[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 532
Citations 0
Comment & Response
April 17, 2019

The Fragility Index—P Values Reimagined, Flaws and All

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
JAMA Surg. 2019;154(7):674. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0567

To the EditorP values are often misused and misinterpreted in the medical literature. Common mistakes include assuming P values measure the probability of a hypothesis being true (ie, indicate uncertainty) and quantify the strength of an observed effect (ie, conflating small P values with true effects).1 As a solution, Tignanelli et al2 strongly recommend the use of the Fragility Index (FI) and Fragility Quotient (FQ) in the reporting and appraisal of surgical randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words