Are objective measures of surgeon effort and surgical specialty associated with the assigned work relative value units of procedures?
In this cross-sectional study of 628 unique Current Procedural Terminology codes from 1 239 991 patient observations, 80% of the variations in assigned work relative value units were associated with procedures’ operative time, length of stay, and readmission and reoperation rates. Statistically significant differences remained, however, across surgical specialties despite controlling for these measures.
Incorporating objective data from a surgical registry may improve the relative value unit assignment and update processes, including reducing the differences across specialties.
The primary data sources used to generate and update work relative value units (RVUs) are surveys of small groups of specialists who are asked to estimate the time and intensity needed to perform surgical procedures. Because these surveys are conducted by specialty societies and rely on subjective data, these sources have been challenged as potentially biased.
To assess whether objective work measures are associated with a surgical procedure’s assigned work RVUs and whether differences exist by surgical specialty.
Design, Setting, and Participants
This cross-sectional study obtained data from the 2016 and 2017 participant use files of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The 2017 physician fee schedule of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services was a secondary data source. Procedures were included if they had at least 100 patient-level observations over the 2-year period. Data were analyzed from August 29, 2018, to April 2, 2019.
Main Outcomes and Measures
The dependent variable was a procedure’s assigned work RVU. Independent variables of work RVUs were 4 procedure-level work measures (median operative time, median postoperative length of stay, all-cause 30-day readmission rate, and all-cause 30-day reoperation rate) and surgeon specialty (10-level category using general surgery as the reference).
The data set included 628 unique Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and 726 CPT-specialty combinations from 1 239 991 patient observations. Statistically significant associations were found between each work measure and assigned work RVU, as follows: median operative time (R2 = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.71-0.78), postoperative length of stay (R2 = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.36-0.48), rate of readmission (R2 = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.13-0.23), and rate of reoperation (R2 = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.10-0.20). Including all 4 measures explained 80.2% (95% CI, 77.3%-83.1%) of the variation. Adding the surgical specialty improved the overall fit of the model (likelihood ratio test χ2 = 231.27; P < .001). Cardiac (7.78; 95% CI, 4.25-11.31; P < .001) and neurosurgery (2.46; 95% CI, 1.08-3.83; P < .001) had higher work RVUs compared with general surgery, whereas orthopedics (–1.53; 95% CI, –2.48 to –0.59; P = .002), urology (–1.58; 95% CI, –2.88 to –0.29; P = .02), plastics (–2.70; 95% CI, –4.39 to –1.01; P = .002), and otolaryngology (–3.05; 95% CI, –4.69 to –1.42; P < .001) had lower work RVUs compared with general surgery.
Conclusions and Relevance
Objective work measures appeared to be associated with assigned work RVUs, predominantly with operative time; registry data can be used to augment and inform the generation and updating processes of the work RVUs.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Childers CP, Dworsky JQ, Russell MM, Maggard-Gibbons M. Association of Work Measures and Specialty With Assigned Work Relative Value Units Among Surgeons. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(10):915–921. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2295
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: