In Reply We thank our colleagues for the opportunity to elaborate on our findings.1 One-handed cricoid pressure (CP) was applied in our trial. There is no evidence that bimanual pressure is better.2 Khorasani et al said that our study was not sufficiently powered, but this hypothesis was clearly discussed in the Discussion section.1 However, when looking at all end points, we also failed to observe any positive signals in favor of CP, making calculation of the number of patients needed for future trials difficult. To our knowledge, this is the largest clinical trial on CP, and we think that future recommendations should take it into account. If CP were to be invented today, a superiority trial would be required to adopt it. We have not demonstrated noninferiority but the previous literature has also failed to demonstrate a clear benefit of CP.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Birenbaum A, Hajage D, Riou B. Utility of Cricoid Pressure—Reply. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(6):564–565. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5851
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: