Eliminating Preventable Death on the Battlefield | Emergency Medicine | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Original Article
Dec 2011

Eliminating Preventable Death on the Battlefield

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: US Army Special Operations Command, Fort Bragg, North Carolina (Dr R. S. Kotwal, Mr Montgomery, and Ms B. M. Kotwal); Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland (Dr Champion); and US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston (Drs Butler, Mabry, Cain, and Blackbourne), Rural and Community Health Institute, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Bryan (Ms Mechler), and Center for Translational Injury Research, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston (Dr Holcomb).

Arch Surg. 2011;146(12):1350-1358. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.213

Objective To evaluate battlefield survival in a novel command-directed casualty response system that comprehensively integrates Tactical Combat Casualty Care guidelines and a prehospital trauma registry.

Design Analysis of battle injury data collected during combat deployments.

Setting Afghanistan and Iraq from October 1, 2001, through March 31, 2010.

Patients Casualties from the 75th Ranger Regiment, US Army Special Operations Command.

Main Outcome Measures Casualties were scrutinized for preventable adverse outcomes and opportunities to improve care. Comparisons were made with Department of Defense casualty data for the military as a whole.

Results A total of 419 battle injury casualties were incurred during 7 years of continuous combat in Iraq and 8.5 years in Afghanistan. Despite higher casualty severity indicated by return-to-duty rates, the regiment's rates of 10.7% killed in action and 1.7% who died of wounds were lower than the Department of Defense rates of 16.4% and 5.8%, respectively, for the larger US military population (P = .04 and P = .02, respectively). Of 32 fatalities incurred by the regiment, none died of wounds from infection, none were potentially survivable through additional prehospital medical intervention, and 1 was potentially survivable in the hospital setting. Substantial prehospital care was provided by nonmedical personnel.

Conclusions A command-directed casualty response system that trains all personnel in Tactical Combat Casualty Care and receives continuous feedback from prehospital trauma registry data facilitated Tactical Combat Casualty Care performance improvements centered on clinical outcomes that resulted in unprecedented reduction of killed-in-action deaths, casualties who died of wounds, and preventable combat death. This data-driven approach is the model for improving prehospital trauma care and casualty outcomes on the battlefield and has considerable implications for civilian trauma systems.