[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Invited Commentary
August 2018

All Surgical Readmissions Are Not Created Equal

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Surg. 2018;153(8):737. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0616

Hospital readmissions are an important quality indicator1; however, Mull et al2 emphasize that, unlike for patients with an index admission for medical treatment, all-cause readmission is not an appropriate indicator of quality of care for postoperative patients. In a modified Delphi process, a multidisciplinary panel assessed diagnosis codes related to 30-day postoperative readmission in a Veterans Affairs population and found that one-third of postoperative readmissions are unlikely to reflect deficiencies in surgical quality. Their findings are similar to those reported by Marks and colleagues3 in a smaller pediatric population. As government and private payers implement pay-for-performance metrics, the current study cautions that not every surgical readmission reflects poor quality and not every readmission should be penalized.

Add or change institution
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words