Background
Negative feedback regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis occurs through a dual-receptor system of mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) and glucocorticoid receptors (GR). Their affinity for cortisol and their distribution in the brain differ. Studies using an MR antagonist have demonstrated that MR is active throughout the circadian rhythm. Because major depression is accompanied by increased glucocorticoid secretion and insensitivity to glucocorticoid feedback, and because glucocorticoids are capable of down-regulating MR and GR, we expected that major depression would be accompanied by decreased MR activity.
Methods
To test this hypothesis, we administered spironolactone, an MR antagonist, to individuals with major depression and matched control subjects and assessed levels of corticotropin and cortisol secretion in response to this acute challenge. Studies were conducted in the morning, the time of peak activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. All patients were currently depressed and free of all medications. All controls were free of all psychiatric diagnoses and of all medications.
Results
Spironolactone treatment resulted in a significant increase in cortisol secretion levels in both groups. Depressed patients demonstrated higher cortisol secretion levels than control subjects. In addition, depressed patients demonstrated a different pattern of increase in cortisol secretion levels after spironolactone administration. Furthermore, a significant effect of spironolactone treatment on corticotropin secretion levels can be observed in depressed patients, whereas controls show no such effect.
Conclusions
Despite high baseline cortisol levels, patients with major depression show high functional activity of the MR system. Paired with the body of evidence regarding decreased sensitivity to GR agonists, these data suggest an imbalance in the MR/GR ratio. The balance of MR and GR is known to affect brain serotonin systems and may play an etiologic role in serotonin receptor changes observed in patients with major depression.
NEGATIVE FEEDBACK regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis occurs through a dual-receptor system of mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) and glucocorticoid receptors (GR).1-3 These receptors differ in their affinity for glucocorticoids, with MR demonstrating the highest affinity for cortisol and GR demonstrating lower affinity for cortisol.1-3 In addition, their distribution in rodent brain differs, with MR predominantly in limbic areas, particularly the hippocampus, and GR more widely distributed across all brain regions4,5; in primates, MR is also found in cortex and subcortical structures.6 Thus, MR is a high-affinity, low-capacity receptor, whereas GR is a low-affinity, high-capacity receptor. A variety of studies7-9 in animals have documented the importance of MR in stress regulation. Because of the low levels of circulating cortisol in the nadir, MR is believed to be more important in the regulation of HPA axis drive in the evening, the time when depressed patients are most likely to demonstrate increased central drive.2,3,10-13 However, studies using an MR antagonist in rodents14 and in humans15 have demonstrated that MR is active throughout the circadian rhythm and that antagonism results in increased cortisol secretion in both the morning and evening.
Because major depression is accompanied by increased glucocorticoid secretion and insensitivity to dexamethasone, and glucocorticoids are capable of down-regulating MR and GR,16-21 we expected that major depression would be accompanied by decreased MR activity. Furthermore, postmortem studies22 on depressed suicide victims have also observed decreased MR messenger RNA in the hippocampus compared with healthy individuals. To test this hypothesis, we administered spironolactone, an MR antagonist, to patients with major depression and matched control subjects and assessed corticotropin and cortisol secretion in response to this acute challenge.
Twelve depressed patients and 12 age- and sex-matched controls were studied. Depressed patients were recruited from patients at the University of Michigan Mood Disorders Program who were seeking treatment for new episodes of depression or in response to advertisements for untreated depressed individuals. Controls were recruited through newspaper advertising. All subjects were medically healthy and had not been treated for the current episode of depression. None were taking psychotropic medications, oral contraceptives, or any other medications, except aspirin or acetaminophen, for more than 3 months before the study. No participants engaged in shift work for more than 3 months before the study. No subject was breastfeeding, pregnant, or within 1 year of childbirth. Findings from screening blood work were within the reference range. Smokers were excluded from the protocol. Results of the urine drug screens were negative for all participants at the time of the study.
All depressed patients underwent a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV to confirm the presence of major depressive disorder. Controls underwent the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, nonpatient version. A structured 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale interview was administered by a trained clinician (clinical nurse specialist V.M.-W.) to rate severity of depression.
The study consisted of a 2-day protocol with administration of placebo on day 1 and spironolactone (200 mg) on day 2. Participants arrived at the research area between 6:30 and 7 AM, and an intravenous catheter was inserted at that time. Participants were given an hour to adapt before administration of either placebo or spironolactone. Blood samples for corticotropin and cortisol measurement were drawn every 30 minutes between 8 AM and 2 PM. Participants ate a standardized breakfast at 7 AM and then fasted until completion of blood drawing at 2 PM. Blood samples were collected on ice and centrifuged immediately. Corticotropin was assayed using Allegro HS-IRMA (Nichols Lab, San Juan Capistrano, Calif). Cortisol was assayed using DPC Coat-a-Count Assay Kits (Diagnostic Products Corp, Los Angeles, Calif).
All hormone data were log transformed before analyses. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance, with treatment (spironolactone vs placebo), group (depressed patients vs control subjects), and time (repeated measures) as factors.
We studied 12 patients with major depression (5 men and 7 women; mean ± SD age, 31.6 ± 9.11 years). The 12 age- and sex-matched control subjects had a mean ± SD age of 31.5 ± 8.6 years. All patients met the Research Diagnostic Criteria for primary major depressive disorder. Of patients with major depression, 4 were experiencing their first episode of major depression, 7 were recurrent unipolar, and 1 was bipolar. In 4 patients, dysthymia preceded the onset of major depression. Three patients demonstrated currently active comorbid anxiety disorders, and 3 additional patients had a history of anxiety disorders. Patients with any other Axis I disorders were excluded. The mean ± SD Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score for depressed patients was 18.0 ± 4.5.
Cortisol data for depressed patients and matched controls are shown in Figure 1. As in a previous study,15 spironolactone treatment resulted in a significant increase in cortisol secretion (F1 = 7.4; P =.009). As would be expected, there was also a significant effect of time on cortisol secretion, reflecting the normal circadian fall (F12 =13.9; P<.001). Depressed patients demonstrated higher cortisol secretion than control subjects on both days (F1 =4.0; P = .05 for group). In addition, depressed patients demonstrated a different pattern in response to spironolactone administration, which is an actual increase in cortisol secretion rather than a delay in the circadian fall, as seen in control subjects (significant interaction between group and time, F12 = 5.0; P<.001). This is further illustrated by comparing controls and depressed patients on the spironolactone treatment day only, starting at 9 AM, after the circadian fall in both groups, where there is a significant interaction between group and repeated measures (F9 = 1.98; P =.04).
As in a previous study,15 the effect of spironolactone treatment on corticotropin secretion levels in patients and controls was transient (Figure 2). Although in previous studies an effect on corticotropin secretion levels was not observed, an effect was found in this study (interaction between treatment and time, F12 = 1.8; P = .04). This effect is predominantly caused by depressed patients because a significant effect of spironolactone treatment on corticotropin secretion levels was observed in depressed patients alone (interaction between time and treatment, F12 = 2.0; P = .02), whereas controls showed no such interaction (F12 = 0.7; P = .7). We also observed differences in depressed patients and control subjects over time in corticotropin levels, such that overall, depressed patients demonstrated higher corticotropin levels on both days (Figure 2A vs B, F12 = 1.97; P =.02 for group).
Because MR and GR participate in HPA axis regulation in depression, we evaluated functional MR tone in patients with major depression and matched control subjects using an MR antagonist (spironolactone). The results of this study indicate that MR is still quite active in patients with major depression, suggesting that MR is still playing an important role in restraining the HPA axis. This high level of MR activity occurs in depressed patients despite the higher cortisol level observed on the placebo day, which would be expected to down-regulate MR. In fact, depressed patients demonstrate an increase in cortisol secretion in response to spironolactone treatment, suggesting that MR is functionally more active in depressed patients than in controls. This observation is confirmed in the corticotropin data. In a previous study15 on healthy individuals, an effect of spironolactone treatment on corticotropin secretion was not demonstrated, but in the present study, we observed this effect in depressed patients, whereas the effect was still too transient in control subjects to detect statistically. This suggests that depressed patients are more sensitive to MR antagonism, as manifested by the corticotropin and cortisol data, with increased MR activity at baseline. Both groups had increases in levels of cortisol secretion in response to spironolactone therapy, with the highest levels demonstrated in depressed patients after spironolactone administration.
Mineralocorticoid receptors and GR can form heterodimers and thus cooperate in the regulation of genes, and these heterodimers have been demonstrated to be more active than either MR-MR or GR-GR homodimers in some systems.23 In agreement with these data, we found that antagonism of MR by administration of spironolactone resulted in elevated levels of cortisol secretion in both the morning and evening, despite the presence of cortisol levels in the morning in the middle of the GR range of feedback inhibition. These data suggested that MR and GR are active throughout the day in controls and depressed patients.
The response to spironolactone treatment combined with decreased sensitivity to dexamethasone, a GR agonist, suggests that major depression is accompanied by a shift in MR/GR balance. Because we did not measure GR function, we cannot be sure that decreased GR function is found in these individuals. However, even if GR function was normal, the MR/GR balance would be altered. Although MR and GR are synergistic in their effects on HPA axis inhibition, this was not the case in all systems.24-28 In fact, the effects of MR and GR can be antagonistic, as has been demonstrated for neuronal excitability in the hippocampus.26 Furthermore, other studies26 have demonstrated that acute activation of MR lowers serotonin (5-HT) release and turnover and reduces 5-HT–mediated responses in the hippocampus. After MR down-regulation, 5-HT1A receptor–mediated hyperpolarization is decreased.27 In contrast, high levels of glucocorticoids trigger GR-stimulated serotonin transmission and lead to increased 5-HT responses.26
In addition to the differential effect in 5-HT turnover and transmission, MR and GR have differential effects in 5-HT receptor expression. The MR seems to be the primary mediator of 5-HT1A down-regulation observed after chronic stress or elevated glucocorticoid levels,27,28 whereas GR is the primary receptor involved in the 5-HT2A increases after stress and exogenous glucocorticoid administration.29-32 Major depression is accompanied by down-regulation of 5-HT1A receptors and messenger RNA in the brain and lymphocytes, as seen in postmortem studies24,33 or in vivo imaging,34,35 and increased 5-HT2A binding.36-38 Thus, the increased MR activity demonstrated in this study would be expected to lead to 5-HT1A down-regulation.
Furthermore, these 2 serotonin receptors are targets for antidepressant action, particularly tricyclic antidepressants. Rodent studies39 have shown that long-term antidepressant drug administration results in functional "up-regulation" of the postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor in the hippocampus. Some studies have also reported a modest increase in 5-HT1A receptor numbers in the hippocampus after antidepressant drug administration to rodents.40,41 Studies42 have reported decreases in 5-HT2A binding in the prefrontal cortex after long-term antidepressant administration. These findings have led some investigators to propose that postsynaptic 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors have functionally opposing effects,43 that a disturbed balance of these receptors may be contributing to the pathophysiology of depression,44 and that restoring this balance is necessary for antidepressant action.45 Consequently, the increased functional activity of MR found in major depression suggests that even high levels of glucocorticoids are not engaging compensatory changes to buffer the MR effects on brain serotonin systems.
In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that despite high baseline cortisol levels, patients with major depression increased functional activity of the MR system. Paired with the body of evidence regarding decreased sensitivity to GR agonists, these data suggest an imbalance in the MR/GR ratio. The balance of MR and GR is known to affect brain serotonin systems and may play an etiologic role in serotonin receptor changes, particularly 5-HT1A down-regulation, observed in major depression.
Corresponding author and reprints: Elizabeth A. Young, MD, Mental Health Research Institute and Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, 205 Zina Pitcher Pl, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0720 (e-mail:eayoung@umich.edu)
Submitted for publication February 7, 2002; final revision received May 23, 2002; accepted June 6, 2002.
This study was supported by grants PO1 MH42251 and MH 01931 (Dr Young) from the National Institute of Mental Health, and MO1 RR00042 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (general Clinical Research Unit), Bethesda, Md.
1.deKloet
RWallach
GMcEwen
BS Differences in corticosterone and dexamethasone binding to rat brain and pituitary.
Endocrinology. 1975;96598- 605
Google ScholarCrossref 2.Reul
JMHdeKloet
ER Two receptor systems for corticosterone in rat brain: microdistribution and differential occupation.
Endocrinology. 1985;1172505- 2511
Google ScholarCrossref 3.Spencer
RLYoung
EAChoo
PHMcEwen
BS Glucocorticoid type I and type II receptor binding: estimates of in vivo receptor number, occupancy and activation with varying levels of steroid.
Brain Res. 1990;51437- 48
Google ScholarCrossref 4.McEwen
BSWeiss
JMSchwartz
LS Selective retention of corticosterone by limbic structures in the rat brain.
Nature. 1968;220911- 913
Google ScholarCrossref 5.Herman
JPPatel
PDAkil
HWatson
S Localization and regulation of glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptor messenger RNAs in the hippocampal formation of the rat.
Mol Endocrinol. 1989;31886- 1894
Google ScholarCrossref 6.Patel
PDLópez
JFLyons
DMBurke
SWallace
MSchatzberg
AF Glucocortioid and mineralocorticoid receptor mRNA expression in squirrel monkey brain.
J Psychiatr Res. 2000;34383- 392
Google ScholarCrossref 7.Ratka
ASutanto
WBloemers
Mde Kloet
ER On the role of brain mineralocorticoid (type I) and glucocorticoid (type II) receptors in neuroendocrine regulation.
Neuroendocrinology. 1989;50117- 123
Google ScholarCrossref 8.Oitzl
MSvan Haarst
ADSutanto
Wde Kloet
ER Corticosterone, brain mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs) and the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis: the Lewis rat as an example of increased central MR capacity and a hyporesponsive HPA axis.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1995;20655- 675
Google ScholarCrossref 9.Gesing
ABilang-Bleuel
ADroste
SKLinthorst
ACHolsboer
FReul
JM Psychological stress increases hippocampal mineralocorticoid receptor levels: involvement of corticotropin-releasing hormone.
J Neurosci. 2001;214822- 4829
Google Scholar 10.Dallman
MFLevin
NCascio
CSAkana
SFJacobsen
LKuhn
RW Pharmacological evidence that the inhibition of diurnal adrenocorticotropin secretion by corticosteroids is mediated via type I corticosterone-preferring receptors.
Endocrinology. 1989;1242844- 2850
Google ScholarCrossref 11.Sapolsky
RMArmanini
MPPackan
DRSutton
SWPlotsky
PM Glucocorticoid feedback inhibition of adrenocorticotropic hormone secretagogue release: relationship to corticosteroid receptor occupancy in various limbic sites.
Neuroendocrinology. 1990;51328- 336
Google ScholarCrossref 12.Young
EAHaskett
RFGrunhaus
LPande
AWeinberg
VMWatson
SJAkil
H Increased circadian activation of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis in depressed patients in the evening.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51701- 707
Google ScholarCrossref 13.Young
EALopez
JFMurphy-Weinberg
VWatson
SJAkil
H Normal pituitary response to metyrapone in the morning in depressed patients: implications for circadian regulation of CRH secretion.
Biol Psychiatry. 1997;411149- 1155
Google ScholarCrossref 14.Bradbury
MJAkana
SFDallman
MF Roles of type I and II corticosteroid receptors in regulation of basal activity in the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis during the diurnal trough and the peak: evidence for a nonadditive effect of combined receptor occupation.
Endocrinology. 1994;1341286- 1296
Google Scholar 15.Young
EALopez
JFMurphy-Weinberg
VWatson
SJAkil
H The role of mineralocorticoid receptors in HPA axis regulation in humans.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;833339- 3345
Google Scholar 16.Halbreich
UAsnis
GMSchindledecker
RZurnoff
BNathan
RS Cortisol secretion in endogenous depression, I: basal plasma levels.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42904- 908
Google ScholarCrossref 17.Pfohl
BSherman
BSchlecter
JStone
R Pituitary/adrenal axis rhythm disturbances in psychiatric patients.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42897- 903
Google ScholarCrossref 18.Linkowski
PMendlewicz
JLeclercq
RBrasseur
MHubain
PGolstein
JCopinschi
GVan Cauter
E The 24-hour profile of adrenocorticotropin and cortisol in major depressive illness.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985;61429- 438
Google ScholarCrossref 19.Rubin
RTPoland
RELesser
IMWinston
RABlodgett
N Neuroendocrine aspects of primary endogenous depression, I: cortisol secretory dynamics in patients and matched controls.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44328- 336
Google ScholarCrossref 20.Carroll
BJFeinberg
MGreden
JFTarika
JAlbala
AAHaskett
RFJams
NKronfol
ZLohr
NSteiner
MDeVigne
JPYoung
EA A specific laboratory test for the diagnosis of melancholia: standardization, validation, and clinical utility.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;3815- 22
Google ScholarCrossref 21.Young
EAKotun
JHaskett
RFGrunhaus
LGreden
JFWatson
SJAkil
H Dissociation between pituitary and adrenal suppression to dexamethasone in depression.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50395- 403
Google ScholarCrossref 22.Lopez
JFChalmers
DTLittle
KYWatson
SJ Regulation of serotonin 1a, glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors in rat and human hippocampu: implications for the neurobiology of depression.
Biol Psychiatry. 1998;43547- 573
Google ScholarCrossref 23.Trapp
THolsboer
F Heterodimerization between mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors increases the functional diversity of corticosteroid action.
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1996;17145- 149
Google ScholarCrossref 24.Lopez
JFVázquez
DMChalmers
DTAkil
HWatson
SJ Regulation of 5-HT receptors and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis: implications for the neurobiology of suicide.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997;836106- 134
Google ScholarCrossref 25.de Kloet
ERVreugdenhil
EOitzl
MSJoels
M Brain corticosteroid receptor balance in health and disease.
Endocr Rev. 1998;19269- 301
Google Scholar 26.Joels
Mde Kloet
ER Mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors in the brain: implications for ion permeability and transmitter systems.
Prog Neurobiol. 1994;431- 36
Google ScholarCrossref 27.Kuroda
YWatanabe
YAlbeck
DSHastings
NBMcEwen
BS Effects of adrenalectomy and type I or type II glucocorticoid receptor activation on 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptor binding and 5-HT transporter mRNA expression in rat brain.
Brain Res. 1994;648157- 161
Google ScholarCrossref 28.Meijer
OCde Kloet
ER Corticosterone suppresses the expression of 5-HT1A receptor mRNA in rat dentate gyrus.
Eur J Pharmacol. 1994;266255- 261
Google ScholarCrossref 29.Karten
YJNair
SMvan Essen
LSibug
RJoels
M Long-term exposure to high corticosterone levels attenuates serotonin responses in rat hippocampal CA1 neurons.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;9613456- 13461
Google ScholarCrossref 30.Kuroda
YMikuni
MOgawa
TTakahashi
K Effect of ACTH, adrenalectomy and the combination treatment on the density of 5-HT2 receptor binding sites in neocortex of rat forebrain and 5-HT2 receptor-mediated wet-dog shake behaviors.
Psychopharmacology. 1992;10827- 32
Google ScholarCrossref 31.Kuroda
YMikuni
MNomura
NTakahashi
K Differential effect of subchronic dexamethasone treatment on serotonin-2 and β-adrenergic receptors in the rat cerebral cortex and hippocampus.
Neurosci Lett. 1993;155195- 198
Google ScholarCrossref 32.McKittrick
CRBlanchard
DCBlanchard
RJMcEwen
BSSakai
RR Serotonin receptor binding in a colony model of chronic social stress.
Biol Psychiatry. 1995;37383- 396
Google ScholarCrossref 33.Arango
VUnderwood
MDBoldrini
MTamir
HKassir
SAHsiung
SChen
JJMann
JJ Serotonin 1A receptors, serotonin transporter binding and serotonin transporter mRNA expression in the brainstem of depressed suicide victims.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;25892- 903
Google ScholarCrossref 34.Drevets
WCFrank
EPrice
JCKupfer
DJHolt
DGreer
PJHuang
YGautier
CMathis
C PET imaging of serotonin 1A receptor binding in depression.
Biol Psychiatry. 1999;461375- 1387
Google ScholarCrossref 35.Drevets
WCFrank
EPrice
JCKupfer
DJGreer
PJMathis
C Serotonin type-1A receptor imaging in depression.
Nucl Med Biol. 2000;27499- 507
Google ScholarCrossref 36.Arango
VErnsberger
PMarzuk
PMChen
JSTierney
HStanley
MReiss
DJMann
JJ Autoradiographic demonstration of increased serotonin 5-HT
2 and β-adrenergic receptor binding sites in the brain of suicide victims.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990;471038- 1047
Google ScholarCrossref 37.Hrdina
PDDemeter
EVu
TBSotonyi
PPalkovits
M 5-HT uptake sites and 5-HT
2 receptors in brain of antidepressant-free suicide victims/depressives: increase in 5-HT
2 sites in cortex and amygdala.
Brain Res. 1993;61437- 44
Google ScholarCrossref 38.Yates
MLeake
ACandy
JMFairbairn
AFMcKeith
IGFerrier
IN 5HT2 receptor changes in major depression.
Biol Psychiatry. 1990;27489- 496
Google ScholarCrossref 39.Blier
Pde Montigny
C Current advances and trends in the treatment of depression.
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1994;15220- 226
Google ScholarCrossref 40.Welner
SADe Montigny
CDesroches
JDesjardins
PSuranyi-Cadotte
BE Autoradiographic quantification of serotonin1A receptors in rat brain following antidepressant drug treatment.
Synapse. 1989;4347- 352
Google ScholarCrossref 41.Klimek
VZak-Knapik
JMackowiak
M Effects of repeated treatment with fluoxetine and citalopram, 5-HT uptake inhibitors, on 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptors in the rat brain.
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 1994;1963- 67
Google Scholar 42.Peroutka
SJSnyder
SH Regulation of serotonin2 (5-HT2) receptors labeled with [3H]spiroperidol by chronic treatment with the antidepressant amitriptyline.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1980;215582- 587
Google Scholar 43.Schreiber
RDe Vry
J Neuronal circuits involved in the anxiolytic effects of the 5-HT1A receptor agonists 8-OH-DPAT ipsapirone and buspirone in the rat.
Eur J Pharmacol. 1993;249341- 351
Google ScholarCrossref 44.Berendsen
HH Interactions between 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtypes: is a disturbed receptor balance contributing to the symptomatology of depression in humans?
Pharmacol Ther. 1995;6617- 37
Google ScholarCrossref 45.Borsini
F Balance between cortical 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptor function: hypothesis for a faster antidepressant action.
Pharmacol Res. 1994;301- 11
Google ScholarCrossref