Surgeons use risk-benefit analysis in our decisions to operate on specific patients. Rarely do we consider the economic implication, instead using the assumption that an individual would want enhanced quantity or quality of life, regardless of cost. This decision-making process is further supported by a separation of those who receive the benefit and those who pay the bill. However, when surgeons want to justify a new procedure or piece of equipment, economic benefit is often argued. Those contemplating paying for the procedure will balance expense with the improvement of quantity or quality of life for the insured.
Sax HC. Questioning the Economics of Bariatric SurgeryComment on “Health Expenditures Among High-Risk Patients After Gastric Bypass and Matched Controls”. Arch Surg. 2012;147(7):640–641. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2012.1021
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.