Temporal Trends in Gender-Affirming Surgery Among Transgender Patients in the United States | Surgery | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Mizock  L, Lewis  TK.  Trauma in transgender populations: risk, resilience, and clinical care.  J Emotional Abuse. 2008;8(3):335-354.Google ScholarCrossref
2.
Walsham  K.  De-gendering health insurance: a case for a federal insurance nondiscrimination act.  Hastings Womens Law J. 2013;24(197):197-221.Google Scholar
3.
Coleman  E, Bockting  W, Botzer  M,  et al.  Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender-Nonconforming People, Version 7 Int J Transgenderism. 2012;13(4):165-232.Google ScholarCrossref
4.
Berli  JU, Knudson  G, Fraser  L,  et al.  What surgeons need to know about gender confirmation surgery when providing care for transgender individuals: a review.  JAMA Surg. 2017;152(4):394-400.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Padula  WV, Heru  S, Campbell  JD.  Societal implications of health insurance coverage for medically necessary services in the U.S. transgender population: a cost-effectiveness analysis.  J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(4):394-401.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Baker  KE.  The future of transgender coverage.  N Engl J Med. 2017;376(19):1801-1804.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Hage  JJ, Karim  RB.  Ought GIDNOS get nought? treatment options for nontranssexual gender dysphoria.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(3):1222-1227.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Monstrey  S, Hoebeke  P, Selvaggi  G,  et al.  Penile reconstruction: is the radial forearm flap really the standard technique?  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):510-518.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Doornaert  M, Hoebeke  P, Ceulemans  P, T’Sjoen  G, Heylens  G, Monstrey  S.  Penile reconstruction with the radial forearm flap: an update.  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2011;43(4):208-214.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Bizic  M, Kojovic  V, Duisin  D,  et al. An overview of neovaginal reconstruction options in male to female transsexuals. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:638919. Medline:24971387
11.
Monstrey  S, Selvaggi  G, Ceulemans  P,  et al.  Chest-wall contouring surgery in female-to-male transsexuals: a new algorithm.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(3):849-859.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Grant  JM, Mottet  LA, Tanis  J, Harrison  J, Herman  JL, Keisling  M. Injustice at Every Turn: A Report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force; 2011.
13.
Bradford  J, Reisner  SL, Honnold  JA, Xavier  J.  Experiences of transgender-related discrimination and implications for health: results from the Virginia Transgender Health Initiative Study.  Am J Public Health. 2013;103(10):1820-1829.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Introduction to the HCUP National Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2014. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_Introduction_2014.jsp. Published December 2016. Accessed May 26, 2017.
15.
Houchens RL, Ross DN, Elixhauser A, Jiang J. Nationwide Inpatient Sample redesign final report. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/reports/NISRedesignFinalReport040914.pdf. Published April 4, 2014. Accessed May 26, 2017.
16.
Elixhauser  A, Steiner  C. Clinical Classifications Software (CCS). http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/ccs/ccs.jsp. Updated 2014. Accessed May 26, 2017.
17.
The National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS). NIS data elements. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp#data. Accessed May 26, 2017.
18.
Maragh-Bass  AC, Torain  M, Adler  R,  et al.  Is it okay to ask: transgender patient perspectives on sexual orientation and gender identity collection in healthcare.  Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24(6):655-667.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Maragh-Bass  AC, Torain  M, Adler  R,  et al.  Risks, benefits, and importance of collecting sexual orientation and gender identity data in healthcare settings: a multi-method analysis of patient and provider perspectives.  LGBT Health. 2017;4(2):141-152.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
German  D, Kodadek  L, Shields  R,  et al.  Implementing sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in emergency departments: patient and staff perspectives.  LGBT Health. 2016;3(6):416-423.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Haider  AH, Schneider  EB, Kodadek  LM,  et al.  Emergency department query for patient-centered approaches to sexual orientation and gender identity: the EQUALITY study.  JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(6):819-828.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Cahill  S, Makadon  H.  Sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in clinical settings and in electronic health records: a key to ending LGBT health disparities.  LGBT Health. 2014;1(1):34-41.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Callahan  EJ, Sitkin  N, Ton  H, Eidson-Ton  WS, Weckstein  J, Latimore  D.  Introducing sexual orientation and gender identity into the electronic health record: one academic health center’s experience.  Acad Med. 2015;90(2):154-160.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Daniel  H, Butkus  R; Health and Public Policy Committee of American College of Physicians.  Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health disparities: executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians.  Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(2):135-137.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Deutsch  MB, Green  J, Keatley  J, Mayer  G, Hastings  J, Hall  AM; World Professional Association for Transgender Health EMR Working Group.  Electronic medical records and the transgender patient: recommendations from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health EMR Working Group.  J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(4):700-703.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Green  J, McGowan  S, Levi  J, Wallbank  R, Whittle  S.  Recommendations from the WPATH consensus process for revision of the DSM diagnosis of gender identity disorders: implications for human rights.  Int J Transgenderism. 2011;13(1):1-4.Google ScholarCrossref
27.
Nguyen  A, Lau  BD.  Collecting sexual orientation and gender identity information: filling the gaps in sexual and gender minority health  [published online December 21, 2017].  Med Care. 2017. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000000856PubMedGoogle Scholar
28.
Bockting  WO, Miner  MH, Swinburne Romine  RE, Hamilton  A, Coleman  E.  Stigma, mental health, and resilience in an online sample of the US transgender population.  Am J Public Health. 2013;103(5):943-951.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Beek  TF, Kreukels  BP, Cohen-Kettenis  PT, Steensma  TD.  Partial treatment requests and underlying motives of applicants for gender affirming interventions.  J Sex Med. 2015;12(11):2201-2205.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Sevelius  JM.  Gender affirmation: a framework for conceptualizing risk behavior among transgender women of color.  Sex Roles. 2013;68(11-12):675-689.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Sanchez  NF, Sanchez  JP, Danoff  A.  Health care utilization, barriers to care, and hormone usage among male-to-female transgender persons in New York City.  Am J Public Health. 2009;99(4):713-719.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Proctor  K, Haffer  SC, Ewald  E, Hodge  C, James  CV.  Identifying the transgender population in the Medicare program.  Transgend Health. 2016;1(1):250-265.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Obama  B.  United States health care reform: progress to date and next steps.  JAMA. 2016;316(5):525-532.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Lau  BD, Levine  A, Haider  AH.  Are surgical residents prepared to care for transgender patients? reply  [published online October 11, 2017].  JAMA Surg. 2018;153(1):93-94. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4025PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Toomey  PG, Teta  AF, Patel  KD, Ross  SB, Rosemurgy  AS.  High-volume surgeons vs high-volume hospitals: are best outcomes more due to who or where?  Am J Surg. 2016;211(1):59-63.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Al Kazzi  ES, Lau  B, Li  T, Schneider  EB, Makary  MA, Hutfless  S.  Differences in the prevalence of obesity, smoking and alcohol in the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.  PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0140165.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Lau  BD, Haut  ER, Hobson  DB,  et al.  ICD-9 code-based venous thromboembolism performance targets fail to measure up.  Am J Med Qual. 2016;31(5):448-453.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Shields  R, Lau  B, Haider  AH.  Emergency general surgery needs for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients: are we prepared?  JAMA Surg. 2017;152(7):617-618.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
July 2018

Temporal Trends in Gender-Affirming Surgery Among Transgender Patients in the United States

Author Affiliations
  • 1Johns Hopkins Surgery Center for Outcomes Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 2Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 3Center for Transgender Health, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 5Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 6Deputy Editor, JAMA Surgery
  • 7Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 8Division of Health Sciences Informatics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 9Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 10Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
JAMA Surg. 2018;153(7):609-616. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6231
Key Points

Question  What are the incidence of and trends in gender-affirming surgery over time in the United States?

Findings  In this population-based study of 37 827 gender-affirming surgical encounters, genital surgery increased over time and most patients undergoing these procedures were self-payers. The number of patients seeking these procedures who were covered by Medicare or Medicaid increased from 2012 to 2014 by 3-fold.

Meaning  As coverage for these procedures increases, likely so will demand for qualified surgeons to perform them.

Abstract

Importance  Little is known about the incidence of gender-affirming surgical procedures for transgender patients in the United States.

Objectives  To investigate the incidence and trends over time of gender-affirming surgical procedures and to analyze characteristics and payer status of transgender patients seeking these operations.

Design, Setting, and Participants  In this descriptive observational study from 2000 to 2014, data were analyzed from the National Inpatient Sample, a representative pool of inpatient visits across the United States. The initial analyses were done from June to August 2015. Patients of interest were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis codes for transsexualism or gender identity disorder. Subanalysis focused on patients with procedure codes for surgery related to gender affirmation.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Demographics, health insurance plan, and type of surgery for patients who sought gender-affirming surgery were compared between 2000-2005 and 2006-2011, as well as annually from 2012 to 2014.

Results  This study included 37 827 encounters (median [interquartile range] patient age, 38 [26-49] years) identified by a diagnosis code of transsexualism or gender identity disorder. Of all encounters, 4118 (10.9%) involved gender-affirming surgery. The incidence of genital surgery increased over time: in 2000-2005, 72.0% of patients who underwent gender-affirming procedures had genital surgery; in 2006-2011, 83.9% of patients who underwent gender-affirming procedures had genital surgery. Most patients (2319 of 4118 [56.3%]) undergoing these procedures were not covered by any health insurance plan. The number of patients seeking these procedures who were covered by Medicare or Medicaid increased by 3-fold in 2014 (to 70) compared with 2012-2013 (from 25). No patients who underwent inpatient gender-affirming surgery died in the hospital.

Conclusions and Relevance  Most transgender patients in this national sample undergoing inpatient gender-affirming surgery were classified as self-pay; however, an increasing number of transgender patients are being covered by private insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid. As coverage for these procedures increases, likely so will demand for qualified surgeons to perform them.

×