[Skip to Navigation]
October 24, 2018

Translating Research Findings Into Practice—The Unfulfilled and Unclear Mission of Observational Data

Author Affiliations
  • 1Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas
  • 2Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • 3MD Anderson Cancer Center Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas, Houston
JAMA Surg. 2019;154(2):103-104. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3118

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are rightfully valued as the primary source of research data that drives changes in practice and directs evidence-based care. However, the time and associated costs of initiating a trial and completing patient accrual and follow-up are important limitations. Among 28 phase 3 studies funded by the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health, the total costs were more than $335 million, with a mean of approximately $12 million and a range from approximately $1 million to $64 million.1 By comparison, data from administrative claims, clinical registries, and electronic health records are readily available, cost-effective, and efficient for conducting observational research. These favorable features make observational data powerful tools that, when used properly, could potentially increase the rate at which scientific evidence is incorporated into contemporaneous clinical practice.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words