Background
This study investigated the relationship of executive and memory impairment to relapse, recurrence, and course of residual depressive symptoms and signs after remission of geriatric major depression.
Methods
Fifty-eight elderly subjects remitted from major depression received continuation nortriptyline treatment (plasma levels 60-150 ng/mL) for 16 weeks and then were randomly assigned to either nortriptyline maintenance therapy or placebo for up to 2 years. Diagnosis was made using the Research Diagnostic Criteria and the DSM-IV criteria after an interview using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. Executive dysfunction and memory were assessed with the Dementia Rating Scale, disablity and social support were rated with the Philadelphia Multiphasic Instrument, and medical burden was assessed with the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale.
Results
Abnormal initiation and perseveration scores, but not memory impairment, were associated with relapse and recurrence of geriatric depression and with fluctuations of depressive symptoms in the whole group and in subjects who never met criteria for relapse or recurrence during the follow-up period. Memory impairment, disability, medical burden, social support, and history of previous episodes did not significantly influence the outcome of depression in this sample.
Conclusions
Executive dysfunction was found to be associated with relapse and recurrence of geriatric major depression and with residual depressive symptoms. These observations, if confirmed, will aid clinicians in identifying patients in need of vigilant follow-up. The findings of this study provide the rationale for investigation of the role of specific prefrontal pathways in predisposing or perpetuating depressive syndromes or symptoms in elderly patients.
EXECUTIVE dysfunction, including disturbances in planning, sequencing, organizing, and abstracting, has been reported in late-life depression.1 Disorders of the basal ganglia and their prefrontal projections are often complicated by depression and result in executive dysfunction.2,3
Consistent with clinical observations, white matter hyperintensities have been reported in geriatric depression4-6 and mainly occur in subcortical structures and their frontal projections. Ischemic lesions of the caudate head and the left frontal pole often lead to depression.7 Reduced basal ganglia volumes8,9 and changes in the activity of the caudate nucleus10 and the frontal regions11-15 have also been observed in depression. The basal ganglia, the prefrontal areas, the amygdala, and some paralimbic regions seem to be abnormally activated in young persons with depression.16,17
Recently, we reported that executive impairment predicts poor or delayed antidepressant response of geriatric major depression.18 Hypometabolism of the rostral anterior cingulate was reported in treatment-resistant depression, while cingulate hypermetabolism was associated with favorable response19,20; integrity of the anterior cingulate is required for some executive functions. White matter hyperintensities were found to predict chronicity of geriatric depression21,22 and to be correlated with executive dysfunction.23 Finally, white matter hyperintensities were associated with low quantitative electroencephalographic coherence,24 a measure of cerebral connectivity. Low coherence was shown to predict chronicity of late-life depression.25
Unlike executive dysfunction, memory impairment does not seem to influence the response to antidepressant treatment. In 2 samples of elderly subjects, memory impairment was not associated with change in depressive symptoms over time.18,26
Besides chronicity, adverse consequences of depression include relapse occurring within 4 to 6 months from remission, recurrence occurring after a well interval of 4 to 6 months or longer, and subsyndromal depressive symptoms. Chronicity, relapse, and recurrence may be related events resulting from a common diathesis contributing to poor prognosis. Conversely, chronicity, relapse, and recurrence may be independent of each other, since some studies found them to have different predictors.27
Based on findings showing that executive dysfunction18 as well its functional20,25 and structural22 imaging correlates predict chronicity of geriatric depression, this study investigated the relationship of executive dysfunction to relapse and recurrence. Deficits in initiation and perseveration (IP) were used as the index of executive dysfunction, since this measure was found to predict chronicity18 and also is disrupted in disorders of frontal28 and subcortical structures.29 We tested the hypothesis that deficits in IP, but not memory impairment, predict early relapse and recurrence as well as fluctuation of depressive symptoms after remission of geriatric depression.
The subjects were consecutively recruited elderly psychiatric patients aged 65 years and older. They had achieved remission from major depression after treatment with the antidepressant nortriptyline at dosages resulting in plasma levels ranging from 60 to 150 ng/mL. At entry, the subjects had met Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC)30 and DSM-IV criteria31 for unipolar major depression without psychotic features, had a score of 19 or greater on the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS),32 and a score of 1 (absent) on the Delusions and Hallucinations items of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia–Lifetime Version (SADS-L).33 The subjects were considered in remission if they no longer met RDC criteria for depression and had an HDRS score of 10 or lower and a Cornell Scale34 score of 6 or lower for 3 consecutive weeks. Cornell Scale scores of 6 and lower discriminate depressed from nondepressed elderly patients.34
Depressed patients were excluded if they had (1) history of other psychiatric disorders (except personality disorders) prior to their depression; (2) severe or acute medical illness (eg, metastatic cancer, brain tumors, decompensated cardiac, hepatic, or renal failure, or myocardial infarction or stroke within the 3 months preceding the study); (3) neurological disorders (eg, delirium, Parkinson disease, or multiple sclerosis); (4) conditions and drugs that may cause depression (endocrinopathies other than diabetes, lymphoma, or pancreatic cancer, or the use of steroids, β-blockers, α-methyl-dopa, clonidine, reserpine, tamoxifen, or cimetidine); or (5) Mini-Mental State Examination35 score of less than 17. Therefore, the subjects were nondelusional depressed elderly patients with a wide range of cognitive impairment.
To increase protocol adherence, only subjects residing within a 45-minute drive from the hospital were selected. All subjects were required to have informants who had knowledge of the subject's history and enough contact so that they could observe changes within a week. Subjects and informants provided written informed consent.
The SADS-L and parts of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV–Patient Version36 were initially administered when the subjects were symptomatic. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 24-item HDRS. The HDRS was administered again after 6, 9, and 12 weeks of antidepressant treatment to ascertain remission of depression.
Baseline cognitive impairment was rated with the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (DRS).37 Besides a score of overall impairment, the DRS yields subscores for impairment in (1) IP, (2) memory, (3) construction, (4) conceptualization, and (5) attention. The IP domain tests (1) verbal IP (eg, "In 1 minute, name all things that you can buy in a supermarket"); (2) alternating movements; and (3) graphomotor design (eg, reproduce XOXO). The memory domain consists of tests of orientation, verbal recall, verbal recognition, visual matching, and visual memory.
At baseline, medical burden was assessed with the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, Modified Version for Geriatrics (CIRS-G).38 The CIRS-G rates chronic medical burden from 14 organ systems. Information was obtained from medical history and physical examination, as well as the available laboratory test results. A total score was computed by adding the subscores of each organ system except the psychiatric/behavioral system. Baseline disability, social support, and physical environment were assessed with the Philadelphia Multilevel Assessment Instrument (MAI).39
Once the subjects achieved remission, they received controlled continuation treatment for 16 weeks. Nortriptyline was administered in a single dose at bedtime and plasma levels were obtained monthly. Nortriptyline was chosen because of its known efficacy in long-term treatment of geriatric depression.40 The dosage was adjusted if nortriptyline plasma levels were not within 60 to 150 ng/mL. Following completion of continuation treatment, the subjects were assigned either to nortriptyline (plasma levels 60-150 ng/mL) or to placebo maintenance treatment for 2 years using random computer numbers, and were followed up under double-blind conditions. In patients randomized to placebo, transition from continuation to maintenance treatment occurred during a period of 10 weeks by reducing the daily dose by 10 mg every 1 to 2 weeks and substituting nortriptyline capsules for an increasing number of inert capsules. The subjects received their medication in 2-week supply kits that permitted dispensation of their daily dosage separately. Throughout the study, the patient visits followed a medication clinic model. No subject received formal psychotherapy.
The subjects were systematically assessed monthly during the continuation phase, every 2 weeks during the transition phase, and every 2 months during the maintenance phase. Assessment consisted of administration of the HDRS and the DRS as well as pill counts. Electrocardiograms and nortriptyline plasma levels were obtained every 2 months and, if needed, the nortriptyline dosage was adjusted to achieve nortriptyline plasma levels of 60 to 150 ng/mL.
Survival analysis with proportional risk hazards was used to study the relationship of the hypothesized variables to the occurrence of relapse and recurrence. Mixed-effects models were used to study the relationship of the hypothesized variables to the course of depressive symptoms over time. This analysis treats depressive symptoms and signs (total HDRS score) as a continuous variable and assesses their fluctuation over time. Concordance correlation41 was used to evaluate the goodness-of-fit of the resultant models and determine the strength of agreement between values estimated by the model and observed values. Two-tailed α levels of significance above .05 were used.
A total of 100 subjects received open acute nortriptyline treatment targeting nortriptyline plasma levels between 80 and 120 ng/mL. Of these, 5 dropped out of the study, 7 failed to tolerate nortriptyline, 28 did not achieve remission of depression (HDRS score of ≤10 for 3 consecutive weeks), and 2 died during the acute phase. Therefore, 58 depressed elderly subjects met criteria for remission and entered the continuation phase; 4 of these subjects participated in an acute treatment study as described earlier.18 Of the 58 subjects, 1 was unavailable for follow-up; the remaining 57 subjects completed the continuation phase. The clinical characteristics of these subjects suggest that when symptomatic they had moderate to severe depression, and a wide range of cognitive impairment, medical comorbidity, disability, and social support (Table 1).
Relapse of geriatric depression
Of the 57 subjects who completed the 16-week continuation treatment phase, 7 (12%) had a relapse. Relapsed subjects met RDC and DSM-IV criteria for major depression and had an HDRS score of 17 or greater. To test the hypothesis that IP and not memory impairment predicts relapse, a Cox proportional hazard model was constructed consisting of IP memory and age. The model was associated with relapse (likelihood ratio test = 9.72, df = 3, P<.03). However, only IP was a significant contributor (odds ratio = 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66-0.98, z = −2.2, P<.03) (Figure 1), while memory and age were not significantly related to relapse. Relapse could not be attributed to differences in the intensity of nortriptyline treatment. The last nortriptyline plasma levels of subjects who relapsed were statistically indistinguishable from those who remained well (t56 = 1.11, P = .28). Post hoc analysis using univariate Cox proportional hazard models showed that the number of previous depressive episodes, medical comorbidity (CIRS-G), disability (MAI Instrumental Activities of Daily Living [IADL] index and MAI Mobility index), and poor social support (MAI index) were not significantly associated with relapse of depression in this sample. Education (years in school; r = 0.34, P<.009) and IADL impairment (r55 = 0.43, P<.001) were weakly correlated with IP scores. However, education and IADL index were not significantly associated with relapse of depression.
Relapse is a discrete event. Focusing on relapse alone does not offer information about the course of depressive symptoms and signs (total HDRS score) that do not meet criteria for a new depressive episode. For this reason, the course of depressive symptoms after remission of depression was studied first in all subjects who had continuation treatment, and then only in subjects who never had a relapse. When all subjects who participated in the continuation treatment phase were included, a model consisting of IP, memory, their linear and curvilinear relationship to time, and relapse (presence vs absence) had a high concordance correlation (0.77) with the observed depressive symptoms over time. However, IP (F = 6.04, P<.02), IP × time (F = 6.26, P<.01), and IP × time2 (F = 6.22, P<.01) were the only variables significantly associated with course of depressive symptoms, while memory alone or in interaction with time had no significant relationship to depressive symptoms and signs.
A separate analysis of subjects who had no relapse during the continuation treatment phase showed that a model consisting of IP, memory, and their linear and curvilinear relationships to time had a high concordance correlation (0.73) with the observed depressive symptoms over time. However, only IP (F = 5.40, P<.02), IP × time (F = 5.89, P<.02), and IP × time2 (F = 5.69, P<.02) were significantly associated with depressive symptoms over time (Figure 2), while memory alone or in interaction with its linear and curvilinear relationship to time had no significant relationship to depressive symptoms and signs.
Recurrence of geriatric depression
Of the 57 subjects who completed the continuation phase, 43 agreed to participate in the maintenance phase (Table 1) and were randomly assigned either to nortriptyline or placebo. Of the 43 subjects who entered the maintenance phase, 22 continued to receive nortriptyline and 21 were switched to placebo. A total of 15 subjects (35%) had a recurrence during the maintenance phase. Subjects treated with placebo had a higher recurrence rate (52% [n = 11])than subjects who were maintained with nortriptyline (18% [n = 4]).
To test the hypothesis that IP and not memory impairment predicts recurrence of depression, a Cox proportional hazard model was constructed consisting of the DRS subscores of IP and memory as well as age and treatment assignment. The model was associated with risk for recurrence (likelihood ratio test = 12.9, df = 4, P<.02). However, only IP (risk ratio = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.69-0.99, z = −2.08, P<.04) and treatment assignment (risk ratio = 7.25, 95% CI = 1.97-26.66, z = −2.98, P<.004) were significant predictors (Figure 1), while memory (risk ratio = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.93-1.61, z = 1.44, P<.15) and age (odds ratio = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.99-1.15, z = 1.71, P<.09) did not reach significance. Recurrence could not be attributed to differences in the intensity of nortriptyline treatment. The last nortriptyline plasma levels of subjects who had a recurrence were statistically indistinguishable from those who remained well (t53 = 0.43, P = .68). Post hoc analysis using univariate Cox proportional hazard models showed that the number of previous depressive episodes, medical comorbidity (CIRS-G), disability (MAI Mobility index), and poor social support (MAI index) were not significantly associated with recurrence of depression. The IADL index correlated with IP scores (r41 = 0.55, P<.001) but IADL itself was not associated with recurrence.
The relationship of IP and memory to depressive symptoms (total HDRS score) occurring during the maintenance phase was studied using mixed-effects models. First, all patients who received nortriptyline or placebo maintenance therapy were included. A model consisting of IP, memory, their linear and curvilinear relationships to time, group membership (nortriptyline vs placebo), age, and recurrence (presence vs absence) was found to have high concordance correlation (0.68) with fluctuation of depressive symptoms during the maintenance treatment phase. Initiation and preservation (F = 13.20, P<.001), age (F = 19.76, P<.001), and time × recurrence (F = 19.25, P<.001) were the only significant predictors of the course of depressive symptoms.
Subsequent analysis focused on the subjects who did not have a recurrence during the follow-up period. A model consisting of IP, memory, group assignment (nortriptyline vs placebo), age, time, and time × group assignment was found to have high concordance correlation (rc = 0.62) with the course of depressive symptoms. However, IP (F = 6.79, P<.009), age (F = 17.26, P<.001), and memory (F = −5.98, P<.02) were the only variables significantly associated with depressive symptoms. Unlike IP, better memory performance was associated with higher HDRS scores.
The principal finding of this study is that abnormal IP scores are associated with risk for relapse and recurrence and predict the course of depressive symptoms after remission of geriatric depression. These relationships may be specific to IP, since memory impairment is not related to relapse, recurrence, or fluctuations of depressive symptoms.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify a relationship between executive dysfunction and relapse and recurrence of geriatric depression or subthreshold depressive symptoms. This observation parallels previous reports suggesting that executive dysfunction,18 as well as its functional20,25 and structural21,22 imaging correlates, is associated with chronicity of geriatric depression. Together, these findings suggest that executive dysfunction constitutes a cognitive dimension associated with poor outcomes of geriatric depression.
Memory impairment did not have a significant relationship to relapse or recurrence. Memory scores were not associated with subsyndromal depressive symptoms during the continuation phase and had an inverse relationship with the course of depressive symptoms during the maintenance phase. These observations suggest that the relationship of executive dysfunction to relapse, recurrence, and subsyndromal depressive symptoms and signs is rather specific.
A potential explanation is that pathway disruption underlying executive dysfunction confers increases the propensity of geriatric depression toward chronicity and recurrence. This conceptualization allows that clinical (such as history of recurrences) and psychosocial factors (such as poor social support) may modify the effect of this vulnerability, although no such effects were observed in this sample.
Executive dysfunction may result from disruption of the cortical-striato-pallido-thalamo-cortical (CSPTC) pathways. Five CSPTC pathways have been described. Each pathway includes a direct circuit with a net excitatory input to the cortex and an indirect circuit with a net inhibitory input.42,43 It has been proposed that imbalance favoring the inhibitory circuit of specific CSPTC pathways may contribute to depression.44,45 The CSPTC pathways' function is modulated by the raphe nuclei, locus ceruleus, and ventral tegmentum. Dysfunction of specific pathways can occur through vascular and degenerative processes by disrupting them directly or by damaging their connections to monoaminergic nuclei.6,46-49
Beyond elucidating the pathophysiology of the course of geriatric depression, our findings offer a rationale for novel psychopharmacological hypotheses. The main neurotransmitters modulating the CSTPC pathways are dopamine, acetylcholine, and enkephalin.6,42 Therefore, studies need to investigate whether drugs influencing these neurotransmitters can prevent relapses and recurrences in elderly patients with executive dysfunction.
On a clinical level, the association of executive dysfunction to relapse and recurrence may have implications for patient care. Depressed elderly patients with executive dysfunction may require frequent follow-up assessments, so that additional interventions can be instituted soon after the first depressive symptoms become evident. Education of patients and families may increase clinicians' ability to identify relapse or recurrence of depression early. Rehabilitative techniques may be used in elderly patients with remitted depression to remedy disturbances in planning, sequencing, and organizing their activities and increase their functional ability and quality of life. However, research needs to examine whether remedying disability resulting from executive dysfunction prevents relapses or recurrences, since the affective vulnerability associated with executive dysfunction may not be mediated by disability, as shown in this sample.
A limitation of this study is the rather small number of subjects who participated in the placebo-controlled nortriptyline maintenance treatment phase. Moreover, these findings cannot be generalized to treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the most frequently used drugs in geriatric depression. Another limitation is the use of a brief neuropsychological instrument that was designed primarily for use with dementia patients and tests some but not all executive functions. However, the DRS subscales of IP and memory used by this study seem to discriminate subcortical dementias from Alzheimer disease, a predominantly cortical dementia. Autopsy studies have shown that patients with the subcortical dementing disorders Huntington disease and supranuclear palsy perform significantly worse than patietns with Alzheimer disease on the IP subscale but better on the memory subscale of the DRS.50 These measures correctly classified 80% of patients with Alzheimer disease and 90% of patients with Huntington disease. Similarly, high impairment in the IP subscale of the DRS and low impairment in the memory subscale characterized patients with Parkinson disease and distinguished them from those with Alzheimer disease.51 Moreover, functional imaging studies suggest that several functions tested by the IP subscale require integrity of prefrontal circuitry. Performance of a verbal fluency task increases left dorsolateral prefrontal activity.52 Learning a new motor sequence results in activation of the dorsal prefrontal cortex and the anterior cingulate.53,54 Nonetheless, replication of our study with a more extensive neuropsychological battery is necessary.
In conclusion, this study observed that executive dysfunction constitutes a risk factor for relapse and recurrence of geriatric depression and predicts the course of depressive symptoms even in patients who do not develop a new depressive episode. The clinical value of this observation is that patients with executive impairment should be targeted for close follow-up, and should be considered for rehabilitative treatment and family counseling that may reduce their disability and family burden. The heuristic value of this finding is that it provides the basis for an empirical inquiry of the pathophysiology of relapse and recurrence. Neuropsychological and functional neuroimaging techniques may be used to describe the role of specific CSPTC pathways in modifying the course of geriatric depression. Finally, drugs influencing neurotransmission of dopamine, acetylcholine, and enkephalin may be studied for their ability to prevent relapse and recurrence of depression in elderly patients with executive dysfunction.
Accepted for publication September 17, 1999.
This work was supported by grants RO1 MH42819, RO1 MH51842, P30 MH49762, and T32 MH19132 from the National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, Md, and the Sanchez Foundation, Chicago, Ill.
Presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Psychopharmacology, Kona, Hawaii, December 8, 1997.
Corresponding author: George S. Alexopoulos, MD, Cornell Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21 Bloomingdale Rd, White Plains, NY 10605 (e-mail: gsalexop@mail.med.cornell.edu).
1.Lesser
IBoone
KBMehringer
CMWohl
MAMiller
BLBerman
NG Cognition and white matter hyperintensities in older depressed adults.
Am J Psychiatry. 1996;1531280- 1287
Google Scholar 2.Massman
PJDelis
DCButters
NDupont
RMGillin
JC The subcortical dysfunction hypothesis of memory deficits in depression: neuropsychological validation in a subgroup of patients.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1992;14687- 706
Google ScholarCrossref 3.Sobin
CSacheim
HA Psychomotor symptoms of depression.
Am J Psychiatry. 1997;1544- 17
Google Scholar 4.Krishnan
KRRHays
JCBlazer
DG MRI-defined vascular depression.
Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154497- 500
Google Scholar 5.Coffey
CEFigiel
GSDjang
WTWeiner
RD Subcortical hyperintensity in MRI: a comparison of normal and depressed elderly subjects.
Am J Psychiatry. 1990;147187- 189
Google Scholar 6.Krishnan
KRR Neuroanatomic substrates of depression in the elderly.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1993;639- 58
Google ScholarCrossref 7.Starkstein
SERobinson
RGBerthier
MLPrice
TR Depressive disorders following posterior circulation as compared with middle cerebral artery infarcts.
Brain. 1988;111375- 387
Google ScholarCrossref 8.Krishnan
KRRMcDonald
WEscalona
RDoraiswamy
MNa
CHusain
MMFigiel
GSBoyko
OBEllinwood
EHNemeroff
CB Magnetic resonance imaging of the caudate nuclei in depression.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49553- 557
Google ScholarCrossref 9.Husain
MMcDonald
WDoraiswamy
PFigiel
GSNa
CEscalona
RBoyko
ONemeroff
CKrishnan
K A magnetic resonance imaging study of putamen nuclei in major depression.
Psychiatry Res. 1991;4095- 99
Google ScholarCrossref 10.Buchsbaum
MSWu
JDeLisi
LEHolcomb
HKessler
RJohnson
JKing
ACHazlett
ELangston
KPost
RM Frontal cortex and basal ganglia metabolic rates assessed by positron emission tomography with [18F] 2-deoxyglucose in affective illness.
J Affect Disord. 1986;10137- 152
Google ScholarCrossref 11.Drevets
WCRaichle
ME Neuroanatomical circuits in depression: implications for treatment mechanisms.
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1992;28261- 274
Google Scholar 12.Lesser
IMMena
IBoone
KBMiller
BLMehringer
CMWohl
M Reduction of cerebral blood flow in older depressed patients.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51677- 686
Google ScholarCrossref 13.Drevets
WCPrice
JLSimpson
JR
JrTodd
RDReich
TVannier
MRaichle
ME Subgenual prefrontal cortex abnormalities in mood disorders.
Nature. 1997;386824- 827
Google ScholarCrossref 14.Bench
CJFriston
KJBrown
RGScott
LCFrackowiak
RSDolan
RJ The anatomy of melancholia: focal abnormalities of cerebral blood flow in major depression.
Psychol Med. 1992;22607- 615
Google ScholarCrossref 15.Mayberg
HS Frontal lobe dysfunction in secondary depression.
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1994;6428- 442
Google Scholar 16.Drevets
WCVideen
TOPrice
JLPreskorn
SHCarmichael
STRaichle
ME A functional anatomical study of unipolar depression.
J Neurosci. 1992;123628- 3641
Google Scholar 17.Drevets
WC Functional neuroimaging studies of depression: the anatomy of melancholia.
Annu Rev Med. 1998;49341- 361
Google ScholarCrossref 18.Kalayam
BAlexopoulos
GS Prefrontal dysfunction and treatment response in geriatric depression.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56713- 718
Google ScholarCrossref 19.Mayberg
HS Limbic-cortical dysregulation: a proposed model of depression.
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1997;9471- 481
Google Scholar 20.Mayberg
HSBrannan
SKMahurin
RKJerabek
PABrickman
JSTekell
JLSilva
JAMcGinnis
SGlass
TG Cingulate function in depression: a potential predictor of treatment response.
Neuroreport. 1997;81057- 1061
Google ScholarCrossref 21.Coffey
CDFigiel
GSDjang
WTSaunders
WBWeiner
RD White matter hyperintensity on magnetic resonance imaging: clinical and neuroanatomic correlates in the depressed elderly.
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1989;1135- 144
Google Scholar 22.Hickie
IScott
EMitchell
PWilhelm
KAustin
MPBennett
B Subcortical hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging: clinical correlates and prognostic significance in patients with severe depression.
Biol Psychiatry. 1995;37151- 160
Google ScholarCrossref 23.Boone
KBMiller
BLLesser
IMMerhinger
CMHill-Gutierrez
EGoldberg
MBerman
NG Neuropsychological correlates of white matter lesions in healthy elderly subjects.
Arch Neurol. 1992;49549- 554
Google ScholarCrossref 24.Leuchter
AFDunkin
JJLufkin
RBAnzai
YCook
IANewton
TF Effect of white matter disease on functional connections in the aging brain.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;571347- 1354
Google ScholarCrossref 25.Leuchter
ASimon
SLDaly
KAAbrams
MRosenberg-Thompson
SDunkin
JJCook
IANewton
TFSpar
JE Quantitative EEG correlates of outcome in older psychiatric patients, part II: two-year follow-up of patients with depression.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1994;2290- 299
Google ScholarCrossref 26.Mattis
SAlexopoulos
GSMeyers
BSYoung
RC Neuropsychology of late-onset depression.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1993;1480
Google Scholar 27.Alexopoulos
GSChester
JG Outcomes of geriatric depression.
Clin Geriatr Med. 1992;8363- 376
Google Scholar 29.Masterman
DLCummings
JL Frontal-subcortical circuits: the anatomical basis of executive, social and motivated behaviors.
J Psychopharmacol. 1997;11107- 114
Google ScholarCrossref 31.American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition Washington, DC American Psychiatric Association1994;
33.Spitzer
RLEndicott
J Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia–Lifetime Version. New York Biometrics Research Dept, New York State Psychiatric Institute1975;
34.Alexopoulos
GSAbrams
RCYoung
RCShamoian
CA Cornell Scale for depression in dementia.
Biol Psychiatry. 1988;23271- 284
Google ScholarCrossref 36.Spitzer
RLWilliams
JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV–Patient Version. New York Biometrics Research Dept, New York State Psychiatric Institute1995;
37.Mattis
S Dementia Rating Scale. Odessa, Fla Psychological Assessment Resources1989;
38.Miller
MDParadis
CFHouck
PRMazumdar
SStack
JARifai
AHMulsant
BReynolds
CF
III Rating chronic medical burden in geropsychiatric practice and research: application on the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale.
Psychiatry Res. 1992;41237- 248
Google ScholarCrossref 39.Lawton
MPMoss
MFulcomer
MKleban
MH A research and services oriented Multilevel Assessment Instrument.
J Gerontol. 1982;3791- 99
Google ScholarCrossref 40.Reynolds
CF
IIIPerel
FPImber
SDCornes
CMiller
MDMazumdar
SHouck
PRDew
MAStack
JAPollock
BGKupfer
DJ Nortriptyline and interpersonal psychotherapy as maintenance therapies for major depression: a randomized controlled trial in patients older than 59 years.
JAMA. 1999;28139- 45
Google ScholarCrossref 41.Vonesh
EHChinchilli
VMPu
K Goodness of fit in generalized nonlinear mixed-effects models.
Biometrics. 1996;52572- 587
Google ScholarCrossref 42.George
MSKetter
TAPost
RM Prefrontal cortex dysfunction in clinical depression.
Depression. 1994;259- 72
Google ScholarCrossref 43.Alexander
GEDeLong
MRStrick
PL Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex.
Ann Rev Neurosci. 1986;9357- 381
Google ScholarCrossref 44.Baxter
LR
JrSchwartz
LMGuze
BHBergman
KSzuba
MP PET imaging in obsessive-compulsive disorder with and without depression.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1990;51
(suppl)
61- 69
Google Scholar 45.Baxter
LR Brain imaging as a tool in establishing a theory of brain pathology in obsessive compulsive disorder.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1990;51
(suppl)
22- 25
Google Scholar 46.Alexopoulos
GSMeyers
BSYoung
RCCampbell
SSilbersweig
DCharlson
M "Vascular depression" hypothesis.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54915- 922
Google ScholarCrossref 47.Alexopoulos
GSMeyers
BSYoung
RCKakuma
TSilbersweig
DCharlson
M Clinically defined vascular depression.
Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154562- 565
Google Scholar 48.Dolan
RJBench
CJBrown
RGScott
LCFriston
KJFrackowiak
RSJ Regional cerebral blood flow abnormalities in depressed patients with cognitive impairment.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55768- 773
Google ScholarCrossref 49.Mayberg
HSSolomon
DH Depression in Parkinson's disease: a biochemical and organic viewpoint. Weiner
WJLang
AEeds.
Behavioral Neurology of Movement Disorders. Advances in Neurology Vol 65 New York, NY Raven Press1995;49- 60
Google Scholar 50.Rosser
AFHodges
JR The Dementia Rating Scale in Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease and progressive supranuclear palsy.
J Neurol. 1994;241531- 536
Google ScholarCrossref 51.Paolo
AMTroster
AIGlatt
SLHubble
JPKoller
WC Differentiation of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases with the Dementia Rating Scale.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1995;8184- 188
Google ScholarCrossref 52.Frith
CDFriston
KJLiddle
PFFrackowiak
RSJ A PET study of word finding.
Neuropsychologia. 1991;291137- 1148
Google ScholarCrossref 53.Hikosaka
SKMiyauchi
STakino
RSasaki
YPutz
B Transition of brain activation from frontal to parietal areas in visuomotor sequence learning.
J Neurosci. 1998;181827- 1840
Google Scholar 54.Jueptner
MStephan
KMFrith
CDBrooks
DJFrackowiak
RSJPassingham
RE Anatomy of motor learning, I: frontal cortex and attention to action.
J Neurophysiol. 1997;771313- 1324
Google Scholar