[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Figure.  Combined Pattern of Physical Activity and Television Viewing Time and Poor Cognitive Performance
Combined Pattern of Physical Activity and Television Viewing Time and Poor Cognitive Performance

Models were adjusted for age, race, sex, educational level, smoking, alcohol use, body mass index, and hypertension. The most active (reference) group had a long-term pattern of moderate to high physical activity and low to moderate television viewing time; the intermediate group had a long-term pattern of moderate to high physical activity and high television viewing time or long-term pattern of low physical activity and low to moderate television viewing time; and the least active group had a long-term pattern of low physical activity and high television viewing time. DSST indicates Digit Symbol Substitution Test; RAVLT, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test; circles, odds ratios; and error bars, 95% CI.

Table 1.  Baseline Characteristics of CARDIA Participants by Long-term Pattern of Physical Activity
Baseline Characteristics of CARDIA Participants by Long-term Pattern of Physical Activity
Table 2.  Long-term Patterns of Physical Activity and Poor Cognitive Performance at Midlife
Long-term Patterns of Physical Activity and Poor Cognitive Performance at Midlife
Table 3.  Long-term Patterns of Television Viewing Time and Poor Cognitive Performance at Midlife
Long-term Patterns of Television Viewing Time and Poor Cognitive Performance at Midlife
1.
Voss  MW, Nagamatsu  LS, Liu-Ambrose  T, Kramer  AF.  Exercise, brain, and cognition across the life span.  J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011;111(5):1505-1513.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Singh  A, Uijtdewilligen  L, Twisk  JWR, van Mechelen  W, Chinapaw  MJM.  Physical activity and performance at school: a systematic review of the literature including a methodological quality assessment.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(1):49-55.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Buchman  AS, Boyle  PA, Yu  L, Shah  RC, Wilson  RS, Bennett  DA.  Total daily physical activity and the risk of AD and cognitive decline in older adults.  Neurology. 2012;78(17):1323-1329.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Ng  SW, Popkin  BM.  Time use and physical activity: a shift away from movement across the globe.  Obes Rev. 2012;13(8):659-680.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Gordon-Larsen  P, Nelson  MC, Popkin  BM.  Longitudinal physical activity and sedentary behavior trends: adolescence to adulthood.  Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(4):277-283.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Zick  CD, Smith  KR, Brown  BB, Fan  JX, Kowaleski-Jones  L.  Physical activity during the transition from adolescence to adulthood.  J Phys Act Health. 2007;4(2):125-137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Kwan  MY, Cairney  J, Faulkner  GE, Pullenayegum  EE.  Physical activity and other health-risk behaviors during the transition into early adulthood: a longitudinal cohort study.  Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(1):14-20.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Caspersen  CJ, Pereira  MA, Curran  KM.  Changes in physical activity patterns in the United States, by sex and cross-sectional age.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9):1601-1609.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Larouche  R, Laurencelle  L, Shephard  RJ, Trudeau  F.  Life transitions in the waning of physical activity from childhood to adult life in the Trois-Rivières study.  J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(4):516-524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Telama  R.  Tracking of physical activity from childhood to adulthood: a review.  Obes Facts. 2009;2(3):187-195.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Dik  M, Deeg  DJH, Visser  M, Jonker  C.  Early life physical activity and cognition at old age.  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003;25(5):643-653.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Middleton  LE, Barnes  DE, Lui  L-Y, Yaffe  K.  Physical activity over the life course and its association with cognitive performance and impairment in old age.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(7):1322-1326.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Zhu  N, Jacobs  DR  Jr, Schreiner  PJ,  et al.  Cardiorespiratory fitness and cognitive function in middle age: the CARDIA Study.  Neurology. 2014;82(15):1339-1346.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Chau  JY, Merom  D, Grunseit  A, Rissel  C, Bauman  AE, van der Ploeg  HP.  Temporal trends in non-occupational sedentary behaviours from Australian Time Use Surveys 1992, 1997 and 2006.  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(1):76.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Duncan  MJ, Vandelanotte  C, Caperchione  C, Hanley  C, Mummery  WK.  Temporal trends in and relationships between screen time, physical activity, overweight and obesity.  BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):1060.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Barnes  DE, Blackwell  T, Stone  KL, Goldman  SE, Hillier  T, Yaffe  K; Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.  Cognition in older women: the importance of daytime movement.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(9):1658-1664.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Wang  S, Luo  X, Barnes  D, Sano  M, Yaffe  K.  Physical activity and risk of cognitive impairment among oldest-old women.  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014; 22(11):1149-1157. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Kesse-Guyot  E, Charreire  H, Andreeva  VA,  et al.  Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of different sedentary behaviors with cognitive performance in older adults.  PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47831.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Hughes  GH, Cutter  G, Donahue  R,  et al.  Recruitment in the Coronary Artery Disease Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.  Control Clin Trials. 1987;8(4)(suppl):68S-73S.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Friedman  GD, Cutter  GR, Donahue  RP,  et al.  CARDIA: study design, recruitment, and some characteristics of the examined subjects.  J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(11):1105-1116.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Sidney  S, Jacobs  DR  Jr, Haskell  WL,  et al.  Comparison of two methods of assessing physical activity in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.  Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133(12):1231-1245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
22.
Jacobs  DR, Hahn  LP, Haskell  WL, Pirie  P, Sidney  S.  Validity and reliability of short physical activity history: CARDIA and the Minnesota Heart Health Program.  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 1989;9(11):448-459.Google ScholarCrossref
23.
Hankinson  AL, Daviglus  ML, Bouchard  C,  et al.  Maintaining a high physical activity level over 20 years and weight gain.  JAMA. 2010;304(23):2603-2610.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Gabriel  KP, Sidney  S, Jacobs  DR  Jr,  et al.  Convergent validity of a brief self-reported physical activity questionnaire.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(8):1570-1577.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Wechsler  D.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–III (WAIS-III). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1997.
26.
Stroop  JR.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.  J Exp Psychol. 1935;18(6):643.Google ScholarCrossref
27.
MacLeod  CM.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.  Psychol Bull. 1991;109(2):163-203.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Rosenberg  SJ, Ryan  JJ, Prifitera  A.  Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test performance of patients with and without memory impairment.  J Clin Psychol. 1984;40(3):785-787.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Schmidt  M.  Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test: A Handbook. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services; 1996.
30.
Kamboh  MI, Ferrell  RE, Kottke  B.  Genetic studies of human apolipoproteins. V. A novel rapid procedure to screen apolipoprotein E polymorphism.  J Lipid Res. 1988;29(11):1535-1543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
31.
Howard  BV, Gidding  SS, Liu  K.  Association of apolipoprotein E phenotype with plasma lipoproteins in African-American and white young adults: the CARDIA Study.  Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148(9):859-868.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Singh-Manoux  A, Hillsdon  M, Brunner  E, Marmot  M.  Effects of physical activity on cognitive functioning in middle age: evidence from the Whitehall II prospective cohort study.  Am J Public Health. 2005;95(12):2252-2258.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
van Gelder  BM, Tijhuis  MAR, Kalmijn  S, Giampaoli  S, Nissinen  A, Kromhout  D.  Physical activity in relation to cognitive decline in elderly men: the FINE Study.  Neurology. 2004;63(12):2316-2321.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Richards  M, Hardy  R, Wadsworth  MEJ.  Does active leisure protect cognition? evidence from a national birth cohort.  Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(4):785-792.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Tierney  MC, Moineddin  R, Morra  A, Manson  J, Blake  J.  Intensity of recreational physical activity throughout life and later life cognitive functioning in women.  J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;22(4):1331-1338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
36.
Dregan  A, Gulliford  MC.  Leisure-time physical activity over the life course and cognitive functioning in late mid-adult years: a cohort-based investigation.  Psychol Med. 2013;43(11):2447-2458.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Verburgh  L, Konigs  M, Scherder  EJ, Oosterlaan  J.  Physical exercise and executive functions in preadolescent children, adolescents and young adults: a meta-analysis.  Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(12):973-979.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Stroth  S, Hille  K, Spitzer  M, Reinhardt  R.  Aerobic endurance exercise benefits memory and affect in young adults.  Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19(2):223-243.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Chang  YK, Tsai  CL, Hung  TM, So  EC, Chen  FT, Etnier  JL.  Effects of acute exercise on executive function: a study with a Tower of London Task.  J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2011;33(6):847-865.PubMedGoogle Scholar
40.
Sibley  BA, Etnier  JL, Le Masurier  GC.  Effects of an acute bout of exercise on cognitive aspects of Stroop performance.  J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2006;28(3):285-299.Google Scholar
41.
Hillman  CH, Motl  RW, Pontifex  MB,  et al.  Physical activity and cognitive function in a cross-section of younger and older community-dwelling individuals.  Health Psychol. 2006;25(6):678-687.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Kamijo  K, Takeda  Y.  Regular physical activity improves executive function during task switching in young adults.  Int J Psychophysiol. 2010;75(3):304-311.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Åberg  MAI, Pedersen  NL, Torén  K,  et al.  Cardiovascular fitness is associated with cognition in young adulthood.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(49):20906-20911.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Ploughman  M.  Exercise is brain food: the effects of physical activity on cognitive function.  Dev Neurorehabil. 2008;11(3):236-240.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Ahlskog  JE, Geda  YE, Graff-Radford  NR, Petersen  RC.  Physical exercise as a preventive or disease-modifying treatment of dementia and brain aging.  Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(9):876-884.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
Erickson  KI, Raji  CA, Lopez  OL,  et al.  Physical activity predicts gray matter volume in late adulthood: the Cardiovascular Health Study.  Neurology. 2010;75(16):1415-1422.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
47.
Rovio  S, Spulber  G, Nieminen  LJ,  et al.  The effect of midlife physical activity on structural brain changes in the elderly.  Neurobiol Aging. 2010;31(11):1927-1936.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
48.
Brown  BM, Peiffer  JJ, Taddei  K,  et al.  Physical activity and amyloid-β plasma and brain levels: results from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle Study of Ageing.  Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18(8):875-881.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
49.
Liang  KY, Mintun  MA, Fagan  AM,  et al.  Exercise and Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers in cognitively normal older adults.  Ann Neurol. 2010;68(3):311-318.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
50.
Brown  BM, Peiffer  JJ, Martins  RN.  Multiple effects of physical activity on molecular and cognitive signs of brain aging: can exercise slow neurodegeneration and delay Alzheimer’s disease?  Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18(8):864-874.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
51.
Inoue  S, Sugiyama  T, Takamiya  T, Oka  K, Owen  N, Shimomitsu  T.  Television viewing time is associated with overweight/obesity among older adults, independent of meeting physical activity and health guidelines.  J Epidemiol. 2012;22(1):50-56.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
52.
Grøntved  A, Hu  FB.  Television viewing and risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis.  JAMA. 2011;305(23):2448-2455.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
53.
Stamatakis  E, Hamer  M, Mishra  GD.  Early adulthood television viewing and cardiometabolic risk profiles in early middle age: results from a population, prospective cohort study.  Diabetologia. 2012;55(2):311-320.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
54.
Wang  JYJ, Zhou  DHD, Li  J,  et al.  Leisure activity and risk of cognitive impairment: the Chongqing Aging Study.  Neurology. 2006;66(6):911-913.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
55.
Lindstrom  HA, Fritsch  T, Petot  G,  et al.  The relationships between television viewing in midlife and the development of Alzheimer’s disease in a case-control study.  Brain Cogn. 2005;58(2):157-165.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
56.
Geda  YE, Topazian  HM, Roberts  LA,  et al.  Engaging in cognitive activities, aging, and mild cognitive impairment: a population-based study.  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;23(2):149-154.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
57.
Fogel  J, Carlson  MCPHD.  Soap operas and talk shows on television are associated with poorer cognition in older women.  South Med J. 2006;99(3):226-233.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
58.
Tremblay  MS, Colley  RC, Saunders  TJ, Healy  GN, Owen  N.  Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle.  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010;35(6):725-740.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
59.
Allison  MA, Jensky  NE, Marshall  SJ, Bertoni  AG, Cushman  M.  Sedentary behavior and adiposity-associated inflammation: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.  Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(1):8-13.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
60.
Pinto Pereira  SM, Ki  M, Power  C.  Sedentary behaviour and biomarkers for cardiovascular disease and diabetes in mid-life: the role of television-viewing and sitting at work.  PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31132.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
61.
Costigan  SA, Barnett  L, Plotnikoff  RC, Lubans  DR.  The health indicators associated with screen-based sedentary behavior among adolescent girls: a systematic review.  J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(4):382-392.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
62.
Teychenne  M, Ball  K, Salmon  J.  Sedentary behavior and depression among adults: a review.  Int J Behav Med. 2010;17(4):246-254.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
63.
Sisson  SB, Shay  CM, Broyles  ST, Leyva  M.  Television-viewing time and dietary quality among U.S. children and adults.  Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(2):196-200.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
64.
Loprinzi  PD, Herod  SM, Cardinal  BJ, Noakes  TD.  Physical activity and the brain: a review of this dynamic, bi-directional relationship.  Brain Res. 2013;1539:95-104.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
65.
Daly  M, McMinn  D, Allan  JL.  A bidirectional relationship between physical activity and executive function in older adults.  Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:1044.PubMedGoogle Scholar
66.
Craigie  AM, Lake  AA, Kelly  SA, Adamson  AJ, Mathers  JC.  Tracking of obesity-related behaviours from childhood to adulthood: a systematic review.  Maturitas. 2011;70(3):266-284.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
January 2016

Effect of Early Adult Patterns of Physical Activity and Television Viewing on Midlife Cognitive Function

Author Affiliations
  • 1Northern California Institute for Research and Education, San Francisco
  • 2Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
  • 3Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
  • 4Laboratory of Epidemiology, Demography, and Biometry, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Maryland
  • 5Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland
  • 6Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco
  • 7San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(1):73-79. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2468
Abstract

Importance  Sedentary behaviors and physical inactivity are not only increasing worldwide but also are critical risk factors for adverse health outcomes. Yet, few studies have examined the effects of sedentary behavior on cognition or the long-term role of either behavior in early to middle adulthood.

Objective  To investigate the association between 25-year patterns of television viewing and physical activity and midlife cognition.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Prospective study of 3247 adults (black and white races; aged 18-30 years) enrolled in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study (March 25, 1985, to August 31, 2011). Data analysis was performed June 1, 2014, through April 15, 2015.

Main Outcomes and Measures  We assessed television viewing and physical activity at repeated visits (≥3 assessments) over 25 years using a validated questionnaire. A 25-year pattern of high television viewing was defined as watching TV above the upper baseline quartile (>3 hours/d) for more than two-thirds of the visits, and a 25-year pattern of low physical activity was defined as activity levels below the lower, sex-specific baseline quartile for more than two-thirds of the of the visits. We evaluated cognitive function at year 25 using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Stroop test, and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test.

Results  At baseline, the mean (SD) age of the 3247 study participants was 25.1 (3.6) years, 1836 (56.5%) were female, 1771 (54.5%) were white, and 3015 (92.9%) had completed at least high school. Compared with participants with low television viewing, those with high television viewing during 25 years (353 of 3247 [10.9%]) were more likely to have poor cognitive performance (<1 SD below the race-specific mean) on the DSST and Stroop test, with findings reported as adjusted odds ratio (95% CI): DSST, 1.64 (1.21-2.23) and Stroop test, 1.56 (1.13-2.14), but not the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, adjusted for age, race, sex, educational level, smoking, alcohol use, body mass index, and hypertension. Low physical activity during 25 years in 528 of 3247 participants (16.3%) was significantly associated with poor performance on the DSST, 1.47 (1.14-1.90). Compared with participants with low television viewing and high physical activity, the odds of poor performance were almost 2 times higher for adults with both high television viewing and low physical activity in 107 of 3247 (3.3%) (DSST, 1.95 [1.19-3.22], and Stroop test, 2.20 [1.36-3.56]).

Conclusions and Relevance  High television viewing and low physical activity in early adulthood were associated with worse midlife executive function and processing speed. This is one of the first studies to demonstrate that these risk behaviors may be critical targets for prevention of cognitive aging even before middle age.

Introduction

Increasing observational evidence and results from randomized clinical trials provide support for the beneficial effects of physical activity on cognitive function.1-3 However, global surveillance data suggest that overall levels of physical activity are declining,4 and the percentage of adolescents meeting recommended guidelines for physical activity is low, with even more failing to maintain these levels in adulthood.5,6 Over the life course, levels of physical activity tend to peak in childhood with large declines occurring during early adulthood in conjunction with major life transitions, such as entrance into the workforce and parenthood.6-9 Although early adulthood is a critical period for establishing life-long physical activity habits,10 few studies have investigated the association between physical activity in early adulthood and cognitive function later in life.11-13

Coupled with the increasing prevalence of sedentary or screen-based activities, such as watching television, these trends are of particular concern for upcoming generations of young people.14,15 In middle-aged and older adults, low levels of physical activity and high sedentary behavior are associated with cognitive impairment and dementia,16-18 but the long-term risks associated with these lifestyle behaviors require further investigation. In particular, the longitudinal association of television viewing with cognitive function is not well defined. Understanding the effects of these modifiable risk factors across the life course could be crucial for the development of effective population-based strategies for optimal cognitive aging.

The objective of this study was to examine the association between long-term patterns of physical activity and television viewing time during young adulthood with cognitive function in midlife. We hypothesized that patterns of low physical activity and high television viewing time will be associated with worse cognitive impairment at midlife.

Methods
Study Population

Young adults (aged 18-30 years) were recruited from population-based samples of 4 US cities (Birmingham, Alabama; Chicago, Illinois; Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Oakland, California) and enrolled in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. The study was conducted from March 25,1985, to August 31, 2011. Between 1985 and 1986, the baseline examination (year 0) was completed for 5115 participants. Follow-up examinations were completed every 2 to 5 years over 25 years: 1987-1988 (year 2), 1990-1991 (year 5), 1992-1993 (year 7), 1995-1996 (year 10), 2000-2001 (year 15), 2005-2006 (year 20), and 2010-2011 (year 25). Study protocols were reviewed by institutional review boards at each study site as well as the CARDIA coordinating center at the University of Alabama, Birmingham, and at the University of California, San Francisco. At each examination, participants provided written informed consent. Participants received reimbursement for travel and parking and nominal compensation for participation in the in-person examinations (only). Further details of study recruitment and design are available elsewhere.19,20

Of the 5115 participants, 3499 completed the year 25 visit. To assess long-term patterns of physical activity and television viewing time, we included participants with at least 3 assessments of physical activity, 3 assessments of television viewing time, and a cognitive assessment at year 25. The final analytic cohort included 3247 participants. Participants not included in the analytic cohort had a lower educational level and were more likely to be black, male, and smokers and have diabetes mellitus (P < .05).

Physical Activity

At baseline and each follow-up visit, the Physical Activity History Questionnaire, which provides a reliable measure of habitual physical activity,21,22 was used to assess participation in 13 types of vigorous-intensity (running or jogging; racquet sports; bicycling; swimming; exercise or dance class; job lifting, carrying, or digging; shoveling or lifting during leisure; and strenuous sports) and moderate-intensity (nonstrenuous sports, walking and hiking, golfing and bowling, home exercises or calisthenics, and home maintenance or gardening) physical activities in the past 12 months. Based on the duration of participation (2-5 hours/week) and intensity level (3-8 metabolic equivalents) of each activity, a total activity score was calculated as measured in exercise units. Further details on the questionnaire and scoring have been published.22-24 Previous CARDIA analysis24 indicated that a cut point of 250 exercise units has 97.1% specificity and 70.4% sensitivity for meeting recommended guidelines of 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week. A long-term pattern of low physical activity over 25 years was defined as reporting levels below the bottom, sex-specific quartile (males, 280 exercise units, and females, 148 exercise units) of baseline physical activity levels for more than two-thirds of the visits. Participants not meeting these criteria were categorized as having long-term patterns of moderate to high physical activity. A long-term pattern of very low physical activity over 25 years was defined as reporting activity levels of less than 50 exercise units for more than two-thirds of the visits.

Television Viewing Time

At years 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25, participants were asked the average number of hours per day spent watching television in the past 12 months. A long-term pattern of high television viewing time over 25 years was defined as reporting activity levels within the top quartile of the year 5 (baseline) visit (>3 hours/day) for more than two-thirds of the visits. All other participants were categorized as having a low to moderate pattern of television viewing time.

Physical Activity and Television Viewing Time

Based on patterns of physical activity and television viewing time, a categorical variable was created to examine the combined effects of both behaviors. Participants were categorized into 3 groups: (1) most active (reference), including moderate to high physical activity and low to moderate television viewing time; (2) intermediate, including moderate to high physical activity and high television viewing time or low physical activity and low to moderate television viewing time; and (3) least active, including low physical activity and high television viewing time.

Cognitive Function Assessment

At year 25, trained interviewers administered a battery of 3 cognitive tests: the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), which assesses processing speed and executive function (higher scores indicating better cognitive function)25; the Stroop test, which assesses executive function (an interference score was calculated with lower scores indicating better function)26,27; and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), which assesses verbal memory (the delayed score was used with higher scores indicating better function).28,29 We defined low cognitive performance as a race-specific score that was 1 SD worse than the mean.

Covariates

We assessed baseline demographic characteristics, cigarette smoking, and alcohol use using self-reports. At baseline, height and weight were measured, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Hypertension at baseline was defined as systolic blood pressure of 140 mm Hg or higher, diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher, or receiving antihypertensive medication. Diabetes mellitus at baseline was defined as fasting plasma glucose levels of 126 mg/dL or higher (to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0555) or use of diabetes medications. Isoelectric focusing and immunoblotting techniques were used to determine the apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4) phenotype from year 7 blood samples.30,31

Statistical Analysis

Baseline characteristics were compared by patterns of physical activity and television viewing using unpaired, 2-tailed t tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and χ2 tests as appropriate. We used logistic regression to determine the association between patterns of physical activity, television viewing, and a combination of the 2 during young adulthood with poor cognitive performance in middle age. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, race, sex, educational level, smoking, BMI, and hypertension. In addition, we assessed interactions with race, sex, obesity, and ApoE4 phenotype, as well as between physical activity and television viewing. We also evaluated associations between patterns of activity and cognitive performance in linear models. The level of significance was set at P < .05. SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc) was used for all analyses. Data analysis was performed June 1, 2014, through April 15, 2015.

Results

At baseline (year 0), the mean (SD) age of the CARDIA participants was 25.1 (3.6) years, 1836 (56.5%) were female, 1771 (54.5%) were white, and 3015 (92.9%) had completed at least high school. A total of 528 (16.3%) participants met the criteria for a long-term pattern of low physical activity and were more likely to be black (314 [59.5%]) compared with those reporting moderate to high physical activity (1162 [42.7%]; P < .001). Participants with low physical activity were more likely to have hypertension (25 [4.7%]; P < .001) and had a slightly lower educational level (mean [SD], 13.7 [2.2]; P < .001) and drank less alcohol (10.7 [21.8]; P = .001) (Table 1).

Compared with participants with moderate to high long-term patterns of physical activity, those with low physical activity were more likely to have poor cognitive performance at midlife on the DSST (low, 21.6% vs moderate to high, 14.5%; odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% CI, 1.28-2.04) and Stroop test (low, 16.2% vs moderate to high, 12.3%; OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06-1.78) but not on the RAVLT (low, 22.1% vs moderate to high, 19.5%; OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.93-1.47) (Table 2). After adjusting for age, race, sex, educational level, smoking, alcohol use, BMI, and hypertension, the association between low physical activity and poor cognitive performance remained significant for the DSST (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.14-1.90). The results of linear models were consistent with cognitive impairment models.

In a sensitivity analysis, we further adjusted for ApoE4, which did not significantly alter the results. In addition, there were no significant interactions with race, sex, obesity, or ApoE4 for the association between physical activity patterns and poor cognitive performance (P > .05 for all). We also investigated patterns of very low or almost no physical activity. Only 53 of the participants (1.6%) reported very low patterns of physical activity, and after multivariable adjustment (reported as OR [95% CI]), associations with the DSST (2.43 [1.23-4.79]), Stroop test (2.02 [1.05-3.89]), and RAVLT (2.01 [1.05-3.83]) were significant.

A total of 353 participants (10.9%) met the criteria for a long-term pattern of high television viewing. This high level was associated with poor cognitive performance at year 25 on all cognitive tests (Table 3). In unadjusted models, the odds of poor cognitive performance were between 1.5 and 2 times higher for participants reporting high levels of television viewing over time compared with the low to moderate viewers, reported as OR (95% CI) (DSST: high, 27.4% vs low to moderate, 14.3%; OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.75-2.93; Stroop test: high, 21.4% vs low to moderate, 12.0%; OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.52-2.66; and RAVLT: high, 27.1% vs low to moderate, 19.1%; OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.23-2.04). After multivariable adjustment for age, race, sex, educational level, smoking, alcohol use, BMI, and hypertension, the association was attenuated but significant for poor performance on the DSST and Stroop test (DSST: OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.21-2.23; Stroop test: OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.13-2.14). However, high television viewing time was no longer associated with poor cognitive performance on the RAVLT (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.86-1.53). Further adjustment for ApoE4 did not significantly alter the association with the DSST, but the effect size with the Stroop test increased slightly (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.29-2.53). There were no consistently significant interactions with race, sex, obesity, or ApoE4 for the association between television viewing time and cognitive performance. In models that also adjusted for long-term physical activity patterns, effect sizes for both physical activity and television viewing time were only slightly attenuated, and similar patterns were observed. The interaction between television viewing and physical activity was not significant.

When physical activity patterns and television viewing time were combined, 2473 participants (76.2%) reported the most active patterns of moderate to high physical activity and low to moderate television viewing, 667 individuals (20.5%) reported intermediate patterns with low physical activity and low to moderate television viewing or moderate to high physical activity and high television viewing time, and 107 participants (3.3%) reported the least active patterns of low physical activity and high television viewing time. In adjusted models (results reported as OR [95% CI]), participants with the least active patterns of physical activity and television viewing were more likely to have poor cognitive performance on both the DSST and Stroop test (DSST, 1.95 [1.19-3.22]; Stroop test, 2.20 [1.36-3.56]) (Figure) compared with those who reported the most active patterns. The association with the RAVLT was elevated but not significant (1.39 [0.87-2.22]). Participants reporting intermediate patterns also had elevated odds of poor cognitive performance on the DSST (1.57 [1.23-2.00]).

Discussion

In this biracial cohort followed for 25 years, we found that low levels of physical activity and high levels of television viewing time during young to mid-adulthood were associated with worse cognitive performance in midlife. In particular, these behaviors were associated with slower processing speed and worse executive function but not with verbal memory. Participants with the least active patterns of behavior (ie, both low physical activity and high television viewing time) were the most likely to have poor cognitive function.

Previous longitudinal investigations of physical activity in midlife and late life support our findings.13,32,33 These earlier studies indicated that low physical activity levels are associated with poor cognitive performance and cognitive decline in older adults. Results from the slightly older British 1946 birth cohort34 suggest that greater leisure time physical activity in adults during their mid-30s contributes to less cognitive decline during middle age (43-53 years). A few other studies11,12 have also investigated the effects of physical activity participation at earlier ages, but these relied on retrospective measures. In one investigation,11 regular early life physical activity was associated with better information processing speed in men but not women; in the second study,12 older women who reported more physical activity during adolescence were also less likely to develop cognitive impairment based on a global test of cognition. Similar results were reported in a small retrospective study35 of postmenopausal women in whom long-term, moderate physical activity beginning in early adulthood was associated with better cognitive function in late life. In CARDIA,13 change in cardiorespiratory fitness in young adulthood was also associated with psychomotor speed at midlife, and a more recent prospective study36 examined the association between leisure time physical activity throughout life and midlife cognitive function. Although the measure of leisure time activity was not standardized and patterns of activity over time were not assessed, the study found that participation in leisure time physical activity (defined as participation in sports as a child or adolescent and regular sport or exercise as an adult) for 4 or more days each week was associated with better memory and executive function compared with no leisure time physical activity.

Studies of physical activity and cognitive function among adolescents and young adults have focused mainly on the acute benefits for cognitive function.37 In small trials38-40 that have been limited to short time periods, physical activity among young adults improved visuospatial memory, executive function, and processing speed. In cross-sectional, observational studies,41-43 regular physical activity was also associated with better cognitive function in young adults, but the long-term effects of physical activity on cognitive function during this life stage are unclear.37

Physical activity during young adulthood may preserve cognitive function and contribute to cognitive reserve by increasing neurogenesis as well as synaptic plasticity, particularly in regions associated with executive function and processing speed, but physical activity may also affect other risk factors for cognitive impairment, including cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory factors, and depressive symptoms.44,45 Observational studies46-49 in middle and late age have also reported correlations between physical activity and higher measures of total brain and gray matter volume as well as lower β-amyloid levels in the brain. Although some studies50 have reported differences in the association of physical activity with Alzheimer disease risk and amyloid deposition by ApoE4 status, we did not find an interaction between physical activity patterns and ApoE4 phenotype. It is possible that physical activity affects cognition through non–ApoE4-associated pathways, or there may be differences in this association by age.

To our knowledge, this study is also one of the first to report an adverse association between increased television viewing time in early adulthood and midlife cognitive performance. Increasing evidence suggests that sedentary behavior, such as television viewing, is associated with cardiovascular disease, obesity, and mortality in adults,51,52 and television viewing in young adulthood has also been associated with worse cardiometabolic risk factors in middle age.53 In addition, television viewing in middle-aged and older adults has been identified as a risk factor for cognitive impairment,54-56 but the content and degree of cognitive engagement may be an important aspect of this behavior to consider.18,57

The effects of television watching on cognitive function may involve several complex pathways. Physiologic studies58-60 suggest that sedentary behaviors, such as television viewing, adversely affect metabolic function by increasing blood pressure as well as lipid and glucose levels. Television viewing may also be associated with different cognitive and social patterns, depression, and poor dietary patterns.61-63 The association of physical activity and sedentary behaviors with cognitive function may also be bidirectional,64 and reverse causation could contribute to the observed associations.65 Even though we did not perform baseline cognitive testing, given the young age of the participants at study enrollment and the fact that they remained in the study for 25 years, it is unlikely that they had clinically significant cognitive deficits.

The CARDIA Study is a well-characterized, large, diverse cohort with follow-up data on measures of physical activity from more than 20 years. It is one of the first studies to examine the longitudinal association between physical activity and sedentary behaviors and cognitive function in a younger cohort with carefully repeated measures. However, there are a few limitations to consider. Although the retention of CARDIA participants was high over the 25 years of the study, it is possible that there was some selection bias owing to loss to follow-up. Both physical activity and television viewing were self-reported. In addition, we were limited to examining the effects of television viewing and were unable to consider cognitively stimulating sedentary activities, such as video games. Although we assessed the domains of executive function, processing speed, and verbal memory, not all cognitive domains were evaluated.

The findings in this study suggest the need for additional investigation in several areas. In particular, early adulthood may be a critical period to promote physical activity for healthy cognitive aging, especially as physical activity levels during this life stage track with activity levels in later life.10,66 More research is also needed to understand the association between screen-based sedentary behaviors and cognitive function, especially clarification of the mechanisms of this association, exploration of the full range of sedentary behaviors, and possible effects independent of physical activity. Regarding population-based health, the effect of sedentary behavior may be especially consequential because the use of screen-based technologies for work and leisure has increased in the past several decades.4,14

Conclusions

Our results indicate that the lifestyle behaviors in early adulthood that were evaluated in this study could have an effect on the risk of cognitive impairment in midlife and support a potential role for both physical activity and sedentary behavior as modifiable risk factors for prevention. Individuals with both low physical activity and high sedentary behavior may represent a critical target group.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Tina D. Hoang, MSPH, Northern California Institute for Research and Education, 4150 Clement St, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 116-H, San Francisco, CA 94121 (tina.hoang@va.gov).

Submitted for Publication: August 14, 2015; final revision received October 8, 2015; accepted October 11, 2015.

Published Online: December 2, 2015. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2468.

Author Contributions: Dr Yaffe had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Hoang, Jacobs, Launer, Whitmer, Sidney, Yaffe.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Hoang, Yaffe.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Hoang, Zhu.

Obtained funding: Reis, Jacobs, Launer, Sidney, Yaffe.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Reis.

Study supervision: Reis, Whitmer, Yaffe.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Yaffe serves on data safety and monitoring boards for Takeda, Inc and a National Institutes of Health–sponsored study and is a member of the Alzheimer’s Association Medical and Scientific Advisory Council. No other disclosures are reported.

Funding/Support: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study is conducted and supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) in collaboration with the University of Alabama at Birmingham (HHSN268201300025C and HHSN268201300026C), Northwestern University (HHSN268201300027C), University of Minnesota (HHSN268201300028C), Kaiser Foundation Research Institute (HHSN268201300029C), and the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (HHSN268200900041C). CARDIA is also partially supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and an intra-agency agreement between the NIA and NHLBI (AG0005). The CARDIA Cognitive Function Ancillary Study is supported by grant HL122658 from the NHLBI. Dr Yaffe is also supported by grant K24 AG031155 from the NIA.

Role of Funder/Sponsor: The NHLBI participated in the design and conduct of the study as well as collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data. The manuscript was reviewed by the CARDIA Publications and Presentations Committee for scientific content.

References
1.
Voss  MW, Nagamatsu  LS, Liu-Ambrose  T, Kramer  AF.  Exercise, brain, and cognition across the life span.  J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011;111(5):1505-1513.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Singh  A, Uijtdewilligen  L, Twisk  JWR, van Mechelen  W, Chinapaw  MJM.  Physical activity and performance at school: a systematic review of the literature including a methodological quality assessment.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(1):49-55.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Buchman  AS, Boyle  PA, Yu  L, Shah  RC, Wilson  RS, Bennett  DA.  Total daily physical activity and the risk of AD and cognitive decline in older adults.  Neurology. 2012;78(17):1323-1329.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Ng  SW, Popkin  BM.  Time use and physical activity: a shift away from movement across the globe.  Obes Rev. 2012;13(8):659-680.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Gordon-Larsen  P, Nelson  MC, Popkin  BM.  Longitudinal physical activity and sedentary behavior trends: adolescence to adulthood.  Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(4):277-283.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Zick  CD, Smith  KR, Brown  BB, Fan  JX, Kowaleski-Jones  L.  Physical activity during the transition from adolescence to adulthood.  J Phys Act Health. 2007;4(2):125-137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Kwan  MY, Cairney  J, Faulkner  GE, Pullenayegum  EE.  Physical activity and other health-risk behaviors during the transition into early adulthood: a longitudinal cohort study.  Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(1):14-20.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Caspersen  CJ, Pereira  MA, Curran  KM.  Changes in physical activity patterns in the United States, by sex and cross-sectional age.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9):1601-1609.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Larouche  R, Laurencelle  L, Shephard  RJ, Trudeau  F.  Life transitions in the waning of physical activity from childhood to adult life in the Trois-Rivières study.  J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(4):516-524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Telama  R.  Tracking of physical activity from childhood to adulthood: a review.  Obes Facts. 2009;2(3):187-195.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Dik  M, Deeg  DJH, Visser  M, Jonker  C.  Early life physical activity and cognition at old age.  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003;25(5):643-653.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Middleton  LE, Barnes  DE, Lui  L-Y, Yaffe  K.  Physical activity over the life course and its association with cognitive performance and impairment in old age.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(7):1322-1326.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Zhu  N, Jacobs  DR  Jr, Schreiner  PJ,  et al.  Cardiorespiratory fitness and cognitive function in middle age: the CARDIA Study.  Neurology. 2014;82(15):1339-1346.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Chau  JY, Merom  D, Grunseit  A, Rissel  C, Bauman  AE, van der Ploeg  HP.  Temporal trends in non-occupational sedentary behaviours from Australian Time Use Surveys 1992, 1997 and 2006.  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(1):76.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Duncan  MJ, Vandelanotte  C, Caperchione  C, Hanley  C, Mummery  WK.  Temporal trends in and relationships between screen time, physical activity, overweight and obesity.  BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):1060.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Barnes  DE, Blackwell  T, Stone  KL, Goldman  SE, Hillier  T, Yaffe  K; Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.  Cognition in older women: the importance of daytime movement.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(9):1658-1664.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Wang  S, Luo  X, Barnes  D, Sano  M, Yaffe  K.  Physical activity and risk of cognitive impairment among oldest-old women.  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014; 22(11):1149-1157. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Kesse-Guyot  E, Charreire  H, Andreeva  VA,  et al.  Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of different sedentary behaviors with cognitive performance in older adults.  PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47831.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Hughes  GH, Cutter  G, Donahue  R,  et al.  Recruitment in the Coronary Artery Disease Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.  Control Clin Trials. 1987;8(4)(suppl):68S-73S.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Friedman  GD, Cutter  GR, Donahue  RP,  et al.  CARDIA: study design, recruitment, and some characteristics of the examined subjects.  J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(11):1105-1116.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Sidney  S, Jacobs  DR  Jr, Haskell  WL,  et al.  Comparison of two methods of assessing physical activity in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.  Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133(12):1231-1245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
22.
Jacobs  DR, Hahn  LP, Haskell  WL, Pirie  P, Sidney  S.  Validity and reliability of short physical activity history: CARDIA and the Minnesota Heart Health Program.  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 1989;9(11):448-459.Google ScholarCrossref
23.
Hankinson  AL, Daviglus  ML, Bouchard  C,  et al.  Maintaining a high physical activity level over 20 years and weight gain.  JAMA. 2010;304(23):2603-2610.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Gabriel  KP, Sidney  S, Jacobs  DR  Jr,  et al.  Convergent validity of a brief self-reported physical activity questionnaire.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(8):1570-1577.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Wechsler  D.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–III (WAIS-III). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1997.
26.
Stroop  JR.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.  J Exp Psychol. 1935;18(6):643.Google ScholarCrossref
27.
MacLeod  CM.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.  Psychol Bull. 1991;109(2):163-203.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Rosenberg  SJ, Ryan  JJ, Prifitera  A.  Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test performance of patients with and without memory impairment.  J Clin Psychol. 1984;40(3):785-787.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Schmidt  M.  Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test: A Handbook. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services; 1996.
30.
Kamboh  MI, Ferrell  RE, Kottke  B.  Genetic studies of human apolipoproteins. V. A novel rapid procedure to screen apolipoprotein E polymorphism.  J Lipid Res. 1988;29(11):1535-1543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
31.
Howard  BV, Gidding  SS, Liu  K.  Association of apolipoprotein E phenotype with plasma lipoproteins in African-American and white young adults: the CARDIA Study.  Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148(9):859-868.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Singh-Manoux  A, Hillsdon  M, Brunner  E, Marmot  M.  Effects of physical activity on cognitive functioning in middle age: evidence from the Whitehall II prospective cohort study.  Am J Public Health. 2005;95(12):2252-2258.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
van Gelder  BM, Tijhuis  MAR, Kalmijn  S, Giampaoli  S, Nissinen  A, Kromhout  D.  Physical activity in relation to cognitive decline in elderly men: the FINE Study.  Neurology. 2004;63(12):2316-2321.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Richards  M, Hardy  R, Wadsworth  MEJ.  Does active leisure protect cognition? evidence from a national birth cohort.  Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(4):785-792.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Tierney  MC, Moineddin  R, Morra  A, Manson  J, Blake  J.  Intensity of recreational physical activity throughout life and later life cognitive functioning in women.  J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;22(4):1331-1338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
36.
Dregan  A, Gulliford  MC.  Leisure-time physical activity over the life course and cognitive functioning in late mid-adult years: a cohort-based investigation.  Psychol Med. 2013;43(11):2447-2458.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Verburgh  L, Konigs  M, Scherder  EJ, Oosterlaan  J.  Physical exercise and executive functions in preadolescent children, adolescents and young adults: a meta-analysis.  Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(12):973-979.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Stroth  S, Hille  K, Spitzer  M, Reinhardt  R.  Aerobic endurance exercise benefits memory and affect in young adults.  Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19(2):223-243.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Chang  YK, Tsai  CL, Hung  TM, So  EC, Chen  FT, Etnier  JL.  Effects of acute exercise on executive function: a study with a Tower of London Task.  J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2011;33(6):847-865.PubMedGoogle Scholar
40.
Sibley  BA, Etnier  JL, Le Masurier  GC.  Effects of an acute bout of exercise on cognitive aspects of Stroop performance.  J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2006;28(3):285-299.Google Scholar
41.
Hillman  CH, Motl  RW, Pontifex  MB,  et al.  Physical activity and cognitive function in a cross-section of younger and older community-dwelling individuals.  Health Psychol. 2006;25(6):678-687.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Kamijo  K, Takeda  Y.  Regular physical activity improves executive function during task switching in young adults.  Int J Psychophysiol. 2010;75(3):304-311.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Åberg  MAI, Pedersen  NL, Torén  K,  et al.  Cardiovascular fitness is associated with cognition in young adulthood.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(49):20906-20911.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Ploughman  M.  Exercise is brain food: the effects of physical activity on cognitive function.  Dev Neurorehabil. 2008;11(3):236-240.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Ahlskog  JE, Geda  YE, Graff-Radford  NR, Petersen  RC.  Physical exercise as a preventive or disease-modifying treatment of dementia and brain aging.  Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(9):876-884.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
Erickson  KI, Raji  CA, Lopez  OL,  et al.  Physical activity predicts gray matter volume in late adulthood: the Cardiovascular Health Study.  Neurology. 2010;75(16):1415-1422.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
47.
Rovio  S, Spulber  G, Nieminen  LJ,  et al.  The effect of midlife physical activity on structural brain changes in the elderly.  Neurobiol Aging. 2010;31(11):1927-1936.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
48.
Brown  BM, Peiffer  JJ, Taddei  K,  et al.  Physical activity and amyloid-β plasma and brain levels: results from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle Study of Ageing.  Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18(8):875-881.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
49.
Liang  KY, Mintun  MA, Fagan  AM,  et al.  Exercise and Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers in cognitively normal older adults.  Ann Neurol. 2010;68(3):311-318.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
50.
Brown  BM, Peiffer  JJ, Martins  RN.  Multiple effects of physical activity on molecular and cognitive signs of brain aging: can exercise slow neurodegeneration and delay Alzheimer’s disease?  Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18(8):864-874.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
51.
Inoue  S, Sugiyama  T, Takamiya  T, Oka  K, Owen  N, Shimomitsu  T.  Television viewing time is associated with overweight/obesity among older adults, independent of meeting physical activity and health guidelines.  J Epidemiol. 2012;22(1):50-56.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
52.
Grøntved  A, Hu  FB.  Television viewing and risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis.  JAMA. 2011;305(23):2448-2455.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
53.
Stamatakis  E, Hamer  M, Mishra  GD.  Early adulthood television viewing and cardiometabolic risk profiles in early middle age: results from a population, prospective cohort study.  Diabetologia. 2012;55(2):311-320.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
54.
Wang  JYJ, Zhou  DHD, Li  J,  et al.  Leisure activity and risk of cognitive impairment: the Chongqing Aging Study.  Neurology. 2006;66(6):911-913.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
55.
Lindstrom  HA, Fritsch  T, Petot  G,  et al.  The relationships between television viewing in midlife and the development of Alzheimer’s disease in a case-control study.  Brain Cogn. 2005;58(2):157-165.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
56.
Geda  YE, Topazian  HM, Roberts  LA,  et al.  Engaging in cognitive activities, aging, and mild cognitive impairment: a population-based study.  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;23(2):149-154.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
57.
Fogel  J, Carlson  MCPHD.  Soap operas and talk shows on television are associated with poorer cognition in older women.  South Med J. 2006;99(3):226-233.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
58.
Tremblay  MS, Colley  RC, Saunders  TJ, Healy  GN, Owen  N.  Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle.  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010;35(6):725-740.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
59.
Allison  MA, Jensky  NE, Marshall  SJ, Bertoni  AG, Cushman  M.  Sedentary behavior and adiposity-associated inflammation: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.  Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(1):8-13.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
60.
Pinto Pereira  SM, Ki  M, Power  C.  Sedentary behaviour and biomarkers for cardiovascular disease and diabetes in mid-life: the role of television-viewing and sitting at work.  PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31132.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
61.
Costigan  SA, Barnett  L, Plotnikoff  RC, Lubans  DR.  The health indicators associated with screen-based sedentary behavior among adolescent girls: a systematic review.  J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(4):382-392.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
62.
Teychenne  M, Ball  K, Salmon  J.  Sedentary behavior and depression among adults: a review.  Int J Behav Med. 2010;17(4):246-254.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
63.
Sisson  SB, Shay  CM, Broyles  ST, Leyva  M.  Television-viewing time and dietary quality among U.S. children and adults.  Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(2):196-200.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
64.
Loprinzi  PD, Herod  SM, Cardinal  BJ, Noakes  TD.  Physical activity and the brain: a review of this dynamic, bi-directional relationship.  Brain Res. 2013;1539:95-104.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
65.
Daly  M, McMinn  D, Allan  JL.  A bidirectional relationship between physical activity and executive function in older adults.  Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:1044.PubMedGoogle Scholar
66.
Craigie  AM, Lake  AA, Kelly  SA, Adamson  AJ, Mathers  JC.  Tracking of obesity-related behaviours from childhood to adulthood: a systematic review.  Maturitas. 2011;70(3):266-284.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
×