Cardiac arrest following blunt trauma has dismal outcomes and optimal prehospital management provides the only chance of survival.1 Debate continues regarding who should treat patients with severe injuries in the prehospital setting; in some countries, physicians routinely provide care in the field, while in others (ie, the United States), this is nearly unheard of. Fukuda et al2 examine the relationship between advanced life support (ALS) clinician type and outcomes following blunt traumatic cardiac arrest in Japan. This is an interesting study; however, there are limitations to consider.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
DiBrito S, Haut ER. In Blunt Traumatic Cardiac Arrest, Does It Really Matter Who Performs Prehospital Advanced Life Support? JAMA Surg. 2018;153(6):e180675. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0675
Monkeypox Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.