Psychosocial Risk Factors Associated With Cyberbullying Among Adolescents: A Population-Based Study | Adolescent Medicine | JAMA Psychiatry | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.185.54. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Smith  PKMahdavi  JCarvalho  MFisher  SRussell  STippett  N Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils.  J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2008;49 (4) 376- 385PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Balding  J Young People in 2004: The Health-Related Behaviour Questionnaire Results for 40 430 Young People Between the Ages of 10 and 15.  Exeter, England: Schools Health Education Unit; 2005
3.
Ybarra  MLMitchell  KJ Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics.  J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2004;45 (7) 1308- 1316PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Ybarra  MLMitchell  KJWolak  JFinkelhor  D Examining characteristics and associated distress related to Internet harassment: findings from the Second Youth Internet Safety Survey.  Pediatrics 2006;118 (4) e1169- e1177PubMeddoi:10.1542/peds.2006-0815Google Scholar
5.
Ybarra  ML Linkages between depressive symptomatology and Internet harassment among young regular Internet users.  Cyberpsychol Behav 2004;7 (2) 247- 257PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Raskauskas  JStoltz  AD Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents.  Dev Psychol 2007;43 (3) 564- 575PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Smith  PMahdavi  JCarvalho  MTippett  N An Investigation Into Cyberbullying, Its Forms, Awareness and Impact, and the Relationship Between Age and Gender in Cyberbullying.  London, England: Department for Education and Skills; 2006. Research brief RBX03-06
8.
Olweus  D Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do.  Oxford, England: Blackwell; 1993
9.
Due  PHolstein  BELynch  JDiderichsen  FGabhain  SNScheidt  PCurrie  CHealth Behaviour in School-Aged Children Bullying Working Group, Bullying and symptoms among school-aged children: international comparative cross sectional study in 28 countries.  Eur J Public Health 2005;15 (2) 128- 132PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Rigby  K Peer victimization at school and the health of secondary school students.  Br J Educ Psychol 1999;69 (pt 1) 95- 104PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Nansel  TROverpeck  MDHaynie  DLRuan  WJScheidt  PC Relationships between bullying and violence among US youth.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003;157 (4) 348- 353PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Arseneault  LWalsh  ETrzesniewski  KNewcombe  RCaspi  AMoffitt  TE Bullying victimization uniquely contributes to adjustment problems in young children: a nationally representative cohort study.  Pediatrics 2006;118 (1) 130- 138PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Craig  WM The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children.  Pers Individ Dif 1998;24 (1) 123- 130doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00145-1Google Scholar
14.
Kumpulainen  KRäsänen  E Children involved in bullying at elementary school age: their psychiatric symptoms and deviance in adolescence: an epidemiological sample.  Child Abuse Negl 2000;24 (12) 1567- 1577PubMedGoogle Scholar
15.
Kim  YSLeventhal  BLKoh  YJHubbard  ABoyce  WT School bullying and youth violence: causes or consequences of psychopathologic behavior?  Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006;63 (9) 1035- 1041PubMedGoogle Scholar
16.
Gini  GPozzoli  T Association between bullying and psychosomatic problems: a meta-analysis.  Pediatrics 2009;123 (3) 1059- 1065PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Sourander  AJensen  PRønning  JANiemelä  SHelenius  HSillanmäki  LKumpulainen  KPiha  JTamminen  TMoilanen  IAlmqvist  F What is the early adulthood outcome of boys who bully or are bullied in childhood? the Finnish “From a Boy to a Man” study.  Pediatrics 2007;120 (2) 397- 404PubMedGoogle Scholar
18.
Sourander  AJensen  PRonning  JAElonheimo  HNiemelä  SHelenius  HKumpulainen  KPiha  JTamminen  TMoilanen  IAlmqvist  F Childhood bullies and victims and their risk of criminality in late adolescence: the Finnish From a Boy to a Man study.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161 (6) 546- 552PubMedGoogle Scholar
19.
Sourander  ARonning  JBrunstein Klomek  AGyllenberg  DKumpulainen  KNiemelä  SHelenius  HSillanmäki  LRistkari  TTamminen  TMoilanen  IPiha  JAlmqvist  F Childhood bullying behavior and later psychiatric hospital and psychopharmacological treatment: findings from the Finnish 1981 birth cohort study.  Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009;66 (9) 1005- 1012PubMedGoogle Scholar
20.
Klomek  ABSourander  AKumpulainen  KPiha  JTamminen  TMoilanen  IAlmqvist  FGould  MS Childhood bullying as a risk for later depression and suicidal ideation among Finnish males.  J Affect Disord 2008;109 (1-2) 47- 55PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
Klomek  ABSourander  ANiemelä  SKumpulainen  KPiha  JTamminen  TAlmqvist  FGould  MS Childhood bullying behaviors as a risk for suicide attempts and completed suicides: a population-based birth cohort study.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2009;48 (3) 254- 261PubMedGoogle Scholar
22.
Rønning  JASourander  AKumpulainen  KTamminen  TNiemelä  SMoilanen  IHelenius  HPiha  JAlmqvist  F Cross-informant agreement about bullying and victimization among eight-year-olds: whose information best predicts psychiatric caseness 10-15 years later?  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2009;44 (1) 15- 22PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Hinduja  SPatchin  JW Bullying Beyond the Schoolyard: Preventing and Responding to Cyberbullying.  Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; 2009
24.
Goodman  R The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note.  J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1997;38 (5) 581- 586PubMedGoogle Scholar
25.
Goodman  R The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden.  J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1999;40 (5) 791- 799PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Koskelainen  MSourander  AVauras  M Self-reported strengths and difficulties in a community sample of Finnish adolescents.  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001;10 (3) 180- 185PubMedGoogle Scholar
27.
Hosmer  DW  JrLemeshow  S Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data.  New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1999
28.
Hawker  DSJBoulton  MJ Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: a meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies.  J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2000;41 (4) 441- 455PubMedGoogle Scholar
29.
Finkelhor  DMitchell  KJWolak  J Online victimization: a report on the nation's youth, 2000. http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/publications/NC62.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2009
30.
Nansel  TRCraig  WOverpeck  MDSaluja  GRuan  WJHealth Behaviour in School-aged Children Bullying Analyses Working Group, Cross-national consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158 (8) 730- 736PubMedGoogle Scholar
31.
Kaltiala-Heino  RRimpela  MRantanen  PRimpela  A Bullying at school: an indicator of adolescents at risk for mental disorders.  J Adolesc 2000;23 (6) 661- 674PubMedGoogle Scholar
32.
Fekkes  MPijpers  FIMFredriks  AMVogels  TVerloove-Vanhorick  SP Do bullied children get ill, or do ill children get bullied? a prospective cohort study on the relationship between bullying and health-related symptoms.  Pediatrics 2006;117 (5) 1568- 1574PubMedGoogle Scholar
33.
Williams  KChambers  MLogan  SRobinson  D Association of common health symptoms with bullying in primary school children.  BMJ 1996;313 (7048) 17- 19PubMedGoogle Scholar
34.
Olweus  D Bullying at school: basic facts and an effective intervention programme.  Promot Educ 1994;1 (4) 27- 31, 48PubMedGoogle Scholar
Original Article
July 2010

Psychosocial Risk Factors Associated With Cyberbullying Among Adolescents: A Population-Based Study

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Departments of Child Psychiatry (Drs Sourander and Luntamo and Mss Ikonen, Lindroos, and Ristkari) and Biostatistics (Mr Helenius), Turku University, Turku, and Department of Child Psychiatry, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki (Dr Koskelainen), Finland; and Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York (Dr Brunstein Klomek).

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(7):720-728. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.79
Abstract

Context  To our knowledge, no population study examining psychosocial and psychiatric risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents exists.

Objective  To study cross-sectional associations between cyberbullying and psychiatric and psychosomatic problems among adolescents.

Design  Population-based cross-sectional study.

Setting  Finland.

Participants  The sample consists of 2215 Finnish adolescents aged 13 to 16 years with complete information about cyberbullying and cybervictimization.

Main Outcome Measures  Self-reports of cyberbullying and cybervictimization during the past 6 months.

Results  In the total sample, 4.8% were cybervictims only, 7.4% were cyberbullies only, and 5.4% were cyberbully-victims. Cybervictim-only status was associated with living in a family with other than 2 biological parents, perceived difficulties, emotional and peer problems, headache, recurrent abdominal pain, sleeping difficulties, and not feeling safe at school. Cyberbully-only status was associated with perceived difficulties, hyperactivity, conduct problems, low prosocial behavior, frequent smoking and drunkenness, headache, and not feeling safe at school. Cyberbully-victim status was associated with all of these risk factors. Among cybervictims, being cyberbullied by a same-sex or opposite-sex adult, by an unknown person, and by a group of people were associated with fear for safety, indicating possible trauma.

Conclusions  Both cyberbullying and cybervictimization are associated with psychiatric and psychosomatic problems. The most troubled are those who are both cyberbullies and cybervictims. This indicates the need for new strategies for cyberbullying prevention and intervention.

×