Surgeons strive to improve patients’ lives by consistently delivering high-quality surgical care. This requires that surgeons continually synthesize research evidence and apply this to routine clinical care. Of course, consistent adherence to evidence-based medicine is challenging. The paradoxical dilemma between knowing and doing what is right is the foundation for implementation science, the study of strategies to promote uptake of effective interventions into routine practice with the aim of improving population health.1 Implementation science has great appeal through its relatability, adaptability, and far-reaching influence by translating what clinicians know into what they do.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Smith AB, Brooke BS. How Implementation Science in Surgery Is Done. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(10):891–892. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1515
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: