Advancements in combat casualty care have resulted in substantial improvements in civilian and military trauma care across the past decade. Within the theater of war, the Joint Trauma System has proven extraordinarily effective at continually implementing changes to improve both prehospital and in-hospital care for wounded warriors. An important challenge of continuous quality improvement is that it can be difficult to determine the effectiveness of individual interventions when additional system-level changes are occurring during the same period. In this issue of JAMA Surgery, Howard and colleagues1 have used data from several Department of Defense databases to tackle this challenge, and their work should be commended.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Gavitt B, Pritts TA. Hard-earned Lifesaving Lessons From the Combat Zone. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(7):609. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0152
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: