The study in this issue of JAMA Surgery by Kummerow Broman et al1 is highly relevant to today’s surgeons. The stated aim is to conduct a “pragmatic” investigation into the use of photography in postoperative care, which is commendable, since such care is already widely conducted via smartphone. The most true-to-life scenario would be a surgeon evaluating his or her own patients’ wounds, as firsthand knowledge of the operation and the patient’s underlying risk factors for surgical site infection can be factored into decision making in a way that is lost in hypothetical scenarios (ie, pretest probability can be deployed to improve the positive or negative predictive value of the photographs). Nevertheless, health information technologies are popular with both patients and clinicians,2 and the surgical community needs richer data on both the effectiveness of such tools and their potential pitfalls.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Drake FT. Smartphone Photographs—Proceed, but With Caution. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(2):125. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3862
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: