[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 3,986
Citations 0
Viewpoint
July 1, 2020

Telehealth for Substance-Using Populations in the Age of Coronavirus Disease 2019: Recommendations to Enhance Adoption

Author Affiliations
  • 1Veteran Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • 2Addiction Center and Mental Health Innovations, Services & Outcomes Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • 3Injury Prevention Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
JAMA Psychiatry. Published online July 1, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1698

US health care systems are rapidly responding to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by mobilizing resources to treat infected patients and prevent further transmission. Concurrently, patients with behavioral health conditions continue to need health care or they risk becoming silent casualties of the pandemic. National data indicate that 7.8% of adults met past-year criteria for a substance use disorder (SUD).1 These patients, including those with co-occurring mental health disorders, are vulnerable to serious consequences, including overdose and suicide, if treatments and psychosocial services are disrupted by COVID-19. With COVID-19, it is imperative to minimize transmission while continuing SUD and mental health care in the context of rapidly evolving health care response and policies. This presents an urgent, unprecedented need for telemedicine and mobile health in SUD care and the need to understand how to implement these services now and continue them long term.

Telehealth increases availability and reach of treatments, but it has been underused and understudied in patients with SUDs.2 Telehealth encompasses a range of telecommunication platforms to support or provide health care at a distance. Here, telehealth encompasses (1) telemedicine or synchronous videoconferencing between clinicians and patients in separate locations; and (2) mobile health, involving telephone, text, or web-based interventions. In the age of COVID-19, telehealth uniquely supports health care delivery while preserving social distancing, reducing disease transmission.

Prior to COVID-19, regulatory hurdles limited wide-scale adoption of telehealth for SUDs. Since COVID-19, 5 major changes have rapidly reduced barriers across the United States:

  1. The Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008 imposed rules around telemedicine prescribing of controlled medications. With the federal declaration of a public health emergency, the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) announced that DEA-registered clinicians may prescribe schedule II through V medications for patients they have not seen in person if they are using telemedicine prescribing for legitimate medical reasons under usual practice in concert with relevant state and federal laws.3 This allows telemedicine and, more recently, telephone visits3 to start buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder, without patients first coming to clinic in person.

  2. The US Department of Health and Human Services announced it will waive Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act penalties for “good faith use of telehealth.”4

  3. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration issued guidance that restrictions on use and disclosure of patient identifying information under Code of Federal Regulations 42, part 2, specifically applying to behavioral health, would not apply in medical emergencies determined by the clinician.3

  4. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration issued new guidance for opioid treatment programs, indicating these programs may also prescribe buprenorphine via telehealth and liberalized the number of days of take-home medications, reducing in-person visits.3

  5. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is temporarily waiving restrictions, allowing Medicare to cover additional telehealth services.5

These changes remove major regulatory hurdles and enhance the ability to reimburse telemedicine-delivered SUD treatments, including both effective medication and psychotherapy treatments, while reducing the risk for transmitting COVID-19. However, these changes alone are likely insufficient to facilitate widespread adoption of telehealth for SUDs, now or in the future.

Compared with mental health, adoption of telehealth for SUDs has been limited6 because SUD treatment often relies on frequent visits, intense monitoring through urine toxicology, and other practices that pose additional barriers.7 Another major barrier to telehealth adoption is clinician discomfort and concern about loss of therapeutic rapport in remote visits.8 In addition, wide-scale telehealth adoption requires both training in and access to secure technologies for both patients and clinicians. All of this introduces new costs and logistical complexity for health systems.

While we know challenges occur with new clinical practices, there is currently an unprecedented, unanticipated urgency and need. Here we describe 3 recommendations to facilitate rapid implementation of telehealth for SUD services. These suggestions also encompass considerations to minimize disruptions in care and enhance SUD treatment access beyond COVID-19.

  1. Overall guidelines for patient-centered, evidence-based SUD care that incorporate some specific considerations for telemedicine-delivered treatment are needed. Although general practice recommendations exist,9 additional guidance can identify a range of reasonable practices for telemedicine-delivered treatment to ensure similar standards of care. Historically, most SUD treatment has relied on a fairly intensive monitoring and treatment. There is a pressing need to weigh the pros and cons of high-threshold care during COVID-19, but these considerations will also be key after COVID-19. Issues pertinent to telemedicine include identifying a reasonable frequency and means of obtaining urine toxicology screens and models of telehealth for more complex patients at high risk for substance use, particularly in the absence or limited availability of higher levels of care. Some of these challenges can be addressed using mobile health technologies to monitor substance use via remote self-report monitoring apps, transdermal devices, and photo verification of mailed biological tests.10 Incorporating these considerations within current guidelines can help increase clinicians’ comfort as they begin using telehealth.

  2. Additional interventions are needed to help facilitate telemedicine prescribing of controlled medications, particularly buprenorphine for opioid use disorder treatment. Buprenorphine is a life-saving treatment,9 but there are not enough prescribers. To attract and train clinicians to deliver care via telehealth, toolkits are needed to provide information, in addition to the clinical considerations previously mentioned, including technology and infrastructure, billing and reimbursement policies, changing federal- and state-level regulations, and strategies to encourage clinic adoption. The limited number of buprenorphine prescribers also makes telemedicine a particularly attractive option for reaching patients in rural and other low-treatment access areas. However, further research and expert consensus is needed to inform key questions, such as how we overcome limited infrastructure and enhance patient acceptability in rural areas. In addition, research is needed comparing the effectiveness of different forms of telehealth including at-home delivery, remote clinic delivery, and most recently during COVID-19, telephone delivery. There are no trials to date examining or comparing these modalities, all of which clinicians are now actively using.

  3. Additional resources and tools are needed to help patients with SUDs and with comorbid mental health disorders manage added psychosocial stressors. The stress and uncertainty brought on by COVID-19 emphasize the importance of having resources, including psychotherapy treatment, case management, crisis support, and community supports, available. Making resources accessible online3 and adapting evidence-based psychotherapy treatments to telehealth is key and would also support care after COVID-19. In particular, group therapy is a hallmark of SUD care, which can be delivered via telemedicine, although privacy issues must be considered (eg, recording conversations and private location).

As we work fervently toward addressing the COVID-19 pandemic, we must also continue delivering ongoing treatment for patients, especially for those whom treatment disruptions may result in equally dire consequences. Telehealth can uniquely address capacity shortages, but much work is needed to support large-scale dissemination and adoption. In the future, it will also be critical to understand the effects on treatment uptake and on patient outcomes to assess the quality of care delivered. Lifting of restrictions during COVID-19 is helpful, but many of these guidelines pertain to care only under the current public health emergency. For lasting improvements to occur in treatment access, we need to make these changes permanent. Hopefully, years from now, we will look back at this moment not only as a tragedy but also as a period of rapid improvements in our ability to provide care for patients with SUDs and other mental health disorders.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Lewei (Allison) Lin, MD, MS, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd, Bldg 16, 2nd Floor, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (leweil@med.umich.edu).

Published Online: July 1, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1698

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Lin is supported by a Career Development Award (CDA 18-008) from the US Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Service. Dr Fernandez is supported by the National Institute for Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K23 AA023869). No other disclosures were reported.

References
1.
2018 NSDUH detailed tables: CBHSQ data. Accessed March 25, 2020. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2018-nsduh-detailed-tables
2.
Lin  LA, Casteel  D, Shigekawa  E, Weyrich  MS, Roby  DH, McMenamin  SB.  Telemedicine-delivered treatment interventions for substance use disorders: a systematic review.   J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019;101:38-49. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2019.03.007PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Coronavirus (COVID-19): coronavirus. Published March 19, 2020. Accessed April 15, 2020. https://www.samhsa.gov/coronavirus
4.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Emergency response; emergency situations: preparedness, planning, and response. Accessed April 15, 2020. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/emergency-preparedness/index.html
5.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Telemedicine. Accessed May 26, 2020. https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/benefits/telemed/index.html
6.
Huskamp  HA, Busch  AB, Souza  J,  et al.  How is telemedicine being used in opioid and other substance use disorder treatment? health affairs.   Health Aff. 2018;37(12).doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05134Google Scholar
7.
Kourounis  G, Richards  BDW, Kyprianou  E, Symeonidou  E, Malliori  M-M, Samartzis  L.  Opioid substitution therapy: lowering the treatment thresholds.   Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;161:1-8. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.12.021PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Chakrabarti  S.  Usefulness of telepsychiatry: a critical evaluation of videoconferencing-based approaches.   World J Psychiatry. 2015;5(3):286-304. doi:10.5498/wjp.v5.i3.286PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
American Society of Addiction Medicine. The ASAM national practice guideline for the treatment of opioid use disorder: 2020 focused update. Accessed May 26, 2020. https://www.asam.org/docs/default-source/quality-science/npg-jam-supplement.pdf?sfvrsn=a00a52c2_2
10.
Ramo  DE, Thrul  J, Chavez  K, Delucchi  KL, Prochaska  JJ.  Feasibility and quit rates of the tobacco status project: a facebook smoking cessation intervention for young adults.   J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(12):e291. doi:10.2196/jmir.5209PubMedGoogle Scholar
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×