ASD no longer meet diagnostic criteria as adults,26 and mitochondrial dysfunction may be more frequent in those who meet diagnostic criteria into adulthood. Therefore, recruitment of clinically identified adults could preferentially recruit those who have mitochondrial dysfunction. Second, the age-specific findings could represent a worsening of mitochondrial function with aging.27
Regardless of its cause, our finding suggests that the inclusion of adults is important for understanding the complex role of mitochondrial dysfunction in ASD. Most prior studies of mitochondrial dysfunction in ASD, however, have excluded adults entirely.5-12 The bias toward studying children is understandable given that the symptoms of ASD appear in early childhood and mitochondrial dysfunction has been implicated in some cases of autistic regression during the first years of life. Mitochondrial dysfunction has been detected in adults with a range of other chronic neurological and psychiatric disorders.28,29 Determining the underlying cause of impaired mitochondrial function in ASD will require further investigation of children and adults and consideration of both primary causes of mitochondrial dysfunction (eg, mutations in mitochondrial or nuclear genes that play a role in mitochondrial metabolism) and secondary causes (eg, inflammation, neurodegeneration, and excess oxidative stress).
Our study not only demonstrated elevated brain lactate in ASD, but it also allowed us to map the distribution of lactate in the brain. The distribution varied from person to person, consistent with the well-documented, heterogeneous distribution of mitochondrial dysfunction that contributes to highly variable symptoms and severity in individuals with mitochondrial disorders. Nevertheless, lactate-positive voxels in our sample were detected most frequently in the cingulate gyrus, a structure that supports higher-order control of thought, emotion, and behavior, and one in which both anatomical and functional disturbances have been reported previously in ASD.30,31
Our use of more sensitive imaging technologies has allowed us to identify in vivo a biological subtype of ASD with mitochondrial dysfunction. Determining definitively whether impaired mitochondrial function in ASD is a primary abnormality or secondary to other causes, and whether its presence varies with age, clinical phenotype, natural history, or treatment response, will require further investigation. Our findings, however, suggest that individuals with ASD should undergo evaluation for mitochondrial dysfunction, as novel and promising treatments are under development for mitochondrial disorders.
Corresponding Author: Bradley S. Peterson, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Dr, Unit 74, New York, NY 10032 (bp2014@columbia.edu).
Submitted for Publication: August 28, 2013; final revision received December 2, 2013; accepted January 17, 2014.
Published Online: April 9, 2014. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.179.
Author Contributions: Dr Peterson had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: All authors.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: Goh, Dong, Peterson.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: Goh, Dong, Zhang, Peterson.
Obtained funding: Peterson.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Goh, Dong, Zhang, Peterson.
Study supervision: Goh, DiMauro, Peterson.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Goh is a scientific advisor to MitoMedical LLC, a nutritional supplement company. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: This study was made possible by funding from the National Institutes of Health (grant NIMH R01 MH089582), the Tom Klingenstein and Nancy Perlman Family Fund, and the Suzanne Crosby Murphy Endowment at Columbia University.
Role of the Sponsor: None of the sponsors had any role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Correction: This article was corrected online April 18, 2014 for an error in author affiliations.
1.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1994.
3.Rossignol
DA, Frye
RE. Mitochondrial dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mol Psychiatry. 2012;17(3):290-314.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 4.Palmieri
L, Persico
AM. Mitochondrial dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders: cause or effect?
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1797(6-7):1130-1137.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 5.Giulivi
C, Zhang
YF, Omanska-Klusek
A,
et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in autism.
JAMA. 2010;304(21):2389-2396.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 6.Oliveira
G, Diogo
L, Grazina
M,
et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders: a population-based study.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47(3):185-189.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 7.Correia
C, Coutinho
AM, Diogo
L,
et al. Brief report: high frequency of biochemical markers for mitochondrial dysfunction in autism. no association with the mitochondrial aspartate/glutamate carrier SLC25A12 gene.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2006;36(8):1137-1140.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 8.Tang
G, Gutierrez Rios
P, Kuo
SH,
et al. Mitochondrial abnormalities in temporal lobe of autistic brain.
Neurobiol Dis. 2013;54:349-361.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 9.Chauhan
A, Gu
F, Essa
MM,
et al. Brain region-specific deficit in mitochondrial electron transport chain complexes in children with autism.
J Neurochem. 2011;117(2):209-220.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 10.Chugani
DC, Sundram
BS, Behen
M, Lee
ML, Moore
GJ. Evidence of altered energy metabolism in autistic children.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1999;23(4):635-641.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 11.Friedman
SD, Shaw
DW, Artru
AA,
et al. Regional brain chemical alterations in young children with autism spectrum disorder.
Neurology. 2003;60(1):100-107.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 12.Corrigan
NM, Shaw
DW, Richards
TL,
et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and MRI reveal no evidence for brain mitochondrial dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorder.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2012;42(1):105-115.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 13.Lord
C, Rutter
M, Le Couteur
A. Autism Diagnostic Interview: a revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1994;24(5):659-685.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 14.Lord
C, Risi
S, Lambrecht
L,
et al. The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2000;30(3):205-223.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 15.Parikh
S, Saneto
R, Falk
MJ,
et al. A modern approach to the treatment of mitochondrial disease.
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2009;11(6):414-430.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 16.Modica-Napolitano
JS, Lagace
CJ, Brennan
WA, Aprille
JR. Differential effects of typical and atypical neuroleptics on mitochondrial function in vitro.
Arch Pharm Res. 2003;26(11):951-959.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 17.Kaufman
J, Birmaher
B, Brent
D,
et al. Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-age Children-Present and Lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36(7):980-988.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 18.Spitzer
RL, Williams
JBW, Gibbon
M, First
MB. The Structured Clinical Interview for
DSM-III-R (SCID): history, rationale, and description.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49(8):624-629.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 19.Norris
M, Lecavalier
L. Screening accuracy of level 2 autism spectrum disorder rating scales: a review of selected instruments.
Autism. 2010;14(4):263-284.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 20.Wechsler
D. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace & Co; 1999.
21.Duyn
JH, Gillen
J, Sobering
G, van Zijl
PC, Moonen
CT. Multisection proton MR spectroscopic imaging of the brain.
Radiology. 1993;188(1):277-282.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 22.Lin
DD, Crawford
TO, Barker
PB. Proton MR spectroscopy in the diagnostic evaluation of suspected mitochondrial disease.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(1):33-41.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 23.Dager
SR, Layton
ME, Strauss
W,
et al. Human brain metabolic response to caffeine and the effects of tolerance.
Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156(2):229-237.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 24.Dager
SR, Strauss
WL, Marro
KI, Richards
TL, Metzger
GD, Artru
AA. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy investigation of hyperventilation in subjects with panic disorder and comparison subjects.
Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152(5):666-672.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 25.Chow
SL, Rooney
ZJ, Cleary
MA, Clayton
PT, Leonard
JV. The significance of elevated CSF lactate.
Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(11):1188-1189.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 26.Fein
D, Barton
M, Eigsti
IM,
et al. Optimal outcome in individuals with a history of autism.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;54(2):195-205.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 27.Beal
MF. Mitochondria take center stage in aging and neurodegeneration.
Ann Neurol. 2005;58(4):495-505.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 28.Manji
H, Kato
T, Di Prospero
NA,
et al. Impaired mitochondrial function in psychiatric disorders.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(5):293-307.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 30.Matsumoto
K, Tanaka
K. Neuroscience: conflict and cognitive control.
Science. 2004;303(5660):969-970.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 31.Stigler
KA, McDonald
BC, Anand
A, Saykin
AJ, McDougle
CJ. Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging of autism spectrum disorders.
Brain Res. 2011;1380:146-161.
PubMedGoogle Scholar