To the Editor As in William Shakespeare’s iconic quote, “To be, or not to be,” controversies surrounding the use of cricoid pressure, most recently revisited by Birenbaum et al,1 do not seem to die down. I want to raise 2 points.
First, even though the study by Rice et al2 was referenced in their text, they continually indicated that cricoid pressure is presumed to work by occluding the esophagus. Even though Rice et al2 had radiologically quantified the anatomy of cricoid pressure by magnetic resonance imaging almost a decade ago and clearly documented the postcricoid hypopharynx—and not the esophagus—being occluded during cricoid pressure, Birenbaum et al1 continued to misinterpret the mobile esophagus as the reason for failure of cricoid pressure when the transfixed postcricoid hypopharynx had been shown to provide occlusive apposition, not only by the medially located bony surface of cervical vertebrae but also by the laterally located muscular surface of longus colli.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Gupta D. Utility of Cricoid Pressure. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(6):561–562. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5846
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: