The article by Matsushima et al1 gives a new perspective on regionalization of care for trauma. In elderly patients who have been treated at level 1 and level 2 trauma centers in Pennsylvania, the authors noted a 25% decrease in mortality for those at centers that treat more than 100 geriatric patients annually. These high-volume geriatric trauma centers have lower rates of major complications, even lower incidences of failure to rescue after a major complication when compared with centers with fewer than 100 such patients annually. Conversely, at institutions that have larger numbers of nongeriatric trauma patients, there was a significantly higher rate of major complications for elderly individuals.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Zenilman ME. Should Regionalization Only Be in 1 Direction? JAMA Surg. 2014;149(4):327–328. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4861
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: