A 14-Month Randomized Clinical Trial of Treatment Strategies for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder | Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders | JAMA Psychiatry | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Popper  CW Disorders usually first evident in infancy, childhood, or adolescence. Talbott  JAHales  REYudofsky  SCeds. Textbook of Psychiatry Washington, DC American Psychiatric Press1988;649- 735Google Scholar
Barkley  RA Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Mash  EJBarkley  RAeds. Child Psychopathology New York, NY Guilford Press1996;63- 112Google Scholar
Hinshaw  SP Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence: causal relationships and underlying mechanisms.  Psychol Bull. 1992;111127- 155Google ScholarCrossref
Spencer  TBiederman  JWilens  THarding  MO'Donnell  DGriffin  S Pharmacotherapy of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder across the life cycle.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996;35409- 432Google ScholarCrossref
Swanson  J Effect of stimulant medication on hyperactive children: a review of reviews.  Except Child. 1993;60154- 162Google Scholar
Pelham  WEMurphy  HA Behavioral and pharmacological treatment of hyperactivity and attention-deficit disorders. Herson  MBreuning  SEeds. Pharmacological and Behavioral Treatment An Integrative Approach New York, NY John Wiley & Sons Inc1986;108- 147Google Scholar
Hinshaw  SPKlein  RGAbikoff  H Childhood attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: nonpharmacologic and combination treatments. Nathan  PEGorman  JMeds. A Guide to Treatments That Work New York, NY Oxford University Press1998;26- 41Google Scholar
Pelham  WEWheeler  TChronis  A Empirically supported psychosocial treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.  J Clin Child Psychol. 1998;27190- 205Google ScholarCrossref
Gillberg  CMelander  Hvon Knorring  ALJanols  LOThernlund  GHagglof  BEidevall-Wallin  LGustafsson  PKopp  S Long-term stimulant treatment of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54857- 864Google ScholarCrossref
Hechtman  LAbikoff  H Multimodal treatment plus stimulants vs stimulant treatment in ADHD children: results from a two year comparative treatment study.  Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry October 17-22, 1995 New Orleans, La.
Jensen  PSBhatara  VSVitiello  BHoagwood  KFeil  MBurke  LB Psychoactive medication prescribing practices for US children: gaps between research and clinical practice.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999;38557- 565Google ScholarCrossref
Safer  DJZito  JMFine  EM Increased methylphenidate usage for attention deficit disorder in the 1990s.  Pediatrics. 1996;981084- 1088Google Scholar
Sloan  MJensen  PKettle  L Assessing services for children with ADHD: gaps and opportunities.  J Attention Disord. 1999;313- 29Google ScholarCrossref
Richters  JArnold  LEAJensen  PSAbikoff  HConners  CKGreenhill  LLHechtman  LHinshaw  SPPelham  WESwanson  JM NIMH Collaborative Multisite, Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With ADHD, I: background and rationale.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995;34987- 1000Google ScholarCrossref
Greenhill  LLAbikoff  HBArnold  LECantwell  DPConners  CKElliott  GHechtman  LHinshaw  SPHoza  BJensen  PSMarch  JSNewcorn  JHPelham  WESevere  JBSwanson  JMVitiello  BWells  KC Medication treatment strategies in the MTA: relevance to clinicians and researchers.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996;351304- 1313Google ScholarCrossref
Arnold  LEAbikoff  HBCantwell  DPConners  CKElliott  GGreenhill  LLHechtman  LHinshaw  SPHoza  BJensen  PSKraemer  HCMarch  JSNewcorn  JHPelham  WERichters  JESchiller  ESevere  JBSwanson  JMVereen  DWells  KC National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With ADHD (the MTA): design challenges and choices.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54865- 870Google ScholarCrossref
Arnold  LEAbikoff  HCantwell  DPConners  CKElliott  GGreenhill  LLHechtman  LHinshaw  SPHoza  BJensen  PSKraemer  HCMarch  JSNewcorn  JHPelham  WERichters  JESchiller  ESevere  JBSwanson  JMVereen  DWells  KC NIMH Collaborative Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With ADHD (MTA): design, methodology, and protocol evolution.  J Attention Disord. 1997;2141- 158Google ScholarCrossref
Hinshaw  SPMarch  JSAbikoff  HArnold  LECantwell  DPConners  CKElliott  GEHalperin  JGreenhill  LLHechtman  LTHoza  BJensen  PSNewcorn  JHMcBurnett  KPelham  WERichters  JESevere  JBSchiller  ESwanson  JVereen  DWells  KWigal  T Comprehensive assessment of childhood attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in the context of a multisite, multimodal clinical trial.  J Attention Disord. 1997;1217- 234Google ScholarCrossref
Wells  KPelham  WEKotkin  RAHoza  BAbikoff  HArnold  LEAbramowitz  ACantwell  DPConners  CKDel Carmen  RElliott  GGreenhill  LLHechtman  LTHinshaw  SPJensen  PSMarch  JSSchiller  ESevere  JSwanson  JM Psychosocial treatment strategies in the MTA study: rationale, methods, and critical issues in design and implementation.  J Abnorm Child Psychol. In press.Google Scholar
Hedeker  DGibbons  RD MIXREG: a computer program for mixed-effects regression analysis with autocorrelated errors.  Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1996;49229- 252Google ScholarCrossref
Hedeker  DGibbons  RD MIXOR: a computer program for mixed-effects ordinal regression analysis.  Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1996;49157- 176Google ScholarCrossref
Wolraich  MLHannah  JNBaumgaertel  AFeurer  ID Examination of DSM-IV criteria for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a county-wide sample.  J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1998;19162- 168Google ScholarCrossref
Shaffer  DFisher  PDulcan  MDavies  MPiacentini  JSchwab-Stone  MLahey  BBourdon  KJensen  PBird  HCanino  GRegier  D The second version of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-2).  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996;35865- 877Google ScholarCrossref
Cohen  J Statistical Power Analyses for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence A Erlbaum Associates1988;
Kazdin  AEBass  D Power to test differences between alternative treatments in comparative psychotherapy outcome research.  J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989;57138- 147Google ScholarCrossref
Conners  CK Manual for the Conners' Rating Scales.  Toronto, Ontario Multi-Health Systems1990;
Lahey  BBApplegate  BMcBurnett  KBiederman  JGreenhill  LHynd  GWBarkley  RANewcorn  JJensen  PRichters  JGarfinkel  BKerdyk  LFrick  POllendick  TPerez  DHart  EWaldman  IShaffer  D DSM-IV field trials for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents.  Am J Psychiatry. 1993;1511673- 1685Google Scholar
Biederman  JNewcorn  JSprich  S Comorbidity of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with conduct, depressive, anxiety, and other disorders.  Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148564- 577Google Scholar
Nottelmann  EJensen  P Comorbidity of disorders in children and adolescents: developmental perspectives. Ollendick  TPrinz  Reds. Advances in Clinical Child Psychology Vol 17 New York, NY Plenum Publishing Corp1995;109- 155Google Scholar
Szatmari  POfford  DRBoyle  MH Correlates, associated impairments and patterns of services utilization of children with attention deficit disorder: findings from the Ontario Child Health Study.  J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1989;30205- 217Google ScholarCrossref
Swanson  JM School-based Assessments and Interventions for ADD Students.  Irvine, Calif KC Publications1992;
Gresham  FMElliott  SN Social Skills Rating System: Automated System for Scoring and Interpreting Standardized Test [computer program]. Version 1 Circle Pines, Minn American Guidance Systems1989;
March  JSParker  JDSullivan  KStallings  PConners  CK The Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC): factor structure, reliability, and validity.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36554- 565Google ScholarCrossref
Not Available, Wechsler Individual Achievement Test: Manual.  San Antonio, Tex Psychological Corp1992;
Abikoff  HGittelman  R Classroom observation code: a modification of the Stony Brook Code.  Psychopharmacol Bull. 1985;21901- 909Google Scholar
Barkley  RA Defiant Children: A Clinician's Manual for Parent Training.  New York, NY Guilford Press1987;
Forehand  RMacMahon  R Helping the Noncompliant Child: A Clinician's Guide to Parent Training.  New York, NY Guilford Press1980;
Pelham  WEHoza  B Comprehensive treatment for ADHD: a proposal for intensive summer treatment programs and outpatient follow-up. Hibbs  EJensen  Peds. Psychosocial Treatment Research of Child and Adolescent Disorders Washington, DC American Psychiatric Press1996;311- 340Google Scholar
Pelham  WWaschbusch  D Behavioral intervention in ADHD. Quay  HPHogan  AEeds. Handbook of Disruptive Behavior Disorders New York, NY Plenum Publishing Corp1999;255- 278Google Scholar
The MTA Cooperative Group, Mediators and moderators of treatment response for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Study.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;561088- 1096Google ScholarCrossref
Pelham  W Pharmacotherapy for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.  School Psychol Rev. 1993;22199- 227Google Scholar
Carlson  CLPelham  WEMilich  RDixon  J Single and combined effects of methylphenidate and behavior therapy on the classroom performance of children with ADHD.  J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1992;20213- 231Google ScholarCrossref
Laird  NMWare  JH Random effect models for longitudinal data.  Biometrics. 1982;38963- 974Google ScholarCrossref
Bryk  ASRaudenbush  SW Toward a more appropriate conceptualization of research on school effects: a three-level heirarchical linear model.  Am J Educ. 1988;9768- 108Google ScholarCrossref
Gibbons  RDHedeker  DElkin  IWaternaux  CKraemer  HCGreenhouse  JShea  MTImber  SDSotsky  SMWatkins  JT Some conceptual and statistical issues in analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data: application to the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program dataset.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50739- 750Google ScholarCrossref
Hedeker  DGibbons  RDFlay  BR Random-effects regression models for clustered data with an example from smoking prevention research.  J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;62757- 765Google ScholarCrossref
Swanson  JMKraemer  HCHinshaw  SP Conceptual and methodologic issues in the evaluation of treatment effectiveness for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.  J Child Psychol Psychiatry. In press.Google Scholar
Hinshaw  SPHenker  BWhalen  CKErhardt  DDunnington  RE Aggressive, prosocial, and nonsocial behavior in hyperactive boys: dose effects of methylphenidate in naturalistic settings.  J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989;57636- 643Google ScholarCrossref
Schachar  RJTannock  RCunningham  CCorkum  PV Behavioral, situational, and temporal effects of treatment of ADHD with methylphenidate.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36754- 763Google ScholarCrossref
Long  NRickert  VIAshcraft  EW Bibliotherapy as an adjunct to stimulant medication in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.  J Pediatr Health Care. 1993;782- 88Google ScholarCrossref
Ialongo  NSHorn  WFPascoe  JMGreenberg  GPackard  TLopez  MWagner  APuttler  L The effects of a multimodal intervention with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder children: a 9-month follow-up.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1993;32182- 189Google ScholarCrossref
Klein  RGAbikoff  H Behavior therapy and methylphenidate in the treatment of children with ADHD.  J Attention Disord. 1997;289- 114Google ScholarCrossref
Kraemer  HC Reporting the size of effects in research studies to facilitate assessment of practical or clinical significance.  Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1992;17527- 536Google ScholarCrossref
Firestone  PCrowe  DGoodman  JTMcGrath  P Vicissitudes of follow-up studies: differential effects of parent training and stimulant medication with hyperactives.  Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1986;56184- 194Google ScholarCrossref
Biederman  JMilberger  SFaraone  SVKiely  KGuite  JMick  EAblon  SWarburton  RReed  E Family-environment risk factors for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a test of Rutter's indicators of adversity.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52464- 470Google ScholarCrossref
Original Article
December 1999

A 14-Month Randomized Clinical Trial of Treatment Strategies for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

The MTA Cooperative Group
Author Affiliations

The Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (the MTA study) is a cooperative treatment study performed by 6 independent research teams in collaboration with the Division of Services and Intervention Research, National Institute of Mental Health, and the Office of Special Education Programs, US Department of Education, Washington, DC.

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(12):1073-1086. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.12.1073

Background  Previous studies have demonstrated the short-term efficacy of pharmacotherapy and behavior therapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but no longer-term (ie, >4 months) investigations have compared these 2 treatments or their combination.

Methods  A group of 579 children with ADHD Combined Type, aged 7 to 9.9 years, were assigned to 14 months of medication management (titration followed by monthly visits); intensive behavioral treatment (parent, school, and child components, with therapist involvement gradually reduced over time); the two combined; or standard community care (treatments by community providers). Outcomes were assessed in multiple domains before and during treatment and at treatment end point (with the combined treatment and medication management groups continuing medication at all assessment points). Data were analyzed through intent-to-treat random-effects regression procedures.

Results  All 4 groups showed sizable reductions in symptoms over time, with significant differences among them in degrees of change. For most ADHD symptoms, children in the combined treatment and medication management groups showed significantly greater improvement than those given intensive behavioral treatment and community care. Combined and medication management treatments did not differ significantly on any direct comparisons, but in several instances (oppositional/aggressive symptoms, internalizing symptoms, teacher-rated social skills, parent-child relations, and reading achievement) combined treatment proved superior to intensive behavioral treatment and/or community care while medication management did not. Study medication strategies were superior to community care treatments, despite the fact that two thirds of community-treated subjects received medication during the study period.

Conclusions  For ADHD symptoms, our carefully crafted medication management was superior to behavioral treatment and to routine community care that included medication. Our combined treatment did not yield significantly greater benefits than medication management for core ADHD symptoms, but may have provided modest advantages for non-ADHD symptom and positive functioning outcomes.