Longstanding data noting the volume-outcomes relationship in high-risk surgical procedures has led to ongoing work to realize the implied benefits.1,2 Two main strategies are considered: regionalization to high-volume centers and translation of best practices from high-volume centers to improve care across settings. Resultant increased travel distances from regionalization—an inconvenience when arriving for surgery—presents complex problems for patients at discharge that are magnified if complications occur. As Zafar et al3 found in their work, the benefits of regionalization are tempered because readmissions to local (nonindex) hospitals after major cancer surgery are associated with significantly higher risks of mortality and morbidity. The unintended consequences of regionalization warrant consideration.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Ivatury SJ, Wong SL. Regionalization, Readmissions, and Repercussions of Major Cancer Surgery. JAMA Surg. Published online April 11, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0403
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.