New surgical procedures are continuously entering clinical practice. Evaluating these interventions to ensure their safe use is of the utmost importance. New procedures are distinctly different than other interventions (eg, pharmaceuticals).1,2 They are more complex, often require “tinkering” with techniques, and have learning curves with which to contend.2 Therefore, new surgical procedures proceed through a unique set of stages with their own evaluation end points.1
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Dimick JB, Sedrakyan A, McCulloch P. The IDEAL Framework for Evaluating Surgical Innovation: How It Can Be Used to Improve the Quality of Evidence. JAMA Surg. Published online June 05, 2019154(8):685–686. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0903
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: