In this issue of JAMA Surgery, Jung and colleagues1 examine the safety and efficacy of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in Korean patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer. Their randomized clinical trial found decreased postoperative VTE with the use of low-molecular-weight heparin in addition to mechanical prophylaxis, compared with the use of mechanical prophylaxis alone. However, the authors claim that, because the VTE rate was low and the rate of bleeding was increased, VTE prophylaxis (low-molecular-weight heparin plus intermittent pneumatic compression) still may not be the right choice for all patients undergoing gastrectomy. Although we were pleased to see this focus on VTE, which until recently was understudied in Asian patients,2 we do have some questions about this trial and its conclusions.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Owodunni OP, Weiss MJ, Haut ER. Is Venous Thromboembolism in Asian Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy Different From Venous Thromboembolism in Their Western Counterparts?. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(10):946–947. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2082
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: