[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 508
Citations 0
Invited Commentary
October 2018

A Learning Health System Approach to the Opioid Crisis: Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste

Author Affiliations
  • 1Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
  • 2Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
  • 3Health, University of California, San Francisco
JAMA Surg. 2018;153(10):954. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2731

The opioid crisis is in the national headlines almost daily. Many US states have enacted prescribing restrictions and stipulations to begin addressing the problem. While it is unclear how much of the excess supply of opioids in circulation stems from perioperative prescribing, significant variation in prescribing practices is clear.1,2 We would argue that if practicing surgeons reflected on their own opioid prescribing practices, they would likely identify areas to improve. However, they would also realize the limited resources to appropriately set patient expectations for postprocedure pain and the paucity of evidence available to support approaches to calculating the dose and duration of opioids needed after common surgical procedures or the use of nonopioid analgesic regimens. In this issue of JAMA Surgery, Wetzel et al3 present a systematic review of interventions for postsurgical opioid prescribing, with a focus on system-level interventions, such as practice guidelines and electronic health record modifications. The authors conclude the same thing that many of us have come to realize in our daily practice: that there is evidence that these approaches are effective, but the literature in this area is very limited.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words