White Matter Differences Among Adolescents Reporting Psychotic Experiences: A Population-Based Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study | Adolescent Medicine | JAMA Psychiatry | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Figure 1.  Tractography Analysis Strategy
Tractography Analysis Strategy

Step 1, Initial tract identification mechanism using the fractional anisotropy (FA)–derived region of interest (ROI) (shown as a red sphere) and subsequent fiber bundles determined using constrained spherical deconvolution–based tractography. Step 2, Tract formation using AND gates (shown as green boxes). Each pair of gates acts as inclusion criteria where the fibers must pass through both gates to be selected, permitting specific tract selection (frontal inferior fronto-occipital [IFO], IFO body, uncinate fasciculus [UF], and superior longitudinal fasciculus [SLF]). Step 3, Tract resampling demonstrated on the IFO body. The length of tract between the inclusion gates is denoted as L and is subdivided into an equal number of sections (N), shown as green rectangular slabs partitioning the tract over its length. The number of slabs required is determined by L divided by voxel size (in millimeters).

Figure 2.  Along-Tract Analysis
Along-Tract Analysis

Results of the along-tract analysis for inferior fronto-occipital (IFO) frontal projections (A), IFO body (B), left superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) (C), and uncinate fasciculus (UF) (D). All 4 diffusion metrics are detailed for each resampled tract section. Uncorrected significance levels per section are shown pictorially, with the typical color scale of significance provided for values at P ≤ .05. Values at P > .05 are shown in white. Bonferroni correction was then applied at .05, divided by the number of sections times 3 diffusivity parameters. AD indicates axial diffusivity; MD, mean diffusivity; and RD, radial diffusivity.

Figure 3.  Whole-Brain Tract-Based Spatial Statistics Fractional Anisotropy (TBSS FA) Analysis
Whole-Brain Tract-Based Spatial Statistics Fractional Anisotropy (TBSS FA) Analysis

Significant between-group FA differences are shown and effect direction relative to controls, with red/yellow clusters indicating increased FA and blue clusters indicating decreased FA. Clusters have been enhanced for visualization purposes and presented on a standard T1-weighted image, including the mean skeletonized FA image shown in green.

Table 1.  Tract-Based Spatial Statistics White Matter (WM) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Differences
Tract-Based Spatial Statistics White Matter (WM) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Differences
Table 2.  Tract-Based Spatial Statistics White Matter (WM) Diffusivity Differences
Tract-Based Spatial Statistics White Matter (WM) Diffusivity Differences
Table 3.  Constrained Spherical Deconvolution, Derived Tract-Averaged Segment Measures
Constrained Spherical Deconvolution, Derived Tract-Averaged Segment Measures
Original Investigation
July 2015

White Matter Differences Among Adolescents Reporting Psychotic Experiences: A Population-Based Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin
  • 2Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Dublin, Ireland
  • 3Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • 4Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • 5Department of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(7):668-677. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0137

Importance  Abnormal brain connectivity is thought to have a key role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. White matter (WM) abnormalities have been reported in patients with schizophrenia and patients with prodromal syndromes. To our knowledge, no studies have yet reported on WM differences among adolescents who report psychotic experiences, a known vulnerability group for later severe psychopathology, including psychotic illness.

Objective  To study WM differences using diffusion-weighted imaging (whole-brain and tractography analyses) in adolescents who report psychotic experiences.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A population-based case-control study of 28 adolescents 13 to 16 years old who reported psychotic experiences and a matched sample of 28 adolescents who did not report psychotic experiences drawn from a sample of 212 young people recruited from primary schools in North Dublin and Kildare, Ireland. The study dates were 2008 to 2011.

Interventions  High-angular resolution diffusion-weighted imaging data were used to conduct whole-brain WM analysis using tract-based spatial statistics. Based on this exploratory analysis, a tractography-based approach with constrained spherical deconvolution was performed.

Results  Compared with control group participants, adolescents who reported psychotic experiences showed WM differences bilaterally in striatal regions in proximity to the putamen (increased fractional anisotropy, P = .01, false discovery rate corrected), and tractography identified significant WM differences bilaterally in the uncinate fasciculus (increased fractional anisotropy in the right [P = .001] and axial diffusivity in the left [P = .01] uncinate fasciculus, respectively). Similar patterns of WM differences between groups survived adjustment for other psychopathology, indicating some specificity for psychotic experiences. Exploratory along-tract analyses showed WM differences between groups in the frontal projections of the right inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (reduced radial diffusivity in approximately 32% of the tract segment [P ≤ .0001] and increased fractional anisotropy in approximately 16% of the tract segment [P ≤ .0009]).

Conclusions and Relevance  In a population-based study of adolescents reporting psychotic experiences, we found a number of WM differences in the region of the putamen located between the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus and the uncinate fasciculus and in the left parietal regions that include the fiber bundle of the superior longitudinal fasciculus. These findings suggest that subtle structural changes to WM microstructure are not merely a consequence of disorder but may index vulnerability to psychosis even at a very early age.


Abnormalities in connectivity have been proposed as a key feature of psychosis.1-4 Techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion-tensor imaging have shown widespread dysconnectivity, as indexed by decreased fractional anisotropy (FA) measures, a putative tensor-based measure of white matter (WM) integrity, in patients with schizophrenia, particularly in the frontotemporal connections.5-7 Attention has recently focused on the prodromal period, and frontotemporal connectivity abnormalities have also been reported in individuals with at-risk mental states.8-16 However, individuals with at-risk mental states are far along the psychosis continuum and are already often help seeking. The aim of the present study was to examine dysconnectivity in individuals at an earlier point on the psychosis continuum using a population-based sample of school-going adolescents who reported psychotic experiences.

In contrast to the low prevalence of psychotic disorder (approximately 0.5%-1%), studies17-22 have shown that psychotic experiences occur at a high prevalence in the community. A meta-analysis21 of all community-based studies of psychotic experiences demonstrated median prevalences of 17% among children between 9 and 12 years old and 7.5% among adolescents between 13 and 18 years old. Longitudinal studies have shown that psychotic experiences in childhood are associated not only with increased risk (7.4%) for psychotic disorders later in life20,23-26 but also a wide range of nonpsychotic psychiatric disorders,14,27,28 in particular severe psychopathology characterized by multimorbidity (ie, the presence of multiple co-occurring disorders) and suicidal behavior.29-31 Therefore, psychotic experiences in the population (an extended psychosis phenotype) represent an important marker of risk for severe mental disorders beyond simply an increased risk for psychotic disorder.

The objective of the present study was to investigate putative WM anomalies in adolescents who report psychotic experiences. Based on the literature, we hypothesized that WM abnormalities (specifically reduced FA in frontotemporal regions) would be present in nonclinical populations with psychotic experiences but that these differences would be more subtle than in clinical populations.

We used several innovative techniques. First, high-angular resolution diffusion-weighted imaging32,33 with constrained spherical deconvolution–based fiber tractography was used to provide a more accurate approach than diffusion-tensor imaging–based tractography for investigating subtle WM structure and connectivity differences.34-39 Second, tract segmentation approaches allowed us to investigate subtle differences along tracts, which were deemed necessary in a nonclinical population. Third, a range of diffusion metrics, including axial diffusivity (AD), radial diffusivity (RD), and mean diffusivity (MD), as well as FA, was used to provide a greater degree of information on the diffusion properties related to axonal packing and myelination.40,41


The study dates were 2008 to 2011. A sample of 212 young people between 11 and 13 years old was recruited from primary schools in North Dublin and Kildare, Ireland, as part of the Adolescent Brain Development Study.42 All 212 participants attended a diagnostic clinical interview with trained raters (I.K., S.R., M.H. and M.C.). For further details on the recruitment and interviewing, refer to Kelleher et al.42,43 Psychotic symptoms were assessed using the psychosis section of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (K-SADS).44 This schedule is a well-validated, semistructured research diagnostic interview for the assessment of current and lifetime DSM-IV Axis I psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents. The psychosis section contains questions designed to assess hallucinations and delusions. If any psychotic experience was reported, a full written account detailing the reported experience was taken. A consensus committee comprising an adult psychiatrist (M.C.), a child and adolescent psychiatrist (M.H.), and a psychologist (I.K.) met after the interviews to discuss the transcripts and determine whether any experiences elicited could be considered definite psychotic experiences or not. Factors associated with the experience, such as timing, content, frequency, attribution, severity, and distress, were taken into account in classifying experiences as definite or possible. The most common symptom reported was auditory verbal hallucinations and was present in more than 90% of those reporting symptoms.43

A subsample of 100 participants with no contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging agreed to take part in a subsequent neuroimaging study that took place 1 to 3 years after the original interview. Of the 100 individuals imaged, 28 adolescents 13 to 16 years old met criteria for the presence of a definite psychotic experience. These individuals were classified as the psychotic experiences group (PE group). From the remaining 72 participants, a group of 28 adolescents who had not reported psychotic experiences at the initial interview were chosen to match the PE group for age (at the time of imaging), sex, and handedness; these individuals formed the control group. All control subjects were screened before imaging to exclude newly emerging psychotic symptoms. We did not include individuals with possible psychotic experiences in this analysis.

Ethical approval was obtained for the experimental protocol for this study from the Medical Research Ethics Committee, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, and the School of Psychology, Trinity College, Dublin. Written parental consent and participant assent were obtained before the study.

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Acquisition

Whole-brain high-angular resolution diffusion-weighted imaging data with 61 gradient directions were acquired for each participant on a 3.0-T magnetic resonance system (Intera Achieva; Philips) equipped with an 8-channel head coil. All imaging was performed on the same magnetic resonance system in Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Dublin.

Diffusion Data Analyses

A concise description of the imaging methods used is given below, and in-depth detailed descriptions of the methods are provided in the supplementary online material (eMethods in the Supplement). Preprocessing and tractography analyses were performed using a diffusion magnetic resonance imaging toolbox (ExploreDTI; http://www.Exploredti.com45).

Global WM Analysis

Tract-based spatial statistics46,47 (part of the FSL toolbox; http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl48) was used to conduct whole-brain voxelwise analysis for the FA, MD, AD, and RD images independently. Voxelwise between-group analyses were performed using nonparametric rank order Brunner-Munzel tests49 within a software package (MRIcron; http://www.mccauslandcenter.sc.edu/mricro/mricron/index.html50), with false discovery rate51 correction applied at P = .01.

WM Tract Visualization and Selection

Significant FA differences were used as initial seed masks for deterministic tractography modeled using constrained spherical deconvolution to identify the WM tracts in proximity to these regions of interest.52 Initial visualization of all tracts through each region of interest (eMethods in the Supplement) was used and subsequently followed by a tract isolation strategy using inclusion AND with exclusion NOT gates, resulting in the identification and delineation of the inferior fronto-occipital (IFO) tract (including the frontal projections) bilaterally, the left superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), and the uncinate fasciculus (UF) bilaterally (Figure 1).

A population atlas–based tractography approach41,53 using robust inclusion AND and exclusion NOT gates was used to accurately select the WM tract segments for investigation. The IFO was divided into 2 segments. Segment 1 comprised the main fibers traversing from the anterior extension (commencing at the approximate position where the frontal arc of the UF merges with the IFO bundle) to the posterior extension of the IFO. Segment 2 comprised the frontal IFO projections (see step 2 of Figure 1). To our knowledge, this is the first time that the IFO has been analyzed in this fashion, but similar methods have been used previously to subdivide other tracts such as the cingulum, corpus callosum, and corticospinal tract.34,54,55

Tract-Averaged Segment Analysis

For each tract segment, FA, MD, AD, and RD values were obtained, which were calculated for the entire segment of the tract.

Along-Tract Analysis

Tract resampling was performed to assess WM variations over the length of fiber tract bundle.56-59 Each tract of interest was subsampled into equal sections (N) (ie, the mean fiber bundle length divided by the voxel size) (Figure 1, step 3). Parameter values were extracted at each of these evenly spaced sections, allowing pointwise correspondence across individuals (eMethods in the Supplement).

Statistical Analysis

All extracted diffusion metrics were systematically inspected to remove outliers before the statistical analyses using a software program (SPSS, version 21; IBM). Analysis of covariance (with age and sex as covariates) was used to compare between-group differences per metric. Bonferroni correction was applied at .05, divided by the number of sections times 3 diffusivity parameters (eigen values λ1, λ2, and λ3). Uncorrected significance levels per section are shown graphically in Figure 2.

Adjustment for Psychopathology

Comorbid DSM-IV mental disorders were more prevalent among the PE group than among controls. To assess whether PEs predicted neuroarchitectural differences beyond those predicted simply by the presence of a mental disorder, we conducted a subanalysis that included only the participants with mental disorders.


There were no significant differences between those imaged and not imaged. The groups were similar in age (χ23,211 = 0.51, P = .91), sex (χ21,210 = 1.25, P = .26), handedness (χ21,157 = 0.18, P = .66), presence of psychotic experiences (χ21,211 = 0.83, P = .36), socioeconomic status (χ21,165 = 1.76, P = .18), personal psychiatric history (χ21,208 = .003, P = .95), and family psychiatric history (χ21,206 = 1.55, P = .21).

There were no significant differences between the PE group vs the control group in age (mean [SD] age, 13.7 [1.4] vs 13.6 [1.3] years; P = .80), sex (36% vs 39% were male, P = .80), or handedness (26 vs 27 were right handed, P = .60). There were significant differences between the groups in the presence of comorbid DSM-IV disorders (17 vs 7, P < .05).

Global Voxelwise WM Analyses (Whole-Brain Tract-Based Spatial Statistics)
Fractional Anisotropy

The PE group had increased FA (P = .01, false discovery rate corrected) in the following 3 regions: (1) right putamen WM, (2) left putamen WM (including the IFO and UF), and (3) left SLF extending to the temporal area. The PE group had reduced FA in the left SLF, UF, and IFO. These 4 regions of interest were used as seed regions for the initial tract identification (Table 1 and Figure 3), as described in the WM Tract Visualization and Selection subsection of the Tractography section in the Methods.

Diffusivity Measurements
Mean Diffusivity

The PE group showed significantly greater MD (P = .01, false discovery rate corrected) in the WM of the left hemisphere, including the SLF. These results are summarized in Table 2.

Axial Diffusivity

The PE group showed significantly increased AD bilaterally in the putamen WM, including the IFO and UF tracts. Significant reductions in AD were found in the left posterior thalamic radiation, including the IFO and the inferior longitudinal fasciculus, as well as in the left cerebral peduncle, including the corticospinal tract and thalamic radiation (Table 2).

Radial Diffusivity

The PE group showed RD reductions bilaterally in the putamen WM, including the IFO and UF (Table 2). There was a convergence of effects for FA, AD, and RD localized bilaterally in the putamen WM, including the IFO and UF.

Tractography Analyses
Tract-Averaged Segment Analysis

Table 3 summarizes the results for the tract-averaged analyses. The PE group showed significant increases in FA in the right UF (P = .001) and in AD in the left UF (P = .012). Strong trends (just above Bonferroni correction) were identified for increased FA in the left UF (P = .022) and reduced RD bilaterally in the UF (P = .040 left and P = .031 right) and the frontal section of the IFO (P = .031 left and P = .023 right) in the PE group.

Along-Tract Analyses

Results for the along-tract analysis for the frontal IFO, IFO body, left SLF, and UF are shown in Figure 2. Plots for each diffusion metric over the length of each tract segment are detailed in the eResults and eFigure 1 in the Supplement. There were significant differences in the PE group in the frontal IFO segment (detailed below and in Figure 2A). The UF and all other tract segments did not show any significant along-tract variations (Figure 2B-D).

Frontal IFO Segment

Analyses of the right IFO frontal projections revealed increased FA and AD, as well as reduced MD and RD, for the PE group, with more pronounced effects in the most posterior sections. Specifically, 5 of 19 sections revealed significant FA increases (P ≤ .005) in the PE group, 3 of which (amounting to approximately 16%) survived robust Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons at P ≤ .0009 (0.05 of 19 sections times 3 diffusivity parameters). In the PE group, RD was also reduced in 13 sections (P ≤ .05), 6 of which (approximately 32% of the segment) survived Bonferroni correction with P ≤ .0001 to P < .000002. Increased AD was identified in 4 sections, 3 of which survived Bonferroni correction at P ≤ .0005. The MD variations along the tract segment were weaker (P = .023 to P = .001) and more evenly dispersed throughout the tract (Figure 2A).

Adjusting for Psychopathology

Seventeen of the PE group and 7 of the control group had a DSM-IV lifetime mental disorder based on the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children interview. All analyses were repeated, and the whole-brain tract-based spatial statistics findings of increased FA bilaterally within the putamen and left SLF remained significant (eTable 1 in the Supplement). The along-tract analyses also revealed persistent patterns of difference along the tracts but to a lesser extent, probably due to reduced power (eTable 2 and eFigure 2 in the Supplement).


In this population-based sample of adolescents reporting psychotic experiences, we found 3 WM microstructural differences. First was increased FA bilaterally in the putamen region located between the IFO and the UF, as well as in the left parietal regions, including the trajectory of the SLF. Differences in AD and RD were also identified within these areas. Second was bilateral significant differences in the UF for tract-averaged measures and strong trends in RD, approaching significance in the right frontal projections of the IFO. Third was significant FA increases in the right frontal projections of the IFO identified by tract resampling.

The merits of using both tract-averaged and tract-resampled measures were evident because the former revealed widespread alterations along tracts (as identified in the UF), while the latter captured more subtle localized along-tract variations56,57 in the IFO frontal projections. These findings were largely unchanged even when confined only to individuals with mental disorders (with vs without psychotic experiences), demonstrating that these differences are likely to relate to the experience of psychotic symptoms as opposed to simply indexing psychopathology.

Previous Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Findings in Schizophrenia and Psychosis

Contrary to our hypothesis, we found increased FA and AD and reduced MD and RD in adolescents with psychotic symptoms, which is in contrast to the typical FA reductions and MD increases reported by many investigators in both first-episode and chronic schizophrenia.5,9,11,13,60-62 However, our findings are not without precedent. Although FA is globally decreased in schizophrenia, specific tracts showing increased FA have been reported that appear to be related to auditory hallucinations. For instance, increased FA in the SLF has been reported in patients who report hallucinations compared with those who do not.63,64 Mulert and Scarr65 reported increased FA in a subgroup of patients with conversing voices in fiber tracts connecting homotropic auditory pathways via the corpus callosum. There are also several reports (including a meta-analysis) showing increased FA in the arcuate fasciculus in patients with auditory hallucinations compared with controls.66-69 The findings of increased FA in genetic high-risk, sibling, and ultra–high-risk samples58,70-72 suggest that increased FA may reflect a vulnerability to developing psychosis. Our findings add to the literature in this area by demonstrating that increased FA in frontotemporal and frontoparietal projections is related to the propensity to experience auditory hallucinations in young people who do not have a psychotic disorder. Although patients with chronic schizophrenia have a combination of increased and decreased FA (connectivity) in specific brain networks, our findings suggest that increased FA may be more relevant in terms of a vulnerability marker. However, careful interpretation of FA is needed because there is not a simple linear relationship between WM fiber integrity and FA values.66

Interpretation of the Findings

The IFO is thought to have a role in the transmission of auditory and visual information between fronto-occipital regions.73 One could speculate that structural alterations along these pathways may partly explain the neurocognitive processing speed deficits that have been demonstrated in individuals reporting psychotic experiences.74,75

Dopamine regulation disruption in the putamen has been reported in schizophrenia.76-80 Increased dopamine synthesis has been demonstrated in healthy siblings of patients with schizophrenia in this region.70,81 Our findings of increased FA bilaterally in the putamen might suggest that early WM microstructural insults in this structure could have a role in increasing vulnerability to psychosis.

What Is the Meaning of Increased FA?

The use of high-angular resolution diffusion-weighted imaging–based constrained spherical deconvolution tractography82-85 with the associated improved representation of crossing fibers86-88 could potentially sensitize the analysis to capture FA increases.88,89 Our findings support previous research showing that increased FA and AD, as well as a corresponding decrease in RD, are indicative of reduced WM distribution complexity in the brain.88,90

The directionality of diffusion metrics, such as FA, must be considered carefully in the context of developmental periods and diffusion-weighted imaging techniques. Normative developmental maturation processes in the brain are associated with WM increases in FA and AD, as well as with corresponding decreases in MD and RD.41,91-93 We found that these differences were of much greater magnitude in the young people who have experienced psychotic symptoms, perhaps reflecting an atypical process of brain maturation accompanied by disruption in WM myelination. Indeed, the results provide further evidence that WM alterations reported in schizophrenia are not merely a consequence of the disease but precede illness onset and may therefore be used as potential markers for early detection. One could speculate that increased FA may indicate loss of crossing fibers, which may be more prominent in one direction initially (giving rise to increased FA) before affecting WM more globally with the onset of psychosis.

Strengths and Limitations

The strengths of our study are several. First is the use of a well-controlled, population-based sample. Second is the inclusion of detailed clinical assessments and the verification of interview-derived symptoms by consensus discussion. Third is the utilization of advanced imaging techniques that provide a more accurate representation of multiple fiber orientation and are in closer agreement with known neuroanatomy than its diffusion-tensor imaging-equivalent representation. Fourth is our use of highly sensitive tract-resampling techniques to detect subtle significant WM differences.

There are also some limitations. First, although increased FA could indicate crossing fibers, these crossing fibers were not directly measured in this study because the methods for such analyses are not yet fully validated.94,95 In the absence of any standardized alternative diffusion measures, we used diffusion-tensor imaging–derived indexes (FA, MD, AD, and RD) applied to our constrained spherical deconvolution–defined tracts.39 Second, the sample sizes in the present study are not large (although on par with ultra–high-risk samples),11 but we believe that the unique nature of the cohort and the careful clinical evaluation and control selection compensate for the modest sample sizes. Our findings withstood correction for multiple testing but will need replication in other at-risk groups using similar methods. Third, our findings relate to a specific snapshot of a developmental period of mid-adolescence. Careful consideration is needed when formulating direct comparisons to the findings from studies of older adolescents and young adults in ultra–high-risk and schizophrenia studies. Fourth, the tract selection strategy used does not investigate all well-known tracts; therefore, effects may extend beyond those identified in this study. Fifth, specific correlational analyses were not carried out between WM changes and measures of severity of symptoms in view of the modest sample size and the fact that this analysis only included young people who were considered to have met criteria for definite psychotic symptoms as rated by a panel of clinicians, and those with possible symptoms (ie, less severe) were excluded, thereby reducing the variance between individuals in the PE group on measures of symptom severity.


In conclusion, we stress the need for longitudinal clinical imaging studies to track young people with psychotic symptoms from adolescence through the developmental period to early adulthood to observe the changes in WM as vulnerability progresses (or not) to disorder. Such studies would clarify the mechanisms of the WM differences observed in this study.

Back to top
Article Information

Submitted for Publication: July 25, 2014; final revision received January 20, 2015; accepted January 22, 2015.

Corresponding Author: Erik O’Hanlon, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Education and Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland (erikohanlon@rcsi.ie).

Published Online: April 29, 2015. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0137.

Author Contributions: Drs O’Hanlon and Cannon had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Cannon.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: O’Hanlon, Leemans, Kelleher, Roddy, Harley, Hoscheit, Tiedt, Tabish, McGettigan, Frodl, Cannon.

Drafting of the manuscript: O’Hanlon, Kelleher, Clarke, Coughlan, Cannon.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: O’Hanlon, Leemans, Kelleher, Clarke, Coughlan, Harley, Amico, Hoscheit, Tiedt, Tabish, McGettigan, Frodl, Cannon.

Statistical analysis: O’Hanlon, Kelleher, Clarke, Cannon.

Obtained funding: Cannon.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Leemans, Harley, Frodl, Cannon.

Study supervision: Frodl, Cannon.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was funded by grants HRA/PHS/2-012/28 (Dr O’Hanlon) and HRA/PHS/2010/4 (Drs Roddy, Harley, and Amico) from the Health Research Board, Ireland. Dr Leemans was supported by grant 639.072.411 from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. Dr Kelleher was supported in part by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme under grant HEALTH-F2-2010-241909 9 (European Network of National Schizophrenia Networks Studying Gene-Environment Interaction). Ms Coughlan was supported by Interdisciplinary Capacity Enhancement Award ICE/2012/11 from the Health Research Board, Ireland (to Drs Clarke and Cannon). Mr Hoscheit was supported by the Science Foundation Ireland’s Summer Programme for Undergraduate Research on Neuroscience. Dr Tiedt was funded by a Health Research Board, Summer Studentship. Dr Tabish was supported by a Royal College of Surgeons Summer Studentship. Dr Cannon was supported by Clinician Scientist Award CSA/2004/1 from the Health Research Board, Ireland, which also supported Dr Kelleher.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Additional Contributions: Sojo Joseph (Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience radiographer) and Trinity College High Performance Computing assisted with the study. We acknowledge the use of the facilities of the Clinical Research Centre in the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Education and Research Centre. We would like to thank all the young participants and their parents for giving their time to this study.

Friston  KJ.  The disconnection hypothesis.  Schizophr Res. 1998;30(2):115-125.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Stephan  KE, Friston  KJ, Frith  CD.  Dysconnection in schizophrenia: from abnormal synaptic plasticity to failures of self-monitoring.  Schizophr Bull. 2009;35(3):509-527.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Fornito  A, Zalesky  A, Pantelis  C, Bullmore  ET.  Schizophrenia, neuroimaging and connectomics.  Neuroimage. 2012;62(4):2296-2314.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
van den Heuvel  MP, Sporns  O.  Rich-club organization of the human connectome.  J Neurosci. 2011;31(44):15775-15786.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Ellison-Wright  I, Bullmore  E.  Meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging studies in schizophrenia.  Schizophr Res. 2009;108(1-3):3-10.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kanaan  RA, Kim  JS, Kaufmann  WE, Pearlson  GD, Barker  GJ, McGuire  PK.  Diffusion tensor imaging in schizophrenia.  Biol Psychiatry. 2005;58(12):921-929.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kubicki  M, Westin  CF, McCarley  RW, Shenton  ME.  The application of DTI to investigate white matter abnormalities in schizophrenia.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1064:134-148.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Fusar-Poli  P, Bonoldi  I, Yung  AR,  et al.  Predicting psychosis: meta-analysis of transition outcomes in individuals at high clinical risk.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(3):220-229.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Karlsgodt  KH, Jacobson  SC, Seal  M, Fusar-Poli  P.  The relationship of developmental changes in white matter to the onset of psychosis.  Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(4):422-433.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Karlsgodt  KH, Niendam  TA, Bearden  CE, Cannon  TD.  White matter integrity and prediction of social and role functioning in subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis.  Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66(6):562-569.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Peters  BD, Blaas  J, de Haan  L.  Diffusion tensor imaging in the early phase of schizophrenia: what have we learned?  J Psychiatr Res. 2010;44(15):993-1004.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Peters  BD, Schmitz  N, Dingemans  PM,  et al.  Preliminary evidence for reduced frontal white matter integrity in subjects at ultra-high-risk for psychosis.  Schizophr Res. 2009;111(1-3):192-193.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Samartzis  L, Dima  D, Fusar-Poli  P, Kyriakopoulos  M.  White matter alterations in early stages of schizophrenia: a systematic review of diffusion tensor imaging studies.  J Neuroimaging. 2014;24(2):101-110.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Scott  J, Martin  G, Welham  J,  et al.  Psychopathology during childhood and adolescence predicts delusional-like experiences in adults: a 21-year birth cohort study.  Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166(5):567-574.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Cullen  AE, De Brito  SA, Gregory  SL,  et al.  Temporal lobe volume abnormalities precede the prodrome: a study of children presenting antecedents of schizophrenia.  Schizophr Bull. 2013;39(6):1318-1327.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Cannon  TD, Cadenhead  K, Cornblatt  B,  et al.  Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: a multisite longitudinal study in North America.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(1):28-37.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Laurens  KR, Hobbs  MJ, Sunderland  M, Green  MJ, Mould  GL.  Psychotic-like experiences in a community sample of 8000 children aged 9 to 11 years: an item response theory analysis.  Psychol Med. 2012;42(7):1495-1506.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Yung  AR, Nelson  B, Baker  K, Buckby  JA, Baksheev  G, Cosgrave  EM.  Psychotic-like experiences in a community sample of adolescents: implications for the continuum model of psychosis and prediction of schizophrenia.  Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009;43(2):118-128.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Scott  J, Martin  G, Bor  W, Sawyer  M, Clark  J, McGrath  J.  The prevalence and correlates of hallucinations in Australian adolescents: results from a national survey.  Schizophr Res. 2009;107(2-3):179-185.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Linscott  RJ, van Os  J.  An updated and conservative systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence on psychotic experiences in children and adults: on the pathway from proneness to persistence to dimensional expression across mental disorders.  Psychol Med. 2013;43(6):1133-1149.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kelleher  I, Connor  D, Clarke  MC, Devlin  N, Harley  M, Cannon  M.  Prevalence of psychotic symptoms in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies.  Psychol Med. 2012;42(9):1857-1863.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kelleher  I, Keeley  H, Corcoran  P,  et al.  Clinicopathological significance of psychotic experiences in non-psychotic young people: evidence from four population-based studies.  Br J Psychiatry. 2012;201(1):26-32.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Poulton  R, Caspi  A, Moffitt  TE, Cannon  M, Murray  R, Harrington  H.  Children’s self-reported psychotic symptoms and adult schizophreniform disorder: a 15-year longitudinal study.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(11):1053-1058.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Welham  J, Scott  J, Williams  G,  et al.  Emotional and behavioural antecedents of young adults who screen positive for non-affective psychosis: a 21-year birth cohort study.  Psychol Med. 2009;39(4):625-634.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kaymaz  N, Drukker  M, Lieb  R,  et al.  Do subthreshold psychotic experiences predict clinical outcomes in unselected non–help-seeking population-based samples? a systematic review and meta-analysis, enriched with new results.  Psychol Med. 2012;42(11):2239-2253.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Fisher  HL, Caspi  A, Poulton  R,  et al.  Specificity of childhood psychotic symptoms for predicting schizophrenia by 38 years of age: a birth cohort study.  Psychol Med. 2013;43(10):2077-2086.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Yung  AR, Buckby  JA, Cosgrave  EM,  et al.  Association between psychotic experiences and depression in a clinical sample over 6 months.  Schizophr Res. 2007;91(1-3):246-253.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Wigman  JT, van Nierop  M, Vollebergh  WA,  et al.  Evidence that psychotic symptoms are prevalent in disorders of anxiety and depression, impacting on illness onset, risk, and severity: implications for diagnosis and ultra–high risk research.  Schizophr Bull. 2012;38(2):247-257.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kelleher  I, Corcoran  P, Keeley  H,  et al.  Psychotic symptoms and population risk for suicide attempt: a prospective cohort study.  JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(9):940-948.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kelleher  I, Devlin  N, Wigman  JTW,  et al.  Psychotic experiences in an adolescent mental health clinic sample: implications for suicidality, multimorbidity and functioning.  Psychol Med. 2014;44(8):1615-1624.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kelleher  I, Lynch  F, Harley  M,  et al.  Psychotic symptoms in adolescence index risk for suicidal behavior: findings from 2 population-based case-control clinical interview studies.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(12):1277-1283.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Jones  DK, Knösche  TR, Turner  R.  White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: the do’s and don’ts of diffusion MRI.  Neuroimage. 2013;73:239-254.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Jones  DK, Leemans  A.  Diffusion tensor imaging.  Methods Mol Biol. 2011;711:127-144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Emsell  L, Leemans  A, Langan  C,  et al.  Limbic and callosal white matter changes in euthymic bipolar I disorder: an advanced diffusion magnetic resonance imaging tractography study.  Biol Psychiatry. 2013;73(2):194-201.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
McGrath  J, Johnson  K, O’Hanlon  E, Garavan  H, Gallagher  L, Leemans  A.  White matter and visuospatial processing in autism: a constrained spherical deconvolution tractography study.  Autism Res.2013;6(5):307-319. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
McGrath  J, Johnson  K, O’Hanlon  E, Garavan  H, Leemans  A, Gallagher  L.  Abnormal functional connectivity during visuospatial processing is associated with disrupted organisation of white matter in autism.  Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:434.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Metzler-Baddeley  C, Hunt  S, Jones  DK, Leemans  A, Aggleton  JP, O’Sullivan  MJ.  Temporal association tracts and the breakdown of episodic memory in mild cognitive impairment.  Neurology. 2012;79(23):2233-2240.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Reijmer  YD, Brundel  M, de Bresser  J, Kappelle  LJ, Leemans  A, Biessels  GJ; Utrecht Vascular Cognitive Impairment Study Group.  Microstructural white matter abnormalities and cognitive functioning in type 2 diabetes: a diffusion tensor imaging study.  Diabetes Care. 2013;36(1):137-144.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Reijmer  YD, Leemans  A, Heringa  SM,  et al; Vascular Cognitive Impairment Study Group.  Improved sensitivity to cerebral white matter abnormalities in Alzheimer’s disease with spherical deconvolution based tractography.  PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44074. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044074.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Beaulieu  C.  The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system: a technical review.  NMR Biomed. 2002;15(7-8):435-455.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Lebel  C, Beaulieu  C.  Longitudinal development of human brain wiring continues from childhood into adulthood.  J Neurosci. 2011;31(30):10937-10947.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kelleher  I, Murtagh  A, Molloy  C,  et al.  Identification and characterization of prodromal risk syndromes in young adolescents in the community: a population-based clinical interview study.  Schizophr Bull. 2012;38(2):239-246.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kelleher  I, Harley  M, Murtagh  A, Cannon  M.  Are screening instruments valid for psychotic-like experiences? a validation study of screening questions for psychotic-like experiences using in-depth clinical interview.  Schizophr Bull. 2011;37(2):362-369.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kaufman  J, Birmaher  B, Brent  D,  et al.  Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children–Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36(7):980-988.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Leemans  A, Jeurissen  B, Sijbers  J, Jones  DK.  ExploreDTI: a graphical toolbox for processing, analyzing, and visualizing diffusion MR data. In: Proceedings from the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; April 18-24, 2009; Honolulu, HI.
Smith  SM, Jenkinson  M, Johansen-Berg  H,  et al.  Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data.  Neuroimage. 2006;31(4):1487-1505.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Bach  M, Laun  FB, Leemans  A,  et al.  Methodological considerations on tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS).  Neuroimage. 2014;100:358-369.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Smith  SM, Jenkinson  M, Woolrich  MW,  et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.  Neuroimage. 2004;23(suppl 1):S208-S219.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Brunner  E, Munzel  U.  The nonparametric Behrens-Fisher problem: asymptotic theory and a small-sample approximation.  Biom J. 2000;42(1):17-25.Google ScholarCrossref
Rorden  C, Karnath  HO, Bonilha  L.  Improving lesion-symptom mapping.  J Cogn Neurosci. 2007;19(7):1081-1088.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Genovese  CR, Lazar  NA, Nichols  T.  Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate.  Neuroimage. 2002;15(4):870-878.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Jeurissen  B, Leemans  A, Jones  DK, Tournier  JD, Sijbers  J.  Probabilistic fiber tracking using the residual bootstrap with constrained spherical deconvolution.  Hum Brain Mapp. 2011;32(3):461-479.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Van Hecke  W, Sijbers  J, D’Agostino  E,  et al.  On the construction of an inter-subject diffusion tensor magnetic resonance atlas of the healthy human brain.  Neuroimage. 2008;43(1):69-80.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Jones  DK, Christiansen  KF, Chapman  RJ, Aggleton  JP.  Distinct subdivisions of the cingulum bundle revealed by diffusion MRI fibre tracking: implications for neuropsychological investigations.  Neuropsychologia. 2013;51(1):67-78.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Szczepankiewicz  F, Lätt  J, Wirestam  R,  et al.  Variability in diffusion kurtosis imaging: impact on study design, statistical power and interpretation.  Neuroimage. 2013;76:145-154.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Colby  JB, Soderberg  L, Lebel  C, Dinov  ID, Thompson  PM, Sowell  ER.  Along-tract statistics allow for enhanced tractography analysis.  Neuroimage. 2012;59(4):3227-3242.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Mandl  RC, Rais  M, van Baal  GC,  et al.  Altered white matter connectivity in never-medicated patients with schizophrenia.  Hum Brain Mapp. 2013;34(9):2353-2365.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Goghari  VM, Billiet  T, Sunaert  S, Emsell  L.  A diffusion tensor imaging family study of the fornix in schizophrenia.  Schizophr Res. 2014;159(2-3):435-440.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Surova  Y, Szczepankiewicz  F, Lätt  J,  et al.  Assessment of global and regional diffusion changes along white matter tracts in parkinsonian disorders by MR tractography.  PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66022. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066022.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hazlett  EA, Goldstein  KE, Kolaitis  JC.  A review of structural MRI and diffusion tensor imaging in schizotypal personality disorder.  Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2012;14(1):70-78.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kubicki  M, McCarley  R, Westin  CF,  et al.  A review of diffusion tensor imaging studies in schizophrenia.  J Psychiatr Res. 2007;41(1-2):15-30.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kyriakopoulos  M, Frangou  S.  Recent diffusion tensor imaging findings in early stages of schizophrenia.  Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009;22(2):168-176.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Seok  JH, Park  HJ, Chun  JW,  et al.  White matter abnormalities associated with auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia: a combined study of voxel-based analyses of diffusion tensor imaging and structural magnetic resonance imaging.  Psychiatry Res. 2007;156(2):93-104.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Shergill  SS, Kanaan  RA, Chitnis  XA,  et al.  A diffusion tensor imaging study of fasciculi in schizophrenia.  Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(3):467-473.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Mulert  C, Scarr  E.  Editorial: new treatment strategies in schizophrenia beyond dopamine: glutamatergic neurotransmission and more.  Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13(8):1474-1475.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Alba-Ferrara  LM, de Erausquin  GA.  What does anisotropy measure? insights from increased and decreased anisotropy in selective fiber tracts in schizophrenia.  Front Integr Neurosci. 2013;7:9.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Geoffroy  PA, Houenou  J, Duhamel  A,  et al.  The arcuate fasciculus in auditory-verbal hallucinations: a meta-analysis of diffusion-tensor-imaging studies.  Schizophr Res. 2014;159(1):234-237.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hubl  D, Koenig  T, Strik  W,  et al.  Pathways that make voices: white matter changes in auditory hallucinations.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61(7):658-668.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Rotarska-Jagiela  A, Oertel-Knoechel  V, DeMartino  F,  et al.  Anatomical brain connectivity and positive symptoms of schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor imaging study.  Psychiatry Res. 2009;174(1):9-16.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hoptman  MJ, Nierenberg  J, Bertisch  HC,  et al.  A DTI study of white matter microstructure in individuals at high genetic risk for schizophrenia.  Schizophr Res. 2008;106(2-3):115-124.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Bloemen  OJ, de Koning  MB, Schmitz  N,  et al.  White-matter markers for psychosis in a prospective ultra–high-risk cohort.  Psychol Med. 2010;40(8):1297-1304.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Boos  HB, Mandl  RC, van Haren  NE,  et al.  Tract-based diffusion tensor imaging in patients with schizophrenia and their non-psychotic siblings.  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;23(4):295-304.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Schmahmann  JD, Pandya  DN.  Fiber Pathways of the Brain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006.
Kelleher  I, Clarke  MC, Rawdon  C, Murphy  J, Cannon  M.  Neurocognition in the extended psychosis phenotype: performance of a community sample of adolescents with psychotic symptoms on the MATRICS neurocognitive battery.  Schizophr Bull. 2013;39(5):1018-1026.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kelleher  I, Murtagh  A, Clarke  MC, Murphy  J, Rawdon  C, Cannon  M.  Neurocognitive performance of a community-based sample of young people at putative ultra high risk for psychosis: support for the processing speed hypothesis.  Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2013;18(1-2):9-25.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Fusar-Poli  P, Howes  OD, Allen  P,  et al.  Abnormal prefrontal activation directly related to pre-synaptic striatal dopamine dysfunction in people at clinical high risk for psychosis.  Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16(1):67-75.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Fusar-Poli  P, Meyer-Lindenberg  A.  Striatal presynaptic dopamine in schizophrenia, part I: meta-analysis of dopamine active transporter (DAT) density.  Schizophr Bull. 2013;39(1):22-32.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Fusar-Poli  P, Meyer-Lindenberg  A.  Striatal presynaptic dopamine in schizophrenia, part II: meta-analysis of [18F/11C]-DOPA PET studies.  Schizophr Bull. 2013;39(1):33-42.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Lyon  GJ, Abi-Dargham  A, Moore  H, Lieberman  JA, Javitch  JA, Sulzer  D.  Presynaptic regulation of dopamine transmission in schizophrenia.  Schizophr Bull. 2011;37(1):108-117.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Howes  OD, Montgomery  AJ, Asselin  MC,  et al.  Elevated striatal dopamine function linked to prodromal signs of schizophrenia.  Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(1):13-20.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Huttunen  J, Heinimaa  M, Svirskis  T,  et al.  Striatal dopamine synthesis in first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia.  Biol Psychiatry. 2008;63(1):114-117.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Tournier  JD, Calamante  F, Connelly  A.  Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution.  Neuroimage. 2007;35(4):1459-1472.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Tournier  JD, Calamante  F, Gadian  DG, Connelly  A.  Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution.  Neuroimage. 2004;23(3):1176-1185.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Tournier  JD, Mori  S, Leemans  A.  Diffusion tensor imaging and beyond.  Magn Reson Med. 2011;65(6):1532-1556.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Tournier  JD, Yeh  CH, Calamante  F, Cho  KH, Connelly  A, Lin  CP.  Resolving crossing fibres using constrained spherical deconvolution: validation using diffusion-weighted imaging phantom data.  Neuroimage. 2008;42(2):617-625.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Alexander  DC, Barker  GJ, Arridge  SR.  Detection and modeling of non-Gaussian apparent diffusion coefficient profiles in human brain data.  Magn Reson Med. 2002;48(2):331-340.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Jeurissen  B, Leemans  A, Tournier  JD, Jones  DK, Sijbers  J.  Investigating the prevalence of complex fiber configurations in white matter tissue with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging.  Hum Brain Mapp. 2013;34(11):2747-2766.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Vos  SB, Jones  DK, Jeurissen  B, Viergever  MA, Leemans  A.  The influence of complex white matter architecture on the mean diffusivity in diffusion tensor MRI of the human brain.  Neuroimage. 2012;59(3):2208-2216.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Douaud  G, Jbabdi  S, Behrens  TE,  et al.  DTI measures in crossing-fibre areas: increased diffusion anisotropy reveals early white matter alteration in MCI and mild Alzheimer’s disease.  Neuroimage. 2011;55(3):880-890.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Wheeler-Kingshott  CA, Cercignani  M.  About “axial” and “radial” diffusivities.  Magn Reson Med. 2009;61(5):1255-1260.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Giorgio  A, Watkins  KE, Chadwick  M,  et al.  Longitudinal changes in grey and white matter during adolescence.  Neuroimage. 2010;49(1):94-103.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Giorgio  A, Watkins  KE, Douaud  G,  et al.  Changes in white matter microstructure during adolescence.  Neuroimage. 2008;39(1):52-61.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Schmithorst  VJ, Yuan  W.  White matter development during adolescence as shown by diffusion MRI.  Brain Cogn. 2010;72(1):16-25.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Dell’Acqua  F, Simmons  A, Williams  SC, Catani  M.  Can spherical deconvolution provide more information than fiber orientations? hindrance modulated orientational anisotropy, a true-tract specific index to characterize white matter diffusion.  Hum Brain Mapp. 2013;34(10):2464-2483.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Raffelt  D, Tournier  JD, Rose  S,  et al.  Apparent fibre density: a novel measure for the analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images.  Neuroimage. 2012;59(4):3976-3994.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref