Bariatric surgery is the most effective option to treat obesity and associated health consequences.1 However, as obesity is a progressive condition and technical problems may happen after bariatric interventions, revisional surgery needs to be part of an escalation of therapy or correction after any postoperative technical issue, as already established after some other interventions, such as in oncology, arthroplasties, and heart surgery.2 Bariatric revisional surgery numbers are increasing. However, most of the published studies are small and cover less than 5 years of follow-up.3 Moreover, choosing the best primary procedure may determine the chances of long-term success and consequently affect the possibility of surgical revisions.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Cohen R. Revisional Bariatric Surgery and Choosing the First Procedure: Twenty-Six Years of Follow-up in the SOS Study. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(4):326–327. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5107
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: