Anatomic correlates of the stimulus-induced activation patterns in 10 healthy control subjects (A) and 10 first-episode schizophrenic patients (B). The patient group shows a reduced right thalamic blood oxygen level–dependent response (B, red arrow) in addition to a lack of prefrontal activation seen in control subjects (A, red arrow) (SPM99 software; Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, University College, London, London, England, group analysis, P<.05, corrected for volume of interest).
Visualization of the interaction analysis results (SPM99 software; Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, University College, London, London, England, P<.05, corrected for volume of interest). Compared with schizophrenic patients (n= 10), the spatial extent of activation patterns in healthy subjects (n =10) is significantly increased in the highlighted anatomic areas of the prefrontal areas (frontal eye field, Brodmann area 46) (A) and the dorsal visual processing pathway (B).
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Braus DF, Weber-Fahr W, Tost H, Ruf M, Henn FA. Sensory Information Processing in Neuroleptic-Naive First-Episode Schizophrenic Patients: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59(8):696–701. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.59.8.696
Copyright 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.2002
Schizophrenic disorders are thought to involve widespread abnormalities in information processing. The present study used functional magnetic resonance imaging and a simple and robust paradigm that involved auditory and visual activation to examine basic sensory input circuits. Our aim was to determine which stages of the input processing network are disturbed in first-episode schizophrenic patients.
Twelve neuroleptic-naive inpatients (paranoid subtype) were compared with 11 healthy subjects by means of echo-planar functional magnetic resonance imaging. In a block design, the paradigm included the simultaneous presentation of a moving 6-Hz checkerboard and auditory stimuli in the form of drumbeats. The subjects were asked to simply look and listen.
In comparison with control subjects, patients showed reduced activation in the right thalamus, the right prefrontal cortex, and the parietal lobe(restricted to the dorsal visual pathway) bilaterally. There were no notable differences in the primary visual cortex or the object-specific occipitotemporal pathway. In addition, patients presented with a reduced signal change to auditory stimulation in the left acoustic cortex.
The present study supports the concept of widespread cortical and subcortical deficits in schizophrenia. Our findings suggest abnormal functioning early in the information processing and in high-order association cortices already at illness onset, before the administration of medication or the most confounding effects of illness duration. The main regions have been implicated in visual motion perception and discrimination as well as in attention to sensorial events and perceptual synthesis.
THE SCHIZOPHRENIA spectrum is widely recognized as a heterogeneous disorder. Investigators have consistently tried to identify the neurobiological substrate of information processing deficits that are characteristic of most schizophrenic patients.1-3 It has been hypothesized that there are widespread abnormalities in the early stages of information processing leading to a cascade of "downstream" effects on higher cortical functions, such as sustained attention, working memory, concept formation, or social functioning.4
The goal of the present study was to use functional magnetic resonance(fMR) imaging5 to demonstrate abnormality in information processing circuits in first-episode, neuroleptic-naive schizophrenic patients. In general, functional imaging findings in acutely ill schizophrenic patients have been criticized, as patients might be unable to understand and perform complicated cognitive tasks. Keeping this in mind, the present study was designed with the use of a simple and robust input paradigm requiring little cognitive effort, which would allow an evaluation of elementary information processing. The paradigm chosen included the simultaneous presentation of2 sensory stimuli without information content, (1) an alternating visual checkerboard(6 Hz) as well as (2) an acoustic stimulus consisting of drumbeats. The use of 2 different modalities should involve both the information flow through the thalamus to the low- and high-order sensory cortices (V1-V5 and A1, A2) in the temporal and occipital lobes and processing in the frontoparietal cortices. Two inputs were chosen to stimulate perceptual synthesis and to maximize activation of the heteromodal association cortices. Thus far, the functional interaction of the information processing stream via visual and acoustic input channels has not been directly studied in schizophrenia. Therefore, this study may serve as a starting point for further research aimed at identifying functional differences in the various levels of information processing deficits. We hypothesized that even minimal cognitive effort might disclose dysfunction in different levels of the information processing network, particularly in the thalamus and frontoparietal association areas.
Twelve inpatients (6 men and 6 women; average [±SD] age, 25.1 ± 4.8 years; school education, 10.6 ± 1.8 years) living in the community of Mannheim, Germany, and satisfying DSM-IV as well as International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) criteria for schizophrenia along with 11 healthy control subjects (6 men and 5 women; average age, 29.4 ± 6.2 years; school education, 12.0 ± 1.4 years) participated in this study. Control subjects were recruited through advertisements; all patients entered the study after first psychiatric hospitalization. All were right-handed according to the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory.6 All inpatients were neuroleptic-naive, having their first schizophrenic episode with the predominance of delusions, hallucinations, and distrust. Particular care was taken to exclude patients with a history of neurologic disorders or substance abuse. All patients had undergone thorough neurologic examination, showing no abnormalities. Urine screening for drug usage was negative. All stabilized patients were rediagnosed 6 months after the initial examination, and the diagnosis was stable in all cases.
The healthy volunteers were given a structured screening interview. Exclusion criteria included a history of significant medical, neurologic, or psychiatric illnesses as well as substance abuse. Written informed consent was obtained after the purpose of the study and the procedures had been explained to all participants. The study was approved by the local university ethics committee.
The fMR imaging paradigm included the simultaneous presentation of a flickering 6-Hz checkerboard and auditory stimuli in the form of drumbeats, with the specific instruction just to look and listen. Visual stimuli were generated by a computer (Apple PowerBook; Apple Computer Corp, Cupertino, Calif; MacStim; David Darby, PhD, FRACP, West Melbourne, Australia) and displayed on a back projection plane at the foot end of the scanner via a liquid crystal display projector (Sharp Electronics Corporation, Mahway, NJ). Subjects were in a supine position and viewed the screen through an adjustable mirror fixed to the head coil. Acoustic stimuli were presented through customized magnetic resonance headphones. The 2 experimental conditions (stimulation and fixation) were recorded in 5 sequences of 10 measurements in alternating order.
Images were acquired on a standard clinical 1.5-T MR imager (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany). For fMR imaging, a standard echo planar imaging sequence(repetition time, 1.8 milliseconds; echo time, 66 milliseconds; α =90°; T2* contrast) with an in-plane resolution of 64 × 64 pixels(19 slices; 3-mm thickness; gap factor, 0.3; field of view, 220 × 220 mm) was used. For anatomic reference, a 3-dimensional magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo image data set was acquired. The fMR imaging slices were oriented axially parallel to the anterior commissure–posterior commissure line according to Talairach and Tournoux.7 Each functional T2* slice was imaged 100 times in a total period of 310 seconds. A vacuum pad was used to improve head fixation and to minimize involuntary head movement.
For data analysis we used a general linear model as employed by SPM99 software (Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, University College, London, London, England).8 Our inferences were based on P values adjusted for the volume of interest by means of random field theory. We used a 2-stage analysis procedure where the contrasts reflecting activations in each subject were entered into a second-level analysis to emulate a random-effect analysis. This allows us to generalize our inferences to the populations from which our control subjects and patients were drawn. We first looked at the main effects of visual and auditory stimulation in both groups and then analyzed the interaction or differences in activation.
The first 5 volumes of each functional time series were discarded because of T1 effects. All volumes were realigned to the remaining first volume as correction for interscan movements by means of a rigid body transformation with 6 parameters (3 rotations and 3 translations). A T1-weighted 3-dimensional magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (1.05 × 1.05 × 1-mm voxel size) was coregistered to the first T2* image. This procedure ensures that the functional (fMR) and structural data are part of the same coordinate system. The structural image was spatially normalized to a standard template by means of a 12-parameter affine transformation with additional nonlinear components,9,10 where the deformations were modeled with smooth (spatial) basis functions (ie, 3-dimensional discrete cosine basis function set). The nonlinear transformation was subsequently applied to the T2* data. The data were smoothed with a 12-mm full width at half maximum isotropic gaussian kernel for individual analysis and for group analysis. Data were analyzed by modeling the different conditions (stimulation and fixation) as boxcar functions convoluted with the hemodynamic response function (individual threshold P<.001) in the context of a general linear model.
Specific effects were tested by applying appropriate linear contrasts to the parameter estimates for each condition, resulting in a T-statistic for each individual voxel. The statistical parametric map constitutes the T-values. The contrast used was +1 for visual and auditory stimulation and –1 for the fixation condition. Data were analyzed by including the contrast images of all subjects of each group (first-episode patients and control subjects) into a second-level group analysis with a threshold of P<.05 corrected for the entire volume or the volume of interest.11,12 One-sample t tests were performed to test for in-group correspondences and 2-sample t tests to identify areas that are less active in schizophrenic patients compared with control subjects.
The study groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, sex, or educational achievement. On average, patients were investigated 6.5 months after inception of prodromal signs. Patients presented with moderate psychotic symptoms as indicated by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (mean ± SD score, 49.9 ± 5.7). None of the participants had ever received neuroleptic medication before being enrolled in the study. Overall head motions were evaluated with SPM99 software. Two patients and 1 control subject had to be excluded because of motion artifacts exceeding 1.5 mm in the x, y, or z direction. Structural MR images and showed no abnormalities in any of the participants.
Comparing visual and acoustic stimulation and fixation, the group analysis showed a significant (P<.05) activation of the primary visual cortex (V1) and extrastriate areas (V2-V5) as well as the superior temporal auditory cortices A1 and A2 (Table1). A stimulation-induced enhancement of local blood oxygen level–dependent MR signals could also be traced subcortically bilaterally in dorsolateral thalamic areas corresponding to the lateral and medial geniculate nuclei. Increased activation was also seen in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, where a pronounced right-sided activation in the inferior portion was detected. Figure 1 shows the localization of the activation overlaid onto a glass brain.
The group analysis of the different perceptual conditions in the neuroleptic-naive first-episode patient group showed a significant activation in the primary visual (V1), extrastriate (V2-V5), and auditory cortices (A1, A2) of the brain. Thalamic activation patterns were more pronounced in the lateral and medial geniculate nuclei of the left hemisphere. A significant blood oxygen level–dependent response of prefrontal areas was totally missing in our patient group. Table 1 shows the amount and the localization of stimulus-induced activations.
The application of a rigorous interaction analysis allows the selective detection of cerebral areas that are less active in the schizophrenic sample and enhanced in healthy control subjects. The schizophrenic patients showed a markedly reduced response of the right posterior thalamic relay nuclei, which are concerned with subcortical processing of sensory information (lateral and medial geniculate nuclei). Higher-order extrastriate cortices of the middle occipital and inferior parietal lobes corresponding to the dorsal visual processing pathway were found to be hypoactive in the patients bilaterally. Furthermore, a reduced prefrontal activation level of the right frontal eye field and the intermediate frontal gyrus corresponding to Brodmann area 46 was detected along with a reduced blood oxygen level–dependent-response in the left acoustic cortices of the superior temporal lobe (Table 2). Figure 1 and Figure 2 outline the "hypoactive" cortical regions of the first-episode schizophrenic patients from a lateral and posterior angle on a normalized brain.
Using a very simple perceptual fMR imaging paradigm that minimized the effect of cognitive effort and motivation, we examined the circuitry involved in the fundamental processing of simultaneous visual and auditory information in neuroleptic-naive first-episode schizophrenic patients compared with control subjects. We were able to demonstrate functional deficits in the first relay station of the right thalamus as a sign of abnormalities in early stages of information processing. This observation is consistent with positron emission tomographic studies,13,14 lending further support to the concept indicating both deficits in sensory gating in schizophrenia15 and a dysfunction in cortical-thalamic-cerebellar circuitry as proposed by Andreasen et al.16 In addition, cortical response to auditory stimulation in the left superior temporal gyrus was reduced in our acutely ill patients, with at least 9 of them experiencing auditory hallucinations. This latter result is in full agreement with fMR imaging data from David et al17 showing that response of the temporal cortex to exogenous auditory stimulation was markedly reduced in patients experiencing auditory hallucinations, regardless of medication. The major new finding of the present study is that, after simultaneous visuoauditory stimulation, schizophrenic patients activate to a lesser extent than do normal subjects bilaterally in the inferoposterior parietal cortex and regions of the right prefrontal cortex. In contrast to this specific hypofunction of the dorsal visual pathway, we did not find any differences in the primary visual cortex or the object-specific occipitotemporal stream.
One emerging architectural principle of functional brain organization in information processing is that neuronal responses expressed at any level in a perceptual hierarchy reflect an interaction between "bottom-up"–driven afferents from lower subcortical and cortical areas and backward "modulatory" inputs from higher cortical regions that mediate top-down contextual effects.18-20 A compelling example is attentional modulation of responses in functionally specialized areas. Vision is an especially fruitful domain for studying distributed neural systems in the human brain. Major functions are comparable with those in nonhuman primates, with the neuroanatomy and neurophysiology of the monkey visual system being well known.21
The differential visual impairments produced by focal lesions in clinical cases suggest that the human visual cortex, like that of the monkey, may be similarly organized into 2 anatomically distinct and functionally specialized ventral and dorsal processing pathways. Occipitotemporal lesions include visual object agnosia, while those produced by occipitoparietal lesions include disorders in velocity detection and discrimination as well as attention deficits, visuospatial neglect, and dysfunction of spatial working memory.22,23 Both processing streams have reciprocal connections with regions beyond the modality-specific visual system.24 Anatomic studies have shown that projections from areas in the dorsal stream terminate around the frontal eye field and the principal sulcus of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann area 46) reciprocated by a top-down feedback projection via the prefrontal cortex.25 On the other hand, there is evidence that thalamocortical and corticocortical loops play a causal role in cooperative and competitive neural interactions26 and that frontoparietal connections are mediating spatial working memory27 as well as visual awareness and the organization of voluntary behavior contingent on sensory cues.28,29
It has been suggested that, in addition to thalamic gating, the maintenance of context and spatial working memory may underlie various deficits in information processing and attention observed in schizophrenic patients.30-32 This in turn would imply disturbances in the above-mentioned neural network in schizophrenic patients.33
This study showed a very specific profile of abnormal activation in the posterior parietal cortex and regions of the right prefrontal cortex (the right frontal eye field and Brodmann area 46) in schizophrenic patients. This points to a limited dysfunction in the dorsal visual processing stream, as opposed to the object-specific ventral visual pathway. The parietal and frontal regions implicated in our study are very similar to those activated during attention to visual motion in normal subjects18 as well as smooth-pursuit eye movements.34 Furthermore, these areas have been shown to be specifically involved in the formation of perceptual states and the awareness of sensory stimuli.29 Attentional deficits35,36 and impairments in the visual perception of motion signals37 as well as in smooth-pursuit eye movements38,39 are well documented in schizophrenia. The homology between our functional results and those behavioral markers may represent their underlying neurobiology. The noted abnormal frontoparietal activations could also reflect a functional interaction between visual and auditory cortical processing and a disturbed modulatory cognitive set in schizophrenia. This would mean that the site of abnormal activation must not necessarily be identical with the site of pathophysiology.
Our findings are clearly preliminary because of the small number of unmedicated first-episode patients available for this study and acquired in a naturalistic design. Because of the fMR imaging method, substracting the fixation baseline from the stimulation condition, we cannot exclude that patients showed more baseline activation during the fixation period in the frontoparietal areas than the control subjects, but equal activation during stimulation, appearing as a hypoactive response to stimulation. A further drawback of this study lies in the fact that these acutely ill patients were not examined for oculomotor and motion-perception deficits or spatial and nonspatial working memory, partly because of technical limitations and their limited compliance for extensive technical procedures. Clearly, one future goal should be more comprehensive studies using large numbers of well-characterized subjects (clinically and neuropsychologically), with a direct correlation of oculomotor performance and specific dorsal pathway activation tasks (eg, sinusodial grating or random dot paradigms) performed inside the magnet.40
Despite its constraints, this study confirms the concept of widespread cortical and subcortical deficits in schizophrenia. The regions implicated in our study suggest an abnormal functioning of the thalamus as well as high-order frontoparietal cortical areas that are restricted to the dorsal visual processing stream and have been implicated in attention to sensorial events and conscious perceptual synthesis. With respect to the syndromic nature of schizophrenia, we suggest that functional alterations within this information processing network represent a common pathophysiology rather than a common etiology. Our simple and robust fMR imaging paradigm may be useful for screening at-risk populations and for observing patients during the introduction of medication and throughout the longitudinal course of the illness.
Submitted for publication March 26, 2001; final revision received August16, 2001; accepted October 15, 2001.
This work was supported by grant DFG: BR 1112/5-1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn, Germany.
We thank Traute Demirakca, MSc, for valuable comments on the manuscript and Gunilla Oberthür, MTRA, for her help in performing the studies.
Corresponding author and reprints: Dieter F. Braus, MD, Central Institute of Mental Health (ZI), PO Box 122 120, D-68072 Mannheim, Germany (e-mail: email@example.com).
Create a personal account or sign in to: