[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 411
Citations 0
Viewpoint
Surgical Outcomes Club
September 2017

Translating Patient-Reported Outcomes From Surgical Research to Clinical Care

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • 2Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison
JAMA Surg. 2017;152(9):811-812. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1583

It seems quite obvious in hindsight that surgeons should strive to optimize outcomes that matter to patients. Yet sometimes the obvious can be easily overlooked. For decades, surgical research was rich with measurement of blood loss, complications, and easily quantifiable variables which had differing meaning for patients. A revolution was needed to reframe our research agenda; perhaps we should ask patients what matters to them? In response, stakeholders have generated patient-reported outcomes (PROs), along with validated instruments, patient-centered research, and an emphasis on quality of life (QOL).

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×