[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.207.240.35. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Original Article
April 4, 2011

Rewarding, Stimulant, and Sedative Alcohol Responses and Relationship to Future Binge Drinking

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience (Drs King and de Wit and Mr McNamara) and Surgery, Sections of Surgical Research and Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Dr Cao), The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(4):389-399. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.26
Abstract

Context  Excessive consumption of alcohol is a major problem in the United States and abroad. Despite many years of study, it is unclear why some individuals drink alcohol excessively while others do not. It has been postulated that either lower or greater acute responses to alcohol, or both, depending on the limb of the breath alcohol concentration curve, contribute to propensity for alcohol misuse.

Objective  To prospectively assess the relationship of acute alcohol responses to future binge drinking.

Design  Within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multidose laboratory alcohol challenge study with intensive follow-up. Each participant completed 3 randomized sessions examining responses to a high (0.8 g/kg) and low (0.4 g/kg) alcohol dose and placebo, followed by quarterly assessments for 2 years examining drinking behaviors and alcohol diagnoses.

Setting  Participants recruited from the community.

Participants  High-risk heavy social drinkers aged 21 to 35 years who habitually engage in weekly binge drinking (n = 104) and light drinker controls (n = 86).

Intervention  We conducted 570 laboratory sessions with a subsequent 99.1% follow-up (1506 of 1520).

Main Outcome Measures  Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale, Drug Effects Questionnaire, cortisol response, Timeline Follow-Back, Drinker Inventory of Consequences–Recent, and DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence.

Results  Alcohol produced greater stimulant and rewarding (liking and wanting) responses and lower sedative and cortisol responses in heavy vs light drinkers. Among the heavy drinkers, greater positive effects and lower sedative effects after alcohol consumption predicted increased binge drinking frequency during follow-up. In turn, greater frequency of binge drinking during follow-up was associated with greater likelihood of meeting diagnostic criteria for alcohol abuse and dependence.

Conclusions  The widely held low level response theory and differentiator model should be revised: in high-risk drinkers, stimulant and rewarding alcohol responses even at peak breath alcohol concentrations are important predictors of future alcohol problems.

Trial Registration:  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00961792

×