Torture vs Other Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment: Is the Distinction Real or Apparent? | Depressive Disorders | JAMA Psychiatry | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.185.54. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
 United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.  Geneva, Switzerland Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights1987;http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/h_cat39.htmDecember 18 2006
2.
 Amnesty International Report 2005. Amnesty International Web site.http://web.amnesty.org/report2005/usa-summary-engFebruary 25, 2006
3.
US Defense Department, Working group report on detainee interrogations in the global war on terrorism: assessment of legal, historical, policy and operational considerations, April 4, 2003. Greenberg  KJDratel  JLeds The Torture Papers. Cambridge, Mass Cambridge University Press2005;286- 359Google Scholar
4.
US Justice Department, Memorandum for James B. Comey, Deputy Attorney General, re: legal standards applicable under 18 USC §§ 2340-2340A. http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/iln/osc/documents/ag_memo_august_12_2005.pdfAccessed February 25, 2006
5.
Başoğlu  MMineka  S The role of uncontrollable and unpredictable stress in post-traumatic stress responses in torture survivors. Başoğlu  Med Torture and Its Consequences: Current Treatment Approaches. Cambridge, Mass Cambridge University Press1992;182- 225Google Scholar
6.
Başoğlu  MLivanou  MCrnobarić  CFrančišković  TSuljić  EĐurić  DVranešić  M Psychiatric and cognitive effects of war in former Yugoslavia: the relationship between lack of redress for trauma and posttraumatic stress reactions.  JAMA 2005;294580- 590PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Mineka  S Animal models of anxiety-based disorders: their usefulness and limitations. Tuma  AHMaser  Jeds Anxiety and the Anxiety Disorders. Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence A Erlbaum Associates1985;199- 244Google Scholar
8.
Mineka  SKelly  K The relationship between anxiety, lack of control and loss of control. Steptoe  AAppels  Aeds Stress, Personal Control and Health. Brussels, Belgium Wiley1989;163- 191Google Scholar
9.
Mineka  SZinbarg  R Conditioning and ethological models of anxiety disorders. Hope  DAed Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln University of Nebraska Press1996;Google Scholar
10.
Mineka  S Animal models of clinical psychology. Smelser  NBaltes  Peds International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford, England Elsevier Science 2002;2020- 2025Google Scholar
11.
Mineka  SZinbarg  R A contemporary learning theory perspective on the etiology of anxiety disorders: it's not what you thought it was.  Am Psychol 2006;6110- 26PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Mineka  SSutton  J Contemporary learning theory perspectives on the etiology of fears and phobias. Craske  MGHermans  DVansteenwegen  Deds Fear and Learning: From Basic Processes to Clinical Implications. Washington, DC American Psychological Association2006;75- 97Google Scholar
13.
Watters  JKBiernacki  P Targeted sampling: options for the study of hidden populations.  Soc Probl 1989;36416- 430Google ScholarCrossref
14.
Frank  OSnijders  T Estimating the size of hidden populations using snowball sampling.  J Off Stat 1994;1053- 67Google Scholar
15.
First  MBGibbon  MSpitzer  RLWilliams  JBW User's Guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Research Version 2.0.  New York Biometrics Research Dept, New York State Psychiatric Institute 1996;
16.
Blake  DDWeathers  FWNagy  LMKaloupek  DGCharney  DSKeane  T Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS): Current and Lifetime Diagnostic Version.  Boston, Mass Behavioral Science Division, National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder1990;
17.
Başoğlu  MPaker  MPaker  ÖOzmen  EMarks  IIncesu  CSahin  DSarimurat  N Psychological effects of torture: a comparison of tortured with non-tortured political activists in Turkey.  Am J Psychiatry 1994;15176- 81PubMedGoogle Scholar
18.
Başoğlu  MMineka  SPaker  MAker  TLivanou  MGök  S Psychological preparedness for trauma as a protective factor in survivors of torture.  Psychol Med 1997;271421- 1433PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Başoğlu  MPaker  M Severity of trauma as predictor of long-term psychological status in survivors of torture.  J Anxiety Disord 1995;9339- 350Google ScholarCrossref
20.
Mineka  SKihlstrom  J Unpredictable and uncontrollable events: a new perspective on experimental neurosis.  J Abnorm Psychol 1978;87256- 271PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Regehr  CCadell  SJansen  K Perceptions of control and long-term recovery from rape.  Am J Orthopsychiatry 1999;69110- 115PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Maes  MDelmeire  LMylle  JAlmatura  C Risk and preventive factors of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): alcohol consumption and intoxication prior to a traumatic event diminishes the relative risk to develop PTSD in response to that trauma.  J Affect Disord 2001;63113- 121PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Gudjonnson  GH The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook.  Chichester, England John Wiley & Sons2003;26
24.
Gudjonnson  GHMacKeith  JAC False confessions: psychological effects of interrogation: a discussion paper. Trankell  Aed Reconstructing the Past: The Role of Psychologists in Criminal Trials. Deventer, the Netherlands Kluwer 1982;269Google Scholar
25.
Baron  RA Human Aggression.  New York, NY Plenum Press1977;
26.
Averill  JR Anger and Aggression: An Essay on Emotion.  New York, NY Springer-Verlag1982;
27.
Weiss  JMPohorecky  LSalman  SGruenthal  M Attenuation of gastric lesions by psychological aspects of aggression in rats.  J Comp Physiol Psychol 1976;90252- 259PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Başoğlu  MJaranson  JMMollica  RKastrup  M Torture and mental health: a research overview. Gerrity  EKeane  TMTuma  Feds The Mental Health Consequences of Torture. New York, NY Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers2001;35- 62Google Scholar
Original Article
March 2007

Torture vs Other Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment: Is the Distinction Real or Apparent?

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Section of Trauma Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, University of London, London, England (Drs Başoğlu and Livanou); and Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Hospital Zvezdara, Belgrade, Serbia (Dr Crnobarić).

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(3):277-285. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.3.277
Abstract

Context  After the reports of human rights abuses by the US military in Guantanamo Bay, Iraq, and Afghanistan, questions have been raised as to whether certain detention and interrogation procedures amount to torture.

Objective  To examine the distinction between various forms of ill treatment and torture during captivity in terms of their relative psychological impact.

Design and Setting  A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a population-based sample of survivors of torture from Sarajevo in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Banja Luka in Republica Srpska, Rijeka in Croatia, and Belgrade in Serbia.

Participants  A total of 279 survivors of torture accessed through linkage sampling in the community (Banja Luka, Sarajevo, and Rijeka) and among the members of 2 associations for war veterans and prisoners of war (Belgrade).

Main Outcome Measures  Scores on the Semi-structured Interview for Survivors of War, Exposure to Torture Scale, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, and Clinician-Administered PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder) Scale for DSM-IV.

Results  Psychological manipulations, humiliating treatment, exposure to aversive environmental conditions, and forced stress positions showed considerable overlap with physical torture stressors in terms of associated distress and uncontrollability. In regression analyses, physical torture did not significantly relate to posttraumatic stress disorder (odds ratio, 1.41, 95% confidence interval, 0.89-2.25) or depression (odds ratio, 1.41, 95% confidence interval, 0.71-2.78). The traumatic stress impact of torture (physical or nonphysical torture and ill treatment) seemed to be determined by perceived uncontrollability and distress associated with the stressors.

Conclusions  Ill treatment during captivity, such as psychological manipulations, humiliating treatment, and forced stress positions, does not seem to be substantially different from physical torture in terms of the severity of mental suffering they cause, the underlying mechanism of traumatic stress, and their long-term psychological outcome. Thus, these procedures do amount to torture, thereby lending support to their prohibition by international law.

×