[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.173.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
1.
Fumagalli  FMolteni  RRacagni  GRiva  MA Stress during development: impact on neuroplasticity and relevance to psychopathology.  Prog Neurobiol 2007;81 (4) 197- 217PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Nemeroff  CB Neurobiological consequences of childhood trauma.  J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65 (Suppl 1) 18- 28PubMedGoogle Scholar
3.
Dong  MGiles  WHFelitti  VJDube  SRWilliams  JEChapman  DPAnda  RF Insights into causal pathways for ischemic heart disease: adverse childhood experiences study.  Circulation 2004;110 (13) 1761- 1766PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Dong  MDube  SRFelitti  VJGiles  WHAnda  RF Adverse childhood experiences and self-reported liver disease.  Arch Intern Med 2003;163 (16) 1949- 1956PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Brown  DWYoung  KEAnda  RFFelitti  VJGiles  WH Re: asthma and the risk of lung cancer.  Cancer Causes Control 2006;17 (3) 349- 350PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Anda  RFFelitti  VJBremner  JDWalker  JDWhitfield  CPerry  BDDube  SRGiles  WH The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood.  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2006;256 (3) 174- 186PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Dube  SRMiller  JWBrown  DWGiles  WHFelitti  VJDong  MAnda  RF Adverse childhood experiences and the association with ever using alcohol and initiating alcohol use during adolescence.  J Adolesc Health 2006;38 (4) 444.e1- 444.e10PubMed10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.06.006Google Scholar
8.
DePanfilis  DSalus  M Child Protective Services: A Guide for Caseworkers.  Washington, DC US Dept of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children and Families, Administration for Children, Youth, and Families, Children's Bureau, Office on Child Abuse and Neglect2003;
9.
Marcenko  MStaerkel  E Home visiting for parents of pre-school children in the US. McCauley  CPecora  PJRose  WE Enhancing the Well Being of Children and Families Through Effective InterventionsUK and USA Evidence for Practice. London, England Jessica Kingsley Publishers2006;Google Scholar
10.
Chamberlain  P Family Connections: Treatment Foster Care for Adolescents With Delinquency.  Eugene, OR Castalia Press1994;
11.
US Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families, Children's Bureau, Child maltreatment 2005. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm05/index.htm. Accessed July 2, 2007
12.
US Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families, Children's Bureau, The AFCARS Report: preliminary FY 2004 estimates as of June 2006. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/stats_research/afcars/tar/report11.htm. Accessed March 18, 2007
13.
US Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families, Children's Bureau, The AFCARS Report No. 13: preliminary FY 2005 estimates as of September 2006. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/stats_research/afcars/tar/report13.htm. Accessed November 7, 2006
14.
Scarcella  CABess  RZielewski  EHGeen  R The cost of protecting vulnerable children, V: understanding state variation in child welfare financing. http://www.urban.org/publications/311314.html. Accessed April 15, 2007
15.
Bess  RAndrews  CAJantz  ARussell  VGeen  R The Cost of Protecting Vulnerable Children, III: What Factors Affect States' Fiscal Decisions?  Washington, DC Urban Institute2002;
16.
Pew Commission, Fostering the future: safety, permanence and well-being for children in foster care: the Pew Commission on Children in Foster Care. http://pewfostercare.org/researchdocs/FinalReport.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2007
17.
US Government Accountability Office, Foster Youth: HHS Actions Could Improve Coordination of Services and Monitoring of States' Independent Living Programs.  Washington, DC US Government Accountability Office2004;GAO-05-25
18.
Wulczyn  FBarth  RPYuan  YYJones-Harden  BLandsverk  J Beyond Common Sense: Child Welfare, Child Well-being, and the Evidence for Policy Reform.  Somerset, NJ Transaction Aldine2005;
19.
Fanshel  DFinch  SJGrundy  JF Foster Children in a Life Course Perspective: The Casey Family Program Experience.  New York, NY Columbia University Press1988;
20.
Kessler  RCUstün  TB The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative Version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI).  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2004;13 (2) 93- 121PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC American Psychiatric Association1994;
22.
Haro  JMArbabzadeh-Bouchez  SBrugha  TSdi Girolamo  GGuyer  MEJin  RLepine  JPMazzi  FReneses  BVilagut Saiz  GSampson  NAKessler  RC Concordance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys.  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2006;15 (4) 167- 180PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
National Center for Health Statistics, Health, United States, 2004.  Hyattsville, MD National Center for Health Statistics2004;
24.
Schoenborn  CAAdams  PFSchiller  JS Summary health statistics for the US population: National Health Interview Survey, 2000.  Vital Health Stat 10 2003; (214) 1- 83PubMedGoogle Scholar
25.
Knight  MStewart-Brown  SFletcher  L Estimating health needs.  J Public Health Med 2001;23 (3) 179- 186PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Baker  MStabile  MDeri  C What do self-reported, objective, measures of health measure?  J Hum Resour 2004;39 (4) 1067- 1093Google Scholar
27.
Bergmann  MMByers  TFreedman  DSMokdad  A Validity of self-reported diagnoses leading to hospitalization.   Am J Epidemiol 1998;147 (10) 969- 977PubMedGoogle Scholar
28.
 Evaluation of National Health Interview Survey diagnostic reporting.  Vital Health Stat 2 1994; (120) 1- 116PubMedGoogle Scholar
29.
Kriegsman  DMPenninx  BWvan Eijk  JTBoeke  AJDeeg  DJ Self-reports and general practitioner information on the presence of chronic diseases in community dwelling elderly.  J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49 (12) 1407- 1417PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Barnett  DManly  JTCicchetti  D Defining child maltreatment: the interface between policy and research. Cicchetti  DToth  S Child Abuse, Child Development, and Social Policy. Norwood, NJ Ablex Publishing Corp1993;Google Scholar
31.
Rosenbaum  PRRubin  DB Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score.  J Am Stat Assoc 1984;79 (387) 516- 524Google Scholar
32.
Hosmer  DWLemeshow  S Applied Logistic Regression.  New York, NY John Wiley & Sons Inc1989;
33.
Kish  LFrankel  MR Inferences from complex samples.  J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 1974;36 (1) 1- 37Google Scholar
34.
Cohen  J A power primer.  Psychol Bull 1992;112 (1) 155- 159Google Scholar
35.
Cohen  J Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence A Erlbaum Associates1988;
36.
Chatellier  GZapletal  ELemaitre  DMenard  JDegoulet  P The number needed to treat.  BMJ 1996;312 (7028) 426- 429PubMedGoogle Scholar
37.
Haro  JMKontodimas  SNegrin  MARatcliffe  MSuarez  DWindmeijer  F Methodological aspects in the assessment of treatment effects in observational health outcomes studies.  Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2006;5 (1) 11- 25PubMedGoogle Scholar
38.
Stürmer  TJoshi  MGlynn  RJAvorn  JRothman  KJSchneeweiss  S A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods.  J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59 (5) 437- 447PubMedGoogle Scholar
39.
Helmert  UShea  S Social inequalities and health status in western Germany.  Public Health 1994;108 (5) 341- 356PubMedGoogle Scholar
40.
Kessler  RCChiu  WTDemler  OMerikangas  KRWalters  EE Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication [published correction appears in Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(7):709].  Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62 (6) 617- 627PubMedGoogle Scholar
41.
Merikangas  KRAmes  MCui  LStang  PEUstun  TBVon Korff  MKessler  RC The impact of comorbidity of mental and physical conditions on role disability in the US adult household population.  Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007;64 (10) 1180- 1188PubMedGoogle Scholar
42.
Kessler  RCMerikangas  KR The National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R): background and aims.  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2004;13 (2) 60- 68PubMedGoogle Scholar
43.
Cohen  JAMannarino  APZhitova  ACCapone  ME Treating child abuse–related posttraumatic stress and comorbid substance abuse in adolescents.  Child Abuse Negl 2003;27 (12) 1345- 1365PubMedGoogle Scholar
Original Article
June 2, 2008

Effects of Enhanced Foster Care on the Long-term Physical and Mental Health of Foster Care Alumni

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Kessler, Mss Hiripi and Sampson, and Mr Hwang); Research Services (Drs Pecora, and O’Brien, and Downs and Mr Williams) and Systems Improvement (Dr English), Casey Family Programs, Seattle, Washington; School of Social Work (Drs Pecora and English), University of Washington, Seattle; School of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon (Dr White); and Evans School of Public Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle (Drs Zerbe and Plotnick). Mr Williams is now with the Social Work Evaluation Program, University of Alaska Anchorage.

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(6):625-633. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.65.6.625
Abstract

Context  Child maltreatment is a significant risk factor for adult mental disorders and physical illnesses. Although the child welfare system routinely places severely abused and/or neglected children in foster care, no controlled studies exist to determine the effectiveness of this intervention in improving the long-term health of maltreated youth.

Objective  To present results of the first quasi-experimental study, to our knowledge, to evaluate the effects of expanded foster care treatment on the mental and physical health of adult foster care alumni.

Design  We used a quasi-experimental design to compare adult outcomes of alumni of a model private foster care program and 2 public programs. The latter alumni were eligible for but not selected by the private program because of limited openings. Propensity score weights based on intake records were adjusted for preplacement between-sample differences. Personal interviews administered 1 to 13 years after leaving foster care assessed the mental and physical health of alumni.

Setting/Participants  A representative sample of 479 adult foster care alumni who were placed in foster care as adolescents (14-18 years of age) between January 1, 1989, and September 30, 1998, in private (n = 111) or public (n = 368) foster care programs in Oregon and Washington. More than 80% of alumni were traced, and 92.2% of those traced were interviewed.

Intervention  Caseworkers in the model program had higher levels of education and salaries, lower caseloads, and access to a wider range of ancillary services (eg, mental health counseling, tutoring, and summer camps) than caseworkers in the public programs. Youth in the model program were in foster care more than 2 years longer than those in the public programs.

Results  Private program alumni had significantly fewer mental disorders (major depression, anxiety disorders, and substance use disorders), ulcers, and cardiometabolic disorders, but more respiratory disorders, than did public program alumni.

Conclusion  Public sector investment in higher-quality foster care services could substantially improve the long-term mental and physical health of foster care alumni.

×