Copyright 2014 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
Physicians are regularly challenged to make treatment recommendations for patients whose diagnosis and prognosis are uncertain and for whom the highest-quality evidence is inconclusive. Consequently, physicians are generally accustomed to functioning in the fog of uncertainty. Until now, the dynamics of clinical decisions in the midst of uncertainty have been left to physicians to manage in partnership with their patients.
This is about to change, however, under stipulations of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Even as uncertainty persists, the ACA will exert pressure to measure quality in uniform ways that make winners and losers based on physicians’ different practice approaches. Nonetheless, to say that some physicians will be winners does not imply that patients will also win, particularly if newly established quality measures favor practice approaches that are ultimately proven inferior, with respect to patients’ outcomes.
Schoenfeld AJ, Harris MB, Davis M. Clinical Uncertainty at the Intersection of Advancing Technology, Evidence-Based Medicine, and Health Care Policy. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(12):1221–1222. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2014.382
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: