[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Comment & Response
February 2018

Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Accreditation: Time to Move From Competition to Collaboration

Author Affiliations
  • 1Bariatric and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania
  • 2Bariatric and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
  • 3Cleveland Clinic Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
JAMA Surg. 2018;153(2):191. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4589

To the Editor We read with interest the article titled “Variation in Outcomes at Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence” by Ibrahim et al.1 The study used the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality administrative state inpatient databases to determine the variation in complication rates within accredited centers in 12 US states.

This study’s Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality data predate the formation of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) in 2014 and lack a critical factor for risk adjustment, namely body mass index.1 Previous studies2-4 have demonstrated that accredited centers treat larger, sicker patients with improved outcomes and lowered cost.

Add or change institution
×