[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 98
Citations 0
Comment & Response
February 27, 2019

Utility of Cricoid Pressure

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago
JAMA Surg. 2019;154(6):563. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5849

To the Editor Birenbaum et al1 compared the effectiveness of cricoid pressure (CP) with a sham procedure in the rapid sequence induction (RSI) of anesthesia. The authors reported that their study failed to demonstrate the noninferiority of the sham procedure in preventing pulmonary aspiration, implying no benefit of CP. However, the use of an inadequate number of patients (1717 per group) raises serious questions about the validity of this conclusion. The calculation of the group size by Birenbaum et al1 was based on the 2.8% incidence of aspiration reported by Martin et al.2 But the use of this value was inappropriate because that study was performed in relation to emergency intubations outside the operating room, where a higher aspiration rate would be expected. Assuming a more realistic incidence of aspiration in the operating room of 0.15%, a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of CP would require 2 groups of at least 25 000 patients each. Clearly, the study by Birenbaum et al1 was not sufficiently powered to detect a difference between the CP and sham groups and was vulnerable to a false-negative error.3

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words