[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.173.57.84. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 2,529
Citations 0
Invited Commentary
January 2019

Is 30 Newtons of Prevention Worth a Pound of a Cure?—Cricoid Pressure

Author Affiliations
  • 1University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
JAMA Surg. 2019;154(1):18. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3590

Aspiration remains one of the most dreaded complications of endotracheal intubation. To mitigate the risk of aspiration in patients who are at high risk, rapid sequence induction (RSI) is used with an anesthetic and short-acting neuromuscular blocking agent. Cricoid pressure (the Sellick maneuver) has frequently been used for physically preventing aspiration.

Recognizing the lack of clinical trials that demonstrate clinically relevant beneficial outcomes, the use of cricoid pressure during RSI has been debated over the past decade.1-3 Regarding efficacy, although cricoid pressure is often not performed appropriately (ie, applying 30 newtons of pressure in the proper location), most studies demonstrate that cricoid pressure may prevent gastric insufflation by occluding the esophagus and postcricoid hypopharynx.4,5 However, other studies have suggested that cricoid pressure may displace the esophagus laterally or decrease lower esophageal sphincter pressure, thus increasing the risk of regurgitation.6 In addition, cricoid pressure may worsen the laryngoscopic view, further providing equipoise for studying its effectiveness.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×