[Skip to Navigation]
Views 221
Citations 0
Comment & Response
February 20, 2019

Debunking Myths About the Purpose and Intentions of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Testing

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • 2Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Southern Illinois University, Springfield
  • 3Department of Surgery, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
JAMA Surg. 2019;154(5):468. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5584

To the Editor The Research Letter by Dubina et al1 misses the mark with the stated conclusion. Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) testing has never claimed to decrease surgical complications; rather, FLS testing is a verification of the knowledge and skills required to perform basic laparoscopy. Practicing FLS skills to proficiency may help to accelerate learning and clinical transfer of skills, but there are no data about this in the current study.1 In addition, as noted in their communication citing the work of Schwaitzberg et al2 on 53 632 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, where FLS graduates performed statistically worse in terms of bile duct injury, some key points were missed. First, the FLS examination does not assess any knowledge or skills specific to cholecystectomy and thus is not expected to affect bile duct injury. The key finding of the study by Schwaitzberg et al2 was demonstration of an experience and perception gap between recent graduates and more experienced surgeons. Out of that work, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons Safe Cholecystectomy task force was created. Second, the analysis of complications specifically addressed in the FLS curriculum demonstrated a leveling-out of outcomes between junior and senior surgeons, suggesting it was possible to narrow the experience gap through education, training, and assessment. Finally, delineating the statistical effect on bile duct injury specifically (despite a 50% reduction in the FLS group) in a sample of only 3000 patients is potentially misleading when interpreting the results as having no difference.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words